Oh boy.. if that Business Insider rumor is true, then all hell really is going to break loose. Imagine the backlash if his "charity" is essentially a prostitution service for rich donors..
Just unfathomable.
Oh boy.. if that Business Insider rumor is true, then all hell really is going to break loose. Imagine the backlash if his "charity" is essentially a prostitution service for rich donors..
I (obviously) can't speak for you or anyone else on this board, but if I found out that one of my subordinates was raping children in the shower of my building, I would have done a lot more than make a phone call.
Yet you're inclined to believe that while he can fire a coach whose players aren't performing on the field, he has no say over firing a coach who was raping little boys?
A coach who had already been investigated once (back in 1998) for sexually abusing a child in a shower?
Paterno called in the university's vice president and the athletic director and met with them face to face to relay what he was told.
Again, he had no first hand knowledge of what happened, so in one corner he had a graduate student telling him he saw something, and the guy who heads up the police department saying there was nothing going on. That's what he got caught in the middle of.
Now if Paterno himself witnessed any of it, he would be in a good position to refute the police's findings and do something about it himself - but again