Sooo you use Windows now?I had a 14 inch pro but the weight and power was overkill for me so I sold it. I would buy one of these in a heartbeat if it had 120hz. I can’t go back to 60hz now.
At the current price of the base model, that would be a really good deal.I would rather see them up the base config from 8GB RAM/256GB SSD to 16/512 and that would increase demand more than a M3, mark my words.
Terrible take, that would make zero sense for consumers and manufacturers on not only laptops but literally everything else existence.Now if they sold both sizes for the same price it might be more comparable.
If all the M3 hype on a new smaller NM is true and we see 30ish percentage preformance boost and 30ish percentage less power then I would consider that a meaningful improvement.But they actually need to make a meaningful improvement over the M2. Remember how they’ve basically been using the same Apple Watch processor for years now but giving it new numbers to deceive consumers into thinking they’re upgrading.
Don’t be ridiculous. Any dell latitude at half the price can drive two external screens.If there is 1 feature that clearly qualifies as a pro option, it’s the ability to drive multiple screens at once.
I noticed that too late. Bought the M2 13” a couple of weeks ago to replace my 2014 MBP, only to notice that it cannot handle two external screens. baffles me. surely the computer would be able to handle it.Crazy expensive for what it is. Was going to replace my Mid 2015 15" MacBook Pro till I found out it can only handle 1 external display. 😂
Yup. Terrible to have one configurable model as opposed to 35 models.lol, terrible and cooky ideas like this is why most people aren’t fit to run a big company
yes, it's because it's all about YOUR needs. There are plenty of large screen options without the 15" MBA.A smaller MBA would sell worse than the 15" MBA.
The 11" MBA was removed from the Air line-up because it didn't sell as well. The 12" MacBook was discontinued because it didn't sell well either. Just like the iPhone mini.
I always felt a M1/M2 11"/12" MacBook would be way more capable then what was offered before in that laptop size category that is akin to a netbook. The intel CPU in those earlier small MacBook examples were pathetic in comparison to the larger intel based Mac Laptops which is why they disappeared. Todays AS chips you can truly make something revolutionary, even impact a lot of iPad sales. 🙂A smaller MBA would sell worse than the 15" MBA.
The 11" MBA was removed from the Air line-up because it didn't sell as well. The 12" MacBook was discontinued because it didn't sell well either. Just like the iPhone mini.
This right here. Just bumping it to 16G of RAM and a 512GB hard drive puts you at $300.00 less than a a base 14" MBP. For that small price bump you get a higher quality screen, 120HZ, higher memory bandwith, a better M2 chip, more ports and a larger power supply. Apple's ridiculous pricing for any kind of memory add-on is pure greed and the reason I don't have a 15" Air right now.It’s not about the M2 vs M3
It’s about the ridiculous upgrade pricing that takes a good starting price and quickly turns it into an overpriced machine.
I’m definitely buying one then.Give us that M3 chip and demand will go up.
You are assuming that most customers make the same power vs portability judgement as you. A lot of people don't need the power of a pro device but do need a larger screen. Many will only occasionally take their laptops out of the house. that is why 15" models are very popular in Windows laptops.