Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
State College was a mess last night. News vans and light poles were tipped and students were throwing rocks at police. It broke up pretty quickly though.

Sadly the students were doing it for the wrong reason, if anything they should have marched in support of the victims not riot because a coach got fired.

That being said the real criminal is Jerry Sandusky, but everyone else who knew about it should have been fired (including McQueary who for some unfathomable reason still has his job.)

Since the media only shows Joe Paterno's face, here is Jerry Sandusky:
 

Attachments

  • pict.png
    pict.png
    483.9 KB · Views: 86
I (obviously) can't speak for you or anyone else on this board, but if I found out that one of my subordinates was raping children in the shower of my building, I would have done a lot more than make a phone call.

Paterno called in the university's vice president and the athletic director and met with them face to face to relay what he was told.

Again, he had no first hand knowledge of what happened, so in one corner he had a graduate student telling him he saw something, and the guy who heads up the police department saying there was nothing going on. That's what he got caught in the middle of.

Now if Paterno himself witnessed any of it, he would be in a good position to refute the police's findings and do something about it himself - but again, he wasn't in that position. Most people, not even a well-tenured football coach, make it their business to go against their employers AND the police by taking matters into their own hands.

Yet you're inclined to believe that while he can fire a coach whose players aren't performing on the field, he has no say over firing a coach who was raping little boys?

Sandusky wasn't a coach, or even one of Paterno's employees, at the time. He was a professor emeritus. And again, the police said it wasn't happening.

A coach who had already been investigated once (back in 1998) for sexually abusing a child in a shower?

Investigated and cleared. That failure is (once again) on the police, not on Paterno. You can argue all you want for how powerful Paterno is or is not, but he doesn't have the clout to tell the police whom to arrest and for what.
 
Feel bad for Paterno. People want blood (even if it's the wrong blood) and he is a big name (just look at some of the posters in this thread). Hopefully he still gets his pension or whatever would of been offered at retirement and I feel bad for him that his name will be associated with this in the books.
 
Paterno called in the university's vice president and the athletic director and met with them face to face to relay what he was told.

Again, he had no first hand knowledge of what happened, so in one corner he had a graduate student telling him he saw something, and the guy who heads up the police department saying there was nothing going on. That's what he got caught in the middle of.

Now if Paterno himself witnessed any of it, he would be in a good position to refute the police's findings and do something about it himself - but again, he wasn't in that position. Most people, not even a well-tenured football coach, make it their business to go against their employers AND the police by taking matters into their own hands.

No one was above Paterno at Penn State. NO ONE. What he said, went. Always.

Sandusky wasn't a coach, or even one of Paterno's employees, at the time. He was a professor emeritus.

Because he was forced to retire from coaching after being caught raping a child.

Investigated and cleared. That failure is (once again) on the police, not on Paterno. You can argue all you want for how powerful Paterno is or is not, but he doesn't have the clout to tell the police whom to arrest and for what.

Actually, some in the local media are arguing just the opposite. Paterno led a coverup, which let countless boys get raped by Sandusky himself and (if rumors be true) let an entire child prostitution ring operate for another decade-plus.

All because Paterno refused to do the right thing. Just sickening.
 
Paterno is not a victim here
Innocent boys are

Paterno is not guilty of molesting boys
He is guilty of enabling a molester to molest boys

Paterno doesn't get a pass for reporting what he was told
He should have distanced himself from the individual and refused to allow him access to the facilities regardless of what the police did or did not do

Paterno isn't innocent by being ignorant
He shouldn't have looked the other way, he should have ferreted out the truth himself

A. Guy is accused of raping little boys on your campus in your facility on your watch
B. Guy is never allowed to be with a little boy on your campus in your facility ever again... period... guilty or not

But, but... JoPa didn't see it...
Ok, no argument there, but he can damn sure make sure it never happens by never allowing an opportunity for it to happen

Regardless of what the police do...
Call the guy in
Ask him for the truth whether you get it or not
Tell him you are protecting the boys, him, yourself, the program by avoiding any appearance of impropriety
Be the leader everybody thought you were

I would rather be remembered for barring an innocent man from my facility than for enabling a child molester

Feel free to disagree
 
The fact that he was forced to retire in 1999 means they knew something was going on. He never should of had access to the campus after that. Joe knew then there was a problem but swept it under the rug as to not make the program look bad. Once the second incident happened on campus that should have been the last straw. Again Paterno swept it under the rug. Just because the DA doesn't want to bring Joe into this doesn't mean he has clean hands.
 
