Do tell more about the client-side content spying?I am slowly weaning off Apple in response to the Apple bluetooth mesh spy network and client-side file content spying. I did enjoy my 20 years with Apple products though.
Do tell more about the client-side content spying?I am slowly weaning off Apple in response to the Apple bluetooth mesh spy network and client-side file content spying. I did enjoy my 20 years with Apple products though.
…..As does everyone else.I'm old school but I bought my watch for its functionality.
Allow full and unrestricted automation similar to tasker and macrodroid. For god sakes, I can’t even automate when and how my vpn is activated in Shortcuts. And that’s just one example. It’s useless.
Also, notifications are such an unusable mess compared with android 12.
Imho it's inconsistent - e.g. some apps allow for views that others don't. And it's unintuitive to use (e.g. the touch targets for moving or changing "windows" in slide-over view are neither self explanatory nor easy to hit). Changing the active window can be mystery - e.g. it's possible to move a text window in one pages-window and still have the other staying the active window - and this is only indicated by the background of the three dots. I can't recount how iften I've typed something only to realize that it's in the wrong window.In what way? It was greatly improved last year buy adding the control icons instead of depending on just gestures. What else is wrong or missing that justifies you calling it a hot mess?
I agree. iOS seems to be the Corolla here (with a 911 price). I’ve had this Corolla for 10 years. I’m ready for something worthy of Porsche money.I suspect the issues you raise in your first paragraph are security features, not a bug. You are in the wrong house if you want this level of core access. Apple is never going to deliver that. Doesn’t make it useless. You just need to go find a tool that does what you want it to do.
A Toyota Corolla can’t match a Porsche 911. That doesn’t make it useless however.
I’m glad you get it. I’m not sure why no many others are so resistant to change.Imho it's inconsistent - e.g. some apps allow for views that others don't. And it's unintuitive to use (e.g. the touch targets for moving or changing "windows" in slide-over view are neither self explanatory nor easy to hit). Changing the active window can be mystery - e.g. it's possible to move a text window in one pages-window and still have the other staying the active window - and this is only indicated by the background of the three dots. I can't recount how iften I've typed something only to realize that it's in the wrong window.
Last years improvements were welcome, but it's still half-baked. And I guess that's why apple is still working on it.
I'm always trying to do some light work like writing on the ipad, as I like the form-factor, but in most cases it's things like multitasking that make it way slower than working on a laptop - and thus not really viable from a business point of view.
It's a great machine for e-mail, media consumption, drawing and editing photos with the apple pencil - but apart from the pencil, not a lot has changed over the last 12 years, when it comes to use cases - the hardware has gotten really great but it's still hampered by the "scaled up ios"-approach.
I'd welcome the option to switch between iPadOS abd OSX on an M1 ipad, although we all know that this is never going to happen (at least officially). It'd be far from ideal (although it worked fine on an 11" MBA with far less screen resolution), but still better than iPadOS today. Just compare the endlessly nested and complicated settings app vs. system preferences on OSX. This is not going to be solved by forever adding new functions to an OS that was first developed for a 480x320 3,5" display.
Or call it ios 20. Doesn’t matter. In 5 years ios will look exactly the same as today and apple will be working on making slight improvements to the camera.Yawn. Should call it IOS 15.6
Mute for 5 minutes isn’t very smart. Just mute the redundant notifications if you haven’t acknowledged the notification yet (e.g. Same sender to same group). And stop announcing a notification if you’ve activated the Watch’s face or unlocked the iPhone screen.Notification request - When I receive a message from someone, and then another message, and another and another… just send me a notification for the first message and then mute for the next 5 min. I don’t need 8 notifications in a row, back to back, for a single text thread.
Yes because you use a third partyI do sleep tracking every night with my Apple Watch. I’m currently using Autosleep to display the stats because I like their graphs better. I don’t have to tell it when I’m going to sleep. AFAIK it uses the same tracking data as collected by the built in sleep tracking.
You don’t get the point. There’s noooo sleep tracking on the watch. You have to tell the watch when you’re going to sleep! Otherwise it doesn’t work.Fitbit was a piece of garbage five years ago:
- two replacements of a Fitbit Charge before its warranty expired
- no notifications
- can't be used for payments
That was five years ago, so I'm calling BS on your statement.
