Magnets and internal defibs don't mix, it isn't new... doctors warn patients about this.
More newsworthy, is the likely situation that a person can accidently fall asleep with one his/her chest... leaving the person unprotected should an arrhythmia occur during their entire sleep.
I think the experiment would have been more scientifically interesting if the student compared it to other devices without built-in cover magnets... The apparatus may have been common devices, e.g. iPad, iPod, Asus tablet (no smart cover magnets), and Kindle.
If the results were say, something like, 30%, 0%,0%,0% respectively, then her results can likely be associated with the built in magnets.
Since it's not obvious the iPad has magnets (and a significant greater % of causing defib failure), doctors can then make note to remind patients of this specific higher probability and common situation (falling asleep with an iPad).
.
More newsworthy, is the likely situation that a person can accidently fall asleep with one his/her chest... leaving the person unprotected should an arrhythmia occur during their entire sleep.
I think the experiment would have been more scientifically interesting if the student compared it to other devices without built-in cover magnets... The apparatus may have been common devices, e.g. iPad, iPod, Asus tablet (no smart cover magnets), and Kindle.
If the results were say, something like, 30%, 0%,0%,0% respectively, then her results can likely be associated with the built in magnets.
Since it's not obvious the iPad has magnets (and a significant greater % of causing defib failure), doctors can then make note to remind patients of this specific higher probability and common situation (falling asleep with an iPad).
.
Last edited: