No M3, no buy
The M2 was such a minor improvement over M1. I'm not buying a 3 year old chip.
The M2 was such a minor improvement over M1. I'm not buying a 3 year old chip.
There's some real fortune-telling right there. Are we supposed to believe they are working on an M3 13" MBA alongside an M2 15" MBA??? What other way would they update the 13"?Apple is also working on an updated 13-inch MacBook Air, according to Gurman.
I wouldn’t underestimate how much thinness and a little wider body will make it feel lighter though. Just like how two individuals who are the same weight will look much different depending on their height.A 15" MBA isn't going to be any lighter than a 14" MBP though
13" MBA is 2.7 pounds (1.24 kg)
14" MBP (M2 Pro) is 3.5 pounds (1.60 kg)
16" MBP (M2 Pro) is 4.7 pounds 2.15 kg)
15" MBA = 3.6 to 3.9 pounds???
The older 2021 16" MBP with 16GB Ram/512GB storage is selling at BB for $1999 USD. The same in 14" is $1599 USD. Both use mini-LED displays, 6 speaker audio.If I want a 15 inch MBA with 16 GB of RAM and 512 GB storage, that’ll easily push it over $2,000 right?
At that point I don’t think it’s worth it. Sorry. Too expensive for me.
Those are much better values, in my opinion.The older 2021 16" MBP with 16GB Ram/512GB storage is selling at BB for $1999 USD. The same in 14" is $1599 USD. Both use mini-LED displays, 6 speaker audio.
There's some real fortune-telling right there. Are we supposed to believe they are working on an M3 13" MBA alongside an M2 15" MBA??? What other way would they update the 13"?
This is all random wide-net Gurman nonsense as usual. If they are making both a 15" MBA and a new 13" MBA, they are probably both M3. If it's only a 15", then it might just be M2.
Absolutely not. Jony Ive was a minimalism disaster.Apple's lost the design touch. They need Jony Ive back.
because back then Apple wasnt samsung to have every single dimensionIt always baffled me why there wasn't a 15" MacBook Air released 12 years ago. Why the need to force people (perhaps even the majority) to buy smaller screens than they'd like to have? Because Apple think they knew better or because it drove some extra traffic towards the top end MacBook Pros?
Either way, better late than never, I guess. Perhaps the longest overdue upgrade in computing history.
Edit: Of course it's doomed to have the ugly boxy look of the M2 Air rather than the classic good looking tapered design, and it'll probably cost as much as a 15" Pro did a couple of years back.![]()
8GB base memory still? That means $200 to upgrade to 16GB.
And the base model will have the slow 256GB SSD too.
Oh, Apple....![]()
They offered 3 screen sizes, and they reserved the largest for the MacBook Pro. They hardly avoided offering the MacBook Air in a larger size to avoid offering "every single dimension".because back then Apple wasnt samsung to have every single dimension
But its good when you have choices i guess
The 256GB SSD is even more embarrassing than the 8GB RAM, for a product that's likely to cost £1,600...🤦♂️
The M2 is seen by some as a stop gap chip, and just a mild improvement on the M1. Hopefully it's not too long before the M3 and a more meaningful bit of progressThere was a 20 month gap between M1 and M2. We are 9 months into the M2 generation now, and Apple has yet to update 1/3 of the Mac lineup. So absent any evidence that Apple is increasing their release cadence, I would expect M3 to come out in early 2024. The rest of 2023 will be spent with M2 versions of iMac, Mac Studio, Mac Pro, and the new MacBook Air 15" — which I’ll buy day one, even with the “old” chip.