They just screwed thousands of users by removing the standalone feature in version 7.8 without warning. Glad I didn't hit the update button.
I did hit that update button.. my saving grace is that because my kids are still using the 6s, I'm using iTunes 12.6.5.3 (the last version with the App Store), so I was able to pull the old version out of the trash and restore it.
Can't do it. I'm happy to support them by buying a release every couple of years. But I rarely do subscriptions. I'm still on version 6 and it does all I need. Soon, iOS will natively do all I need. They could have gotten a good deal of $$ out of me if they had stayed away from subscriptions. That being said, I'm sure they have made plenty
I'm still on 6 as well.. my problem is that I'm on a 10 year old Mac, and while it's still solid (hasn't had a single bit of repair/service), I can't go any further on MacOS than Sierra (High Sierra crashes horribly on it), and since this year is the last year of Intel CPUs, I'll be going Silicon. Normally that wouldn't be a problem, but since 1Password 7 is available, but the ability to purchase standalone licenses is NOT available, I'm stuck for as long as Rosetta works when I get a new Mac.
Absolutely, I was commenting on people using 1P7 local vaults versus concerns about 1P cloud vaults.
If you do things like Yubikey, which 99% of people will not, then the other risks I raised around local storage on a general computing device become less of an issue too.
The one thing that people seem to forget about cloud vaults or having a 3rd party manage your vault is the legal liability aspect of it. People don't tend to realize that while they are given the feature of convenience by having your data available everywhere because of the cloud, the takeaway from that is that for the data you have in the cloud, you may not legally own it.
Now, speaking for the US here: if the authorities were hypothetically investigating you (generic) for any reason, if they needed something from you that is in your possession, they would require a warrant for them to obtain that information from you,
n'est-ce pas?
Well, not so if that data belonging to you is in the hands of a 3rd party. Since they aren't directly involved with that investigation, a simple subpoena could be used to have that 3rd party hand over your data.
That's a problem. And yes, while everyone can say "well, they don't have a way to get into my vault because they'd need my password!", the problem is that they have physical access to your vault: as in,
they have their physical hands on it. It would be in their possession. All of this was brought to light by an investigation NPR did regarding a person's data, their digital trail, and their 4th Amendment Constitutional right:
Could government agents really get access to all your private data in less than a minute? Experts say no but warn we are moving in that direction.
www.npr.org
If people are okay wth the potential of that happening, and not being secure in having their own data - and passwords to your sensitive data at that - then more power to them. However, when it comes to sensitive information like this, let alone any other sensitive info one may store in 1Password (I store my family's Social Security Numbers, Passports, Birth Certificates, etc.), I would not want to give up the security and being secure in that data (meaning, only I have physical possession of that data) for the sake of convenience.
BL.