Trivia time: Which expansion team had the best win-loss record in their first season?
Angels in '61?
Trivia time: Which expansion team had the best win-loss record in their first season?
Angels in '61?
We have a winner. They finished 70-91, good enough for eighth place. Of course in a way they weren't a true expansion team, since they'd played for years before they were promoted as members of the PCL.
I'm not sure I'd call it a promotion, since just the name was left over from the PCL though. All the players were from an expansion draft and spring tryouts, not from the old minor-league team. The Padres did the same thing when they joined the NL in 1969, adopting a local minor-league team's name, although with the Padres the same guy owned both. From the fans' standpoint, it qualified as a promotion though!
The reason that I guessed it was the Angels is that I did remember reading that the Angels were actually in first place almost to the All-Star break in their first season, something that was really baffling in the first-ever expansion year for MLB.
I can't believe the A's let Harden go!
I can't believe the A's let Harden go!it's not like they're out of the playoff chase. At the same time, i wonder if Beane has something else up his sleeve...
I believe some of the first players were PCL Angels players, and they originally played at the old Angels park, though technically only the franchise name was original to the club. I knew someone (quite a bit older than myself) who grew up in Los Angeles and who was always a rabid Cubs fan. This mystified me for a while until I asked him, which earned me a lecture about the origins the Los Angeles Angels as a farm team of the Cubs. I could easily forgive myself for not knowing this having grown up on the East Coast and after this era ended, but I'm not sure he ever did.
The Cubs also held spring training on Catalina Island for a time. Great location, but who else did they play exhibition games against?
NEW YORK -- Hal Steinbrenner emerged from a closed-door meeting in manager Joe Girardi's office Wednesday to say he was disappointed in the New York Yankees' performance this year yet reluctant to trade prospects for veterans in hopes of a spark.
He cited injuries plus inconsistent hitting and pitching. He specifically mentioned the performances of young pitchers Phil Hughes and Ian Kennedy, counted on to be regulars in the rotation but both are on the disabled list after combining to go 0-7 in 15 appearances.
"The young pitchers at the beginning of year," he said, "it was upsetting at times. It wasn't what we thought. It didn't go exactly the way we thought it would go. But, you know, that's the way it is. We're highly confident in Kennedy and Hughes and that they're going to come back strong when they do come back."
Dodgers will change hitting coach again
Mike Easler will be replaced by Don Mattingly after the All-Star break.
With the Dodgers' offense ranking among the worst in the league, the club is expected to change hitting coaches at the All-Star break by replacing Mike Easler with Don Mattingly, according to sources close to the situation who requested anonymity because the move hasn't been finalized. Mattingly is due to take over when the Dodgers start the second half of the season in Arizona on July 18.
...
He was supposed to come in the package with Torre but he begged off at the last minute to deal with a divorce. The Dodgers put him on "special assignment" or some such thing in the meantime. Mattingly will have his hands full turning around the Dodger offense. Andruw Jones all by himself is a full-time project.
I worry more about the pitching holding up. The two hitters who have missed the most time with injuries are Jones and Nomar, neither of whom have hit well so far this season. The one injured hitter who I have at least some confidence in (Furcal) might be back for September, but who knows how much he could contribute. So I think it's a stretch to think the veterans will lead an offensive resurgence. I think the young guys can and will hit better than they have been.
Maybe Mattingly will be part of the solution. I don't know, but I can hope.
Is it sad that all I hope for is a playoff berth and a chance at the postseason crapshoot?
I might agree if I wasn't feeling much the same way myself.
Speaking of progressing (and regressing) to the mean, I see nearly everyone on this team as underperforming their abilities for most of the first half. The fact that they haven't been blown out suggests that averaging out might work well for the team in the second half.
It's also been a loooooonnnnnngggg time since the Dodgers had this many young players at the same time, which is a nice change. I figure that at least two of the old-guy triad of Kent, Nomar, and Lowe won't be back next season, which means they'll be getting even younger unless they trade for another veteran. I'm looking forward to seeing how many of the youngsters turn into something special.
It is unprofessional and childish is what it is. I don't know why he hasn't been fined for this crap yet.During a pitching change in the 6th inning of the Sox/Twins game yesterday.
crazy mother****er.
Globe