Could sleep tracking on the Apple Watch be better? Definitely.
You don’t get it. It doesn’t do a good job, you could hardly tell if it does any job at all. It’s obvious you haven’t use any product other than the Apple Watch. This thing doesn’t have basic functionality from 3 to 5 years ago, what part don’t you get that doesn’t even track your sleep without you setting it up manually? It’s a joke of a product, seriously. I’m back to using my Fitbit that lasts I don’t know how many days with a charge, can monitor heart rate, can detect when I’m going to sleep and has text notifications.There are a lot of people out there that would disagree with you, including me.
Is it perfect? Of course not.
Does it do a good job in its core competencies (health tracking, short interactions and notifications)? You bet.
I'm curious. What do you mean by "improvements for jazz"? I also don't quite understand what would be different in a "Music app for classical music"?> Optional Apple Music app for classical music
Interesting. I wonder if any improvements for jazz will ever appear. Being able to categorise albums by who's playing which instrument (and making this searchable) would be very useful indeed.
Oh hell to the no. Sorry, but no. Having separate ringer and media volume levels is already confusing enough for many people (and becomes second nature once/if learned). Your phone/iPad has volume buttons and plenty of interface volume controls—use them as needed.For iOS 15 I think one of the biggest complaints I hear about regularly is how volume control is handled.
The easiest fix in iOS 16 would be when you 3D press (or whatever we call it with our long press now) on the volume control in control center, to have it open up distinct controls for different things for example, something like: Ringer volume, system sounds volume, Alarm volume, applications volume.
Like someone else asked, would you please divulge any info/elaborate on those two issues? Don’t worry, I’m not a complete fanboy and I’m not going to bite your head off. Just intrigued/concerned/out of the loop.I am slowly weaning off Apple in response to the Apple bluetooth mesh spy network and client-side file content spying. I did enjoy my 20 years with Apple products though.
When I bought the app, Apple didn't do sleep tracking but they have since added it. You have to go into the Health app to see the result. I just prefer the level of detail from Autosleep ro Sleep++. I believe for all of them you set a window during which you expect to sleep and the watch and apps focus on that time for tracking, but if you go to sleep earlier or later they still pick that up. Not sure if they would pickup a nap in the afternoon but I can never ever sleep at random like that.Yes because you use a third party
App. The Apple Watch by itself can’t do
It. That’s why you had to buy that app by the way.
This conversation would be more beneficial if you would actually state what you want to change, otherwise just you calling out words like "joke" and "mess" doesn't add anything of value.This is a joke, right? Have you tried 12L? That’s how multitasking should operate.
what is MTP and what value does it bring to the Finder?Hope they finally add MTP support to macOS' Finder.
thank you for detailing your reasons like that.Imho it's inconsistent - e.g. some apps allow for views that others don't. And it's unintuitive to use (e.g. the touch targets for moving or changing "windows" in slide-over view are neither self explanatory nor easy to hit). Changing the active window can be mystery - e.g. it's possible to move a text window in one pages-window and still have the other staying the active window - and this is only indicated by the background of the three dots. I can't recount how iften I've typed something only to realize that it's in the wrong window.
Last years improvements were welcome, but it's still half-baked. And I guess that's why apple is still working on it.
I'm always trying to do some light work like writing on the ipad, as I like the form-factor, but in most cases it's things like multitasking that make it way slower than working on a laptop - and thus not really viable from a business point of view.
It's a great machine for e-mail, media consumption, drawing and editing photos with the apple pencil - but apart from the pencil, not a lot has changed over the last 12 years, when it comes to use cases - the hardware has gotten really great but it's still hampered by the "scaled up ios"-approach.
I'd welcome the option to switch between iPadOS abd OSX on an M1 ipad, although we all know that this is never going to happen (at least officially). It'd be far from ideal (although it worked fine on an 11" MBA with far less screen resolution), but still better than iPadOS today. Just compare the endlessly nested and complicated settings app vs. system preferences on OSX. This is not going to be solved by forever adding new functions to an OS that was first developed for a 480x320 3,5" display.