Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I know I'm late on this...

Could be. I have an engine squeezed between the rear wheels. Another car I can think of that always looks like it has a much wider rear track is the 911.

The 911 has/needs a wider track because it's genuinely rear engined (engine sits behind the rear axle) and therefore needs the stability that an increase in the track provides, imagine the consequences if they reduced it so that it was narrower than the front... :eek:

Again engine between them...

But it's the actual location of the engine that differs here, the Elise isn't necessarily unusual in having a wider rear track even though it's rear-mid engined, the Cayman has a wider one too, unlike other rear-mid engined cars such as the F430 for example.

I'd hazard a guess that the reason for this may well be because the Elise uses a relatively light engine, and they've increased the rear track to compensate and provide stability and neutrality, where as the heavier rear-mid engined cars (F430, Gallardo etc) have a narrower rear track than the front (grip equation and all).

Anyway, to the topic at hand...

I generally like the simplicity of this years cars, though I'm still not fond of the visual balance between the front/rear wings.

I'm struck how reminiscent the nose of the BMW is the 2nd photo posted by patchyderm to the walrus nose of the FW26.

The Renault's hideous though. :p
 
z9upwa3g4.jpg


i like this shot, 3/4 profile. you see beneath the nose and above, then feel the natural flow of the car and curve of the body going to the back of the car.


kt19ogoq2.jpg


i love the line of this from the nose back to the cock pit... ;)
 
I'm struck how reminiscent the nose of the BMW is the 2nd photo posted by patchyderm to the walrus nose of the FW26.

The Renault's hideous though. :p

I was thinking the BMW looked familiar. I wonder if Williams could resurrect it within the regulations. Could be an interesting solution ...

The Renault would be more elegant if it were mainly yellow - its the ING orange that ruins the lines of it. Saying that, its is their sponsors that have probably kept them in the sport - Honda hadn't had major sponsors for a couple of years, going sponsor-free for their Earth cars.
 

I don't see any cheating, just clever thinking. Any team complaining is only doing so because they know they don't have enough time to or can't copy it.

Honda hadn't had major sponsors for a couple of years, going sponsor-free for their Earth cars.

I'd always thought it was more along the lines of going for the Earth cars because they were sponsor free :p
 
The new tall & narrow rear wing looks a little odd, but the rest of the car has a much cleaner look. I like it.

Ditto ... the twiddly bits on the bodywork was getting out of hand ... the cleaner body looks nice but the front wing looks really boxey and the rear wing i'm struggling to come to terms with its appearance ... makes the car look really unballanced.... but i totally understand the concept of mechanical vs aero grip and what its meant to do

Hope its worth it
 
That thing looks so weird! It's like a huge chunck is missing. Certainly one of the more unique cars this season.
 
Based on the experiences during tests over the winter and this quote from Newey I can't help be feel scared for both RB drivers.

"We use a battery storage system, which is heavy and therefore affects weight distribution on the car. After everything is packaged in the usual manner, driver, fuel cell, engine, gearbox, you then have to find somewhere for KERS, while maintaining fuel tank capacity and achieving the weight distribution target. RB5 carries its KERS in the base of the fuel tank."
:eek:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.