Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'd personally rather see an Apple branded sort of Tablet (not computer, but like a WACOM tablet).

Granted, WACOM makes very nice products from my experience, but an Apple version would be nice.

Mice are painful regardless of the number of buttons.
 
"I just want to go to third-world countries and bathe their children. I'm just a mercenary."


LMAO .... precious
 
Originally posted by weev
Am I missing something here.

You can buy 2-button mice for macs. Is that right?

Remember: Apple don't want to forget what Apple is. They have always lost it when they imitate PC's.

Viva le diff, pls go buy a Kensington or whatever if you want wheels and buttons.

Go one button mouse, look, have drunk wine, I love you mouse, don't go changin'. Just promise you'll respect me in the morning.

Besides, how difficult is it to hold down the control key? It's the same thing? No?
 
Two button mice are for stupid beginners. I want three button mice so I can copy and paste with one hand. :)
 
Re: Re: Nice 'tude

Originally posted by cosmicsoftceo
My dad still doesn't understand what the right mouse button *or* scroll wheel does, and he's been using Windows since version 3.1 at his company.

Then your dad's not to quick upstairs. If he ever pressed the right mouse button he would see what it does, and the scroll wheel.....c'mon.
 
Originally posted by fred
Let me understand your logic....Apple should cater to the lowest common denominator (beginners) and force people to pay for one button mice on even pro systems ? Brilliant

Yes, because the professional or even the avid user is going to have their own concept of what they need in a mouse or an input device. Not one mouse can satisfy all these people so it's better that Apple supply the simplest form and allow the other people choose what they want from the vast selection of 3rd party mice and input devices.
 
Originally posted by Physiognome
Two button mice are for stupid beginners. I want three button mice so I can copy and paste with one hand. :)

I have the Kensington StudioPro. It has 3 buttons and a scroll pad. The two outside buttons can be programmed to function as a 4th button if pressed simultaneously and the scroll pad can be configured so a tap at the top would be a 5th button and a tap at the bottom a 6th button and still retain the scrolling function.

I rarely use more then the two buttons and the scroll pad except when playing a game.
 
Well right now I would love to have a one button Apple mouse instead of a Kensington mouse where one of the buttons doesn't work and I have to wait at least 7 days before Kensington gets me a replacement mouse......I don't know about you.....but I would love to have that one button Apple mouse....too bad my old one button Apple mouse got destroyed by my wife....was my fiancee' at the time....LOL

Beyond that....I don't care if its one button or more buttons. I just use the mouse.....it is like people who complain about track pads.....i happen to like track pads.
 
Re: 2 button mice are NOT confusing

Originally posted by SpamJunkie
So the real question isn't, "why isn't Apple using two button mice?," it's, "why isn't Apple making two button mice usable?"
Ooh, now there's a good comment.

If you ask me, though, I don't think it's that big of an issue. I personally don't have a problem with a one-button mouse, but I like multi-button mice and have an 8-button scrollwheel mouse at home. On the other hand, I know plenty of users who don't want a 2 button mouse; my wife prefers the single button Apple mouse. And, I've seen begining users baffled by more than one button. I fully support Apple's of a one-button mouse around for those folks, and I hope they never change that--it's a real point of differentiation (though a one-button scroll wheel might be cool).

On the other hand, I don't think it'd kill Apple to make an optional multi-button mouse available as an option for pro users; just like they now make a wired and wireless keyboard and mouse, but you get the choice depending on which you prefer (and if you're willing to pay the extra money for a wireless one).

Then again, you can get a decent 2-button mouse for $15 and a really nice one for $50, so I just don't see the big issue. Sell the pill one if you hate it that much--you can get at least $20 for the thing on eBay.
 
Originally posted by MacBandit
If you hate it that much go use a PC. It's not at big deal. Also for under $20 you can get a mouse that matches the Mac. Maybe not at your local PC Mart where you probably shop but you can online.

amen, bro
 
My problem with the 1 button bluetooth mouse:

If I want a two button + scrollwheel bluetooth mouse for my 17" AlBook, guess who I have to buy it from?
 
Re: Re: Re: Nice 'tude

Originally posted by MUrhino
Then your dad's not to quick upstairs. If he ever pressed the right mouse button he would see what it does, and the scroll wheel.....c'mon.

Look, as hard as it is to comprehend... this is how it is...

Most people don't know how these thing work. If you've ever seen anyone who doesn't know how to use a computer... it's frustratingly painful to watch. You can insult them, but it doesn't make them disappear.

arn
 
Originally posted by Doctor Q
Which is why it is odd that computer ads, including Apple's print-magazine ads, are full of buzzwords that make sense to techies but not to most people reading the ads. We are worrying about 801.11g vs. 801.11b and how important Level 3 cache is, while people are buying computers because they like the color of the case or because they like the sound of the words "Airport Extreme".