The fact that he was forced to retire in 1999 means they knew something was going on. He never should of had access to the campus after that. Joe knew then there was a problem but swept it under the rug as to not make the program look bad.

He's not the one who swept it under the rug - it was everybody else.

Don't believe me? From the grand jury report (which too many people seem to be unwilling to read):

...his mother immediately questioned him about this and was upset to learn the boy had showered with Sandusky. She reported the incident to University Police who investigated. After a lengthy investigation by University Police Detective Ronald Shreffler, the investigation was closed after then-Centre County District Attorney Ray Gricar decided there would be no criminal charges. Shreffler testified that he was told to close the investigation by the director of the campus police, Thomas Harmon. That investigation included a second child, B.K., also 11, who was subjected to nearly identical treatment in the shower as Victim 6, according to Detective Schreffler.

Detective Schreffler testified that he and State College Police Department Detective Ralph Ralston, with the consent of the mother of Victim 6, eavesdropped on two conversations the mother of Victim 6 had with Sandusky on May 13, 1998, and May 19, 1998. The mother of Victim 6 confronted Sandusky about showering with her son, the effect it had on her son, whether Sandusky had sexual feelings when he hugged her naked son in the shower and where Victim 6's buttocks were when Sandusky hugged him. Sandusky said he had showered with other boys and Victim 6's mother tried to make Sandusky promise never to shower with a boy again but he would not. She asked him if his "private parts" touched Victim 6 when he bear-hugged him. Sandusky replied, "I don't think so...maybe." At the conclusion of the second conversation, after Sandusky was told he could not see Victim 6 anymore, Sandusky said, "I understand. I was wrong. I wish I could get forgiveness. I know I won't get it from you. I wish I were dead." Detective Ralston and the mother of Victim 6 confirm these conversations.

Jerry Lauro, and investigator with the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, testified that during the 1998 investigation, Sandusky was interviewed on June 1, 1998, by Lauro and Detective Schreffler. Sandusky admitted showering naked with Victim 6, admitted to hugging Victim 6 while in teh shower and admitted that it was wrong. Detective Schreffler advised Sandusky not to shower with any child again and Sandusky said that he would not.

Here, in a single passage of the (largely un-read by members of this thread) grand jury report, the following entities CONFIRMED that they KNEW what Sandusky had done:

University Police
Centre County District Attorney
State College Police Department
Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
the child's Mother

Sandusky ADMITTED to these people what he had done, and NONE of them did ANYTHING beyond make him promise not to do it again. Yet you people vilify Paterno??

You lose a TON of credibility with me when you defy logic this hard.
 
He's not the one who swept it under the rug - it was everybody else.

Don't believe me? From the grand jury report (which too many people seem to be unwilling to read):



Here, in a single passage of the (largely un-read by members of this thread) grand jury report, the following entities CONFIRMED that they KNEW what Sandusky had done:

University Police
Centre County District Attorney
State College Police Department
Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
the child's Mother

Sandusky ADMITTED to these people what he had done, and NONE of them did ANYTHING beyond make him promise not to do it again. Yet you people vilify Paterno??

You lose a TON of credibility with me when you defy logic this hard.
Paterno is the most powerful person at Penn State, he damn well knew. He knows everything about everyone there.

How can the janitors know more than Paterno?
 
Paterno is the most powerful person at Penn State, he damn well knew. He knows everything about everyone there.

How can the janitors know more than Paterno?

He reported it. The police investigated and did not press charges. Paterno didn't see it happen. He reported hearsay.

Ok so if your friend is accused of something and the police investigate and say nothing happened are you going to tell him, "well just in case I want you to leave me alone forever".

Come on guys.
 
He reported it. The police investigated and did not press charges. Paterno didn't see it happen. He reported hearsay.

Ok so if your friend is accused of something and the police investigate and say nothing happened are you going to tell him, "well just in case I want you to leave me alone forever".

Come on guys.
There was more than one reported case. If the police dropped the ball investigate them too.
 
Sandusky ADMITTED to these people what he had done, and NONE of them did ANYTHING beyond make him promise not to do it again. Yet you people vilify Paterno??

