And slow 256GB SSD. Can't forget about the slow SSDStockpiling base models with the classic and inadequate 8 GB of RAM?
And slow 256GB SSD. Can't forget about the slow SSDStockpiling base models with the classic and inadequate 8 GB of RAM?
I think it will sell well. There's lots of people who just want a basic laptop with a large display, something that Apple hasn't had in their lineup in a very long time (if ever, really). These people don't want to drop MBP-level $2500+ for just a laptop with a big screen.I predict this will be a flop.
You may be right. My prediction is just based on seeing what Apple is doing across their lineup. They are providing tons of suboptimal choices and as a result people are moving away from the brand. It really is macOS/iOS/iPadOS only at this point, the hardware offerings are all poor. Those days of waiting in anticipation of a product release and running out and buying it with excitement are history.I think it will sell well. There's lots of people who just want a basic laptop with a large display, something that Apple hasn't had in their lineup in a very long time (if ever, really). These people don't want to drop MBP-level $2500+ for just a laptop with a big screen.
Me 100%Who's going to be placing an order for a 15" Macbook Air in Midnight with me?![]()
I mean I expect M chips in Macs to follow the use effect- perceive or real- of A chips in iDevices. A are "incredible", "I can't believe it", "more powerful than anything" at launch and then "getting long in tooth", "slowing down" within only a few years, partially in support of buying the new A-series device. I suspect(ed) M-series to get on that very same train (in spite of common, long-term expectations that Macs should outlast mobile iDevices).
How do we collectively feel about A-series iDevices sold at the same time as M1 Macs? I'm seeing plenty of "long in tooth", "slowing down" posts implying "upgrade time." Why? Because that A series is feeling like it is no longer working fast enough... a curious effect that seems to happen every other year or three.
Conceptually, M1 devices- of which I own one myself- could be getting there by this point too. Instead, M2 is mostly M1 with some refinements, so M1 people should generally feel their Macs are just about as fast as ever, etc. I'm not seeing much "long in tooth" etc about M1 Macs yet. But I fully expect it to arrive just like it does with A-series iDevices.
I suspect if we were on the originally-imagined pace such that M3 or perhaps even M4 was "latest & greatest" right now, M1 Macs would feel like A13/14 bionic is starting to be perceived now.
Instead, I'm happy my M1 still seems fresh & robust and- if M3 Macs are still upwards of 10 months out- it may have at least that long to continue to "feel" that way before the mysterious slow downs begin to show themselves.
Maybe it won't be like that with M-series? I only have A-series as a guide influencing my imagination.
Wish i had jumped on this in 2020. Instead, I made the bad decision to purchase in 2019. 13 inch mbp with touchbar and fans that sound like jet engines. Lousy battery life.Digitimes - they really have a great record with their predictions /s
I love my M1 MBA, best form factor ever, great performance, great battery life ...
lolIf it comes with 32gb RAM it's an instant buy for me.
LOLPlease default to more then 8/256
L O LI'm betting that the 13' M2 drops down $1,100, M1 MBA to $700, and M2 MBP to $1000, so that the new 15in can take the M2 13' in price spot to be a reasonable $1200.
Fair enough, but none of this is a good thing. Technology should keep moving forward, even if that means the average Joe doesn't have the latest and greatest anymore. The fact that Apple's going 3 years without a meaningful IPC upgrade is bad. It's reminiscent of 14nm++++ Intel. Not nearly as bad, of course, but the feeling's there.Those who jumped on the original M1s have had a remarkable run that looks like it still has some legs. Congratulations!
I recall one of the bigger arguments for Apple switching to Silicon was this idea that Apple would control the chip ugrade cycle and thus "we" would no longer have to wait for "only 'slow,' annual Intel chip upgrades." The gamble with those original M1s beyond only "1st generation anything" potentials was that spin actually proving out.
Instead, M1s have had and continue to have a solid run, much longer being THE chip than probably ANYONE assumed when they were buying one.
Per the original spin slung at each other, we should be well into at least M3 now and talking up the impending M4. If we really swallowed the spin, perhaps even M5 by now. Instead, rumors about M3 yields continue to imply that they might not arrive until NEXT year. If so, that's probably still 10+ months for M1 to continue to be "plenty" for most users. WOW!
It's not often you can buy anything Apple (computer) and stay pretty much fully up to date going into year 4. Early M1 buyers are benefiting from that anomaly... thanks to (a production side effect of) Covid or supply chain or inflation or whatever other reason we want to sling to each other.
$2,500+? What foolish person is paying full retail when they're always on sale?I think it will sell well. There's lots of people who just want a basic laptop with a large display, something that Apple hasn't had in their lineup in a very long time (if ever, really). These people don't want to drop MBP-level $2500+ for just a laptop with a big screen.
lol
LOL
L O L
Fair enough, but none of this is a good thing. Technology should keep moving forward, even if that means the average Joe doesn't have the latest and greatest anymore. The fact that Apple's going 3 years without a meaningful IPC upgrade is bad. It's reminiscent of 14nm++++ Intel. Not nearly as bad, of course, but the feeling's there.
Fair enough, but none of this is a good thing. Technology should keep moving forward, even if that means the average Joe doesn't have the latest and greatest anymore. The fact that Apple's going 3 years without a meaningful IPC upgrade is bad. It's reminiscent of 14nm++++ Intel. Not nearly as bad, of course, but the feeling's there.
Don’t worry, Amazon and BH Photo will discount the heck out of them. Apple still wins.If it is still with slow SSD, they will remain stock pilled in the warehouses.
I think it depends what you are doing. I'm an IT nerd and I have the 13" M2 air and the 16" M1 Pro max - the screen on the 13" seems great to me, just smaller. I do not miss anything except the larger size of the 16" so I'm hoping the 15" will be good enough when I'm on the go.I wonder if it makes sense to sell my 16 MBP M1 base config for the 15 Air?
I do nothing that requires more CPU than the base M2 chip.
I like the big screen, will I miss promotion?
I too am hopeful that a price drop of existing MacBooks accompanies this announcement!I'm betting that the 13' M2 drops down $1,100, M1 MBA to $700, and M2 MBP to $1000, so that the new 15in can take the M2 13' in price spot to be a reasonable $1200.
I'll belieive it when I see it only. This could be against something else like just updating both 13" models to current specs, particularly the 13" MBP with its 720P FaceTime camera, older non-spatial stereo speakers. The single SSD usage on the base models.Apple's supply chain has started stockpiling the rumored 15-inch MacBook Air, according to industry sources cited by DigiTimes. The report says the laptop is expected to be announced at Apple's annual developer conference WWDC, which begins June 5.
The base 14”Pro looks better and better as time goes on.13.6" M2 Macbook Air (16/512): $1699
14.2" M2 Macbook Pro (16/512): $1999
15" M2 Macbook Air (16/512): $1849 ???
why?I won't buy a Mac with a M2 processor.
People on this forum will never admit it because it's more fun to be mad at everything, but the Apple Silicon is actually one of precious few wins by Cook and co recently. I do a lot of GPU intensive tasks for work, and I'm blown away by the performance of the M1 Max. It's completely taken over my department, and the time savings on a lot of core tasks are simply incredible. That and AirPods are basically the only two recent products that have really taken hold in my world.Those who jumped on the original M1s have had a remarkable run that looks like it still has some legs. Congratulations!
I recall one of the bigger arguments for Apple switching to Silicon was this idea that Apple would control the chip ugrade cycle and thus "we" would no longer have to wait for "only 'slow,' annual Intel chip upgrades." The gamble with those original M1s beyond only "1st generation anything" potentials was that spin actually proving out.
Instead, M1s have had and continue to have a solid run, much longer being THE chip than probably ANYONE assumed when they were buying one.
Per the original spin slung at each other, we should be well into at least M3 now and talking up the impending M4. If we really swallowed the spin, perhaps even M5 by now. Instead, rumors about M3 yields continue to imply that they might not arrive until NEXT year. If so, that's probably still 10+ months for M1 to continue to be "plenty" for most users. WOW!
It's not often you can buy anything Apple (computer) and stay pretty much fully up to date going into year 4. Early M1 buyers are benefiting from that anomaly... thanks to (a production side effect of) Covid or supply chain or inflation or whatever other reason we want to sling to each other.
I'll take the other side of that bet. I bet Air 15" will be priced shockingly "makes no sense" high vs. MBpro pricing ("might as well just get a MBpro")... and then the illogic in those pricing conflicts will be resolved when the NEXT MBpros are rolled out also at jacked up prices to "fix" this problem.
Modern Apple is in "maximize profit per sale" more than ever before. They don't do that with the volume play of "lower our prices" (and yes, I did notice the new Mac Mini price cut vs. the prior offering).
We'll see... but note in seemingly 500 rumors about a 15" Air, NOT ONE has had ANY rumor about price. "We" seem to be the ones setting pricing expectations that Air should automatically be LESS THAN Pro because of history. What if THIS Air sets the new, higher price point for AIR... to be followed by the new higher price points for PRO? Past (pricing) performance does not necessarily reflect future pricing performance. Apple can do anything it wants.
Note the same kind of conflict between higher configs of Mac Mini vs. Mac Studio. There's many threads about those weird price conflicts too. How will that get resolved? Yes, Apple could decide to cut Mac Mini PRO pricing down to "fit" in well vs. existing Mac Studio pricing... OR the next Mac Studio could have jacked pricing to also "fix" this problem too. I expect that more than Mac Mini Pro price cuts to logically fit vs. Mac Studio.
I'll be quite happy to lose this bet, as I am interested in a new 15"+ laptop myself. But I'm simply assuming based on how I see Apple applying big innovations to squeeze every nickel out of every move. Cutting prices doesn't seem to support that observation. New higher pricing seems a popular card to play.