Two questions on the mouse issue:

(1) When Steve says "over my dead body", is it based on gut instinct as it sounds or has there been any real market research by Apple or anyone else?

(2) Wouldn't everyone be happy if Apple let you delete the mouse from a custom order and order a third-party mouse instead? Novices would take the default and prosumers and anyone else who wanted a two-button/scrollwheel mouse could have it instead, without paying for the Apple mouse. Apple could still claim "simplicity" and everyone would have the mouse features they wanted. It sounds so simple, but they aren't doing it. What am I missing?

There was a time when Macs didn't come with a keyboard or mice. You should have heard the screaming then. Be glad they ship a keyboard or mouse at all and go buy what you want.

Personally I use a USB mouse and keyboard that came with the Linux kit for my PS2. The mouse is 2 button with a scroll wheel which is a joy to use. However, I believe Apple probably has a good reason to stay with the one button mouse. For one thing, it makes the 3rd party software developers keep the interface simple since everyone won't have 2 buttons on their mouse.
 
Right now i have a 5 button mouse (microsoft intellimouse explorer) but i'd rather have that 7 button mouse that came out a little while ago....

Apple, give me a 7 button mouse! THEN you wont be immitating PC's!!!!!
 
Re: Re: such a non-issue

Originally posted by fred
I hate posts that somehow insinuate that we the paying customers are at fault or too finicky.....repeat after me: THE CUSTOMER IS ALWAYS RIGHT !!!

You, sir, are to be applauded.

That's what this is all about.

When Apple puts only one-button mice on display next to their computers, when that is all they offer when you buy, it sends a message that they will decide what's best for you.

When it's already scary for a lot of people to switch to a new platform, do you think it's a good idea to make them feel even less in control? One-button mice are always one of the first complaints I hear from Windows users. I don't have the time or the means to tell all of them they can buy their own multi-button mice, and besides, why should anyone have to when they are already buying a computer that costs two to three times what a comparable Wintel offers?
 
Re: Moron!

Originally posted by Frobozz
Jobs has made the cardinal mistake of insisting something stay the same against all public opinion. I can't think of a single person that thinks control-clicking something is more intuitive than clicking a right mouse button.

Right, and Command-clicking a link obviously opens a new tab/window in browsers, Option-dragging obviously copies a file in the Finder, while Command-dragging will move a file across hard drives (not copying), and Command-Option-dragging makes an alias.
I still don't understand why this is an issue. All it does is cut down mousing mistakes. Plus, how can you have a two-buttoned mouse when the whole mouse acts as a single button? Not that they couldn't redesign it, but there is a reason why PC mice are fugly. Alternatively, Apple could design the mouse and farm out production, like its deal w/Harmon Karndon (sp?). But, anyway, would you split the Return key for the differing UNIX and MacOS functions? And a third to emulate Option-L to continue an AppleScript line? And the Space Bar-- which is a perfect analogy, because since you hit it so often, they make it big.

And, for those who've been complaining that the "customer is always right," that's very untrue: in 1980 most customers wouldn't think that a GUI would be a good thing, and in 1972, most people saw computers as things only university profs and students could use/know how to use/have a use for a computer. And why would customers want non-beige PCs?

tom
 
Just make it an option

Well, ideally, Apple would just make a Two Button/Scroll wheel "pro" mouse an optional alternative extra, so that we could

(a) Buy only the mouse we want.

(b) Buy a mouse that matches our beautiful computer.

(c) Not confuse new users unnecessarily with multiple buttons.

(d) Placate switching windows users more easily.

(e) Give ALL our money to Apple instead of companies like Logitech or <shudder> Microsoft </shudder>
 
For all the ranting and raving going on, at the end of the day I just feel sorry for apple.

They had such an opportunity to make a product that a lot of people would actually want to buy.

How many people will honestly be willing to stump up $70 solely for the premium of not having a wire to worry about? It strikes me as insanity...

I realise this is a generalisation, but who tends to buy new mice... techy people who want more functionality. It's not like mice break down that often and there's a pent up demand for one button replacements.

This isn't a rant at anyone here at all, I'm just p*ssed off I can't have a nice apple mouse that matches my system
;)
 
Re: Just make it an option

Originally posted by mvc
Buy only the mouse we want.

Go buy a new Mac, non-laptop variety. Notice that the mouse is bundled inside the computer box, right by the keyboard.

If Apple wanted to offer two separate mouse options, they'd have to either (1) continue bundling the standard mouse with the computer and replace it with the "pro" mouse as part of a build-to-order configuration, or (2) package both the standard and "pro" mice separately. Both of these would introduce significant logistics problems for Apple. Not insurmountable problems, of course, but they'd have to be solved, and solving them wouldn't be free.

