Obviously the whole 'weakened team' rule is currently silly and unenforceable.
I see only 2 potential ways to fix it (and the first one is never going to happen):
1. Each choose a number of players (say 14) to be labelled as 'first choice'. Each starting 11 much feature a minimum number (say 7 or 8) of first choice players. This of course will never happen because players who don't get labelled as first choice will not be happy.
2. More that half (6 or more) of your starting 11 must have featured (either started or came on a sub) in your last match. I feel that this has potential, since it seems the outcry occurs when a team makes wholesale changes from one match to the next.
Anyway, I think 2 is feasible (or at least more feasible that what happens now)
However, my biggest moan is this: Why doesn't UEFA let the winner of the Europa League gain qualification the the Champions League the next season? It would immediately make the Europa a competition that clubs actually wanted to win, not avoid like the plague.
I see only 2 potential ways to fix it (and the first one is never going to happen):
1. Each choose a number of players (say 14) to be labelled as 'first choice'. Each starting 11 much feature a minimum number (say 7 or 8) of first choice players. This of course will never happen because players who don't get labelled as first choice will not be happy.
2. More that half (6 or more) of your starting 11 must have featured (either started or came on a sub) in your last match. I feel that this has potential, since it seems the outcry occurs when a team makes wholesale changes from one match to the next.
Anyway, I think 2 is feasible (or at least more feasible that what happens now)
However, my biggest moan is this: Why doesn't UEFA let the winner of the Europa League gain qualification the the Champions League the next season? It would immediately make the Europa a competition that clubs actually wanted to win, not avoid like the plague.