You lose a TON of credibility with me when you defy logic this hard.

I've said they are ALL guilty, not just Paterno
There is enough guilt for everyone

And I don't want to vilify him, I just want to hold him accountable
Along with everyone else involved

Yes, just because the police say nothing happened, you STILL distance yourself for the good of everyone involved

You make sure there is never an opportunity for this happening on your watch

Nobody gets a pass on this
While Paterno may not be guilty of a crime
He is guilty of poor judgement and lack of leadership

If MY friend was accused of this, I would damn well be sure to keep an eye on things for the kids protection, his protection and the program
I would not want there to ever be another opportunity for an accusation

Paterno is the face of this... the price of leadership or lack thereof
But the others are just as culpable
And they all need to be accountable
 
Here, in a single passage of the (largely un-read by members of this thread) grand jury report, the following entities CONFIRMED that they KNEW what Sandusky had done:

University Police
Centre County District Attorney
State College Police Department
Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
the child's Mother

Sandusky ADMITTED to these people what he had done, and NONE of them did ANYTHING beyond make him promise not to do it again. Yet you people vilify Paterno??

You lose a TON of credibility with me when you defy logic this hard.

OJ was found not guilty.

And I've never said Paterno is the only guilty party. I've said repeatedly that everyone involved should be dragged through the streets. You're willing to give Paterno a pass because McCreary "only" told him that he saw Sandusky fondle the boy in the shower. That's enough for me to know that Paterno (and everyone else involved) should be brutalized for looking the other way.
 
Hey get back in here. You can be a Sooner fan. If you want to be the best, that is. Up to you. :p

BOOMER!! Like that?

Question, though...Is there a way to incorporate blue into their uniforms? I prefer my teams to have Blue in them. I've been negotiating with the Jets for years to get rid of those God awful green uniforms.
 
BOOMER!! Like that?

Question, though...Is there a way to incorporate blue into their uniforms? I prefer my teams to have Blue in them. I've been negotiating with the Jets for years to get rid of those God awful green uniforms.

Only if somehow it rubs off of other jerseys as we are knocking people down and taking names. ;)
 
Dawgs - Auburn will likely decide the East this week
Dawgs control their destiny and a win at home against the Tiggers likely locks it up
Only Kentucky would stand in the way

SCarolina still gets the Gators and that should be a toss up
A Carolina win and a Dawg loss puts the Cocks back in the SEC Championship Game
 
Paterno is the most powerful person at Penn State, he damn well knew. He knows everything about everyone there.

Paterno isn't a Deity. He, like the rest of us, knows only two groups of things: (1) what he sees/hears himself, and (2) what someone tells him. And he didn't witness a damn thing - that leaves only - ONLY - what McQueary told him. And he passed that along, which was his duty.

How can the janitors know more than Paterno?

You still haven't read the report, have you? :rolleyes:

Here's a spoiler: the janitor walked in on it. Paterno wasn't in the friggin' building when it happened. And nobody (janitor included) told him about it.

You're willing to give Paterno a pass because McCreary "only" told him that he saw Sandusky fondle the boy in the shower. That's enough for me to know that Paterno (and everyone else involved) should be brutalized for looking the other way.

I know you're not as stupid as that statement makes you sound, Ignatius - he did not look the other way.

I'm willing to give Paterno a pass because he did what any rational and responsible person would have done. So many of you are speaking with the benefit of (1) hindsight and (2) being an outsider. Nobody knows for sure what they'll do in a hypothetical situation. The reality is that any one of us would have reported what we were told, or make sure the authorities already knew about it. And if the authorities found no wrongdoing (their fault, not Joe's), almost all of us would drop it. Anyone who says otherwise simply refuses to admit the truth, in my opinion.
 
There are reports that in 2002 the janitor that walked into the shower told all the other janitors right after it happened. You mean to tell me that Paterno who has his hands in everything didn't hear this news? I don't believe for a second that he is that shielded from his own program.
 
There are reports that in 2002 the janitor that walked into the shower told all the other janitors right after it happened. You mean to tell me that Paterno who has his hands in everything didn't hear this news? I don't believe for a second that he is that shielded from his own program.

Any janitor who walks in on a guy molesting a boy needs to beat the **** out of the guy on the spot, not run to tell his buddy janitors

Jus' sayin
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.