The third option is the one you specifically don't want to hear about: continue to bundle the standard mouse, but offer an Apple-branded "pro" mouse as a peripheral. Not a cheap peripheral, either; I'd estimate that Apple would have to sell it for at least $79 to keep it from being a money-loser for them, and $99 wouldn't be out of the question. They just wouldn't be doing the kind of volume business to justify selling a mouse for $19.99.

Still excited about the idea of an Apple mouse?

(Incidentally, I can't remember the last time such an incredibly stupid issue captured so much attention. Use the bloody Apple mouse. Panther has effectively deprecated the contextual menu, anyway. If you're using a piece of software like Maya that requires a special mouse, go buy it and quit complaining.)
 
ARN!!

What about the Apple Patent for a new mouse that can scroll horizontally and vertically without a traditional scroll wheel, doesnt that sound and awfully lot like the new Microsoft mouse coming out? any comments on this please??!!
 
Re: So much anger!

Originally posted by reedm007
2 BUTTON MICE LEAD TO BAD UI DESIGN:
This is inherent in windows software design. They assume all users will have 2 button mice, so you often have commands in contextual menus that don't exist elsewhere.

This is only correct to an extent.

1) This is not true of all applications. Not offering a feature on a computer because it could be used for bad UI design would remove a lot of features from a computer.

2) Some menu options exist necessarily in the contextual menus. Show me where in Safari is a "download link to disk" or "open link in new tab" menu outside of the ctrl+click menu. Then, assume one exists in the main program menus, and show me how you would point at the link AND navigate the application menus at the same time.

Yes, we can Option+click to perform the "open link in new tab" function. That's even worse. There's NO visual input to guide you to the function - only a memorized mouse/keyboard combination.

1. Give you a 1-button mouse with the computer, but offer a 2-button for sale seperately.

Problem with option 1: People will be pissed that they have to fork over extra money to Apple for a second mouse, and this offers few advantages to APple over allowing you to choose a 3rd party mouse.

This is pretty weak. The OPTION to buy the 2nd mouse would "piss" these users off less than not having the option at all. Just because a scenario is perfect does not mean that it is not better than the current one.

2. Let you choose online in BTO configurations.

Problem with option 2: Inventory. It would be virtually impossible for retail stores (including Apple authorized resllers AND Apple Stores) to know what percentage of users will buy each.

........ what??

By your logic, Apple should never release new products, ever. It's not always easy to gauge what demand for a new product will be. That's still no argument against releasing it and finding out.

3. Allow you to "delete" the mouse from your order.

Problem with option 3: Much like the BTO issue of problem 2, since the mouse is shipped *with* the computer, you still suffer from reseller issues as well as added cost for Apple to *remove* the mouse from your custom order.

They seem to manage fine doing every other BTO option. This never seemed to stop them from offering new BTO options either. Should Apple have not added Airport/Extreme to the BTO options for the same reason? Is it somehow more expensive to REMOVE something from the computer box than it is to ADD an item to the system itself?

Apple could just start shipping all units without mice and require and extra purchase, but you KNOW people would complain about how Macs don't even ship with mice.

Well this is true. Shipping a computer without a component needed for its operation (exception: displays) is a bad idea.

Basically, my point is, I don't see a good solution here.

None of your options had any sort of deal-breaking failure. How do these guys handle the "inventory nightmare" of multiple entries in the iBook and PowerBook line? What about different iPods?

Obvious answer: make replacing the mouse a BTO option. If you can add rather inexpensive things like a Bluetooth module to the physical device itself, you can certainly take a damn 1-button mouse out of a box and throw a 2-button one in.

Also, make a conservative number of 2-button mice available to retailers. Gauge it like you would any other product that people may or may not run out and buy (iSight, etc). Just like ANY OTHER PRODUCT, you make the initial release in fairly low numbers, gauge the demand, and make each next shipment accordingly.

Gawd, if companies were as pathetically helpless as you make Apple out to be, industry would grind to a halt.

Yet ironically enough, I don't think this is even an issue for desktop machines. It's not that freakin' hard to go buy a USB mouse with as many buttons as you'd like, and plug it into the machine. I don't own a desktop Mac yet, but when I do, I'll be plugging a USB optical IntelliMouse into it. Problem freaking solved. If you have to have one that "looks" like the computer, there are some out there as well. If your biggest computer problem is that your mouse doesn't have an Apple logo on it, well......

Where I find the 2-button argument to matter is laptop touchpads. There, you don't have the choice, and yet, there also, your arguments would actually hold water (inventory of 1-button vs. 2-button LAPTOPS would not be fun for anyone, and some sort of BTO option would be pricey).
 
Re: ARN!!

Originally posted by davidc2182
What about the Apple Patent for a new mouse that can scroll horizontally and vertically without a traditional scroll wheel, doesnt that sound and awfully lot like the new Microsoft mouse coming out? any comments on this please??!!

There are other mice on the market that do this. I've seen several with tiny track ball where the scroll wheel would be. Allowing page movement in any direction.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.