Yawn. You make no sense. Why are you even arguing with me?When did I say NVIDIA forces developers to push their GPUs? It is the same as Windows.
Some developers use NVIDIA proprietary tools because it means less work or they are sponsored.
Yawn. You make no sense. Why are you even arguing with me?When did I say NVIDIA forces developers to push their GPUs? It is the same as Windows.
Some developers use NVIDIA proprietary tools because it means less work or they are sponsored.
You should switch to Linux + NVIDIA.Swap the name Nvidia with Apple and replace the word GPU with API and the same criticism applies to Apple and their depreciation of OpenCL and OpenGL
Yeah very funny, see here:Amazingly, I just went to price out a machine and noticed that Apple lowered the prices on all the upgrades like cpu and ram amount for this laptop. Interesting..
Drop the AMD vs Nvidia chat, FFS. That discussion's been had countless times, and no one wins from repeating it all over again.
I'm using a pretty powerful PC with 3 Nvidia cards. I prefer macOS but Apple isn't interested in supporting the industry I work in.You should switch to Linux + NVIDIA.
Cheapest configuration with Vega 16 is $3.049-
Another Tim Cook screw job.
There is nowhere to put it in the current 13" MacBook Pro chassis, much less dissipate the heat it generates.It's a shame they don't offer these graphics card choices for the MacBook Pro 13.
Why should it be?
You payed and bought for the product at that time for the current price at that time. It is with everything like that. At one point you decide to buy or to wait. If you have to wait until the next revision or model you never have to buy anything
I also don’t understand why some Apple consumers say a 2600 dollar product is deprecated or obsolete when the next one comes out with only a few minor changes. It is not like the iPhoneX is total crap and stops working now the the XS is out...
so if the iPhone 11 came out next year and Apple decided to break the cycle and an iPhone 11S gets released a couple of months later, you’re saying that no one should be pissed? you’re telling me that you wouldn’t be pissed if you bought the iPhone 11?
Interesting how Apple is charging for any technical improvement. Remember the days when computers got faster at the same price point?
Why not...runnnig a 2017 MacBook Pro 15" with Mojave and an external GPU perfectly fine in both bootcamp and Mojave. Using Sonnet Breakaway box with RX 480Uuuh in Mojave? I don't think so.
I
The Vega 20 is then... a standalone Vega M GL?
Well, considering the best eGPU for the mini right now is a Vega 56, I'd say it would be significantly faster.Any comparisons between:
a) Mac Mini with the best external GPU.
vs.
b) MBP with Vega 20 GPU.
Anyone knowledgeable on this...?
All they need to do is support it. Why are you arguing with me? Apple are far worse than Nvidia in terms of being a monopoly and it's incredibly dumb to accuse Nvidia of being the juggernaut.
You’re not recalling the pricing correctly. It is exactly the same as last year for the low/mid/high end models at $2,399/2,799/3,099. Pricing for RAM/SSD also did not change, though as in the case of the graphics options, there are now higher cost (higher-end) configurations available, i.e. 32GB/4TB/Vega.Having paid £2,100 for my 15" last year with discount, the new borderline £3k price for the new higher end model and upgraded graphics costing £800 more for the same spec (RAM, SSD etc.) - yeah the CPU is more powerful now but...I am struggling with the price hike here. The MBP seems to have experienced a far more egregious hike than other models on the line. Might just be me, and as always to each their own...
The GPU wasn't available until a few weeks ago, and we don't know how soon AMD could actually ship it in volume. The implication that Apple somehow intentionally deceived customers by withholding a product doesn't apply.
Well, considering the best eGPU for the mini right now is a Vega 56, I'd say it would be significantly faster.
Swap the name Nvidia with Apple and replace the word GPU with API and the same criticism applies to Apple and their depreciation of OpenCL and OpenGL
I'm not talking about market share, I'm talking about their terribly aggressive approach to their products ie the third party repair market and the App store.Well Apple with a mere 7% pc market and 9% of smartphones is not a monopoly at all, choose another word.
First off, yes, I think it's unreasonable to complain about a short update cycle. You're still getting precisely what you paid for.
Second, this isn't quite the same. The GPU wasn't available until a few weeks ago, and we don't know how soon AMD could actually ship it in volume. The implication that Apple somehow intentionally deceived customers by withholding a product doesn't apply.
But there were no vega mobile back then, so choose, you want frequent updates or one every few years? There is no way around, it's funny tho, you can't make everyone happy but you can make everyone sad.
It is clear that if people do not bother with OpenCL, they will bother even less with Apple's proprietary stuff.Apple has created OpenCL. Yes, they were also fairly quick to abandon it once it was clear that OpenCL's adoption in the industry is lacklustre. And since Vulcan went a very different direction than what Apple hoped for, they have rolled their own API, and a better one than anything else currently on the market. As to their depreciation of OpenGL — about time! OpenGL was my entry in 3d APIs and I spend a lot of fun time with it, but it has been effectively dead since Long Peaks initiative has been killed off.
Uuuh in Mojave? I don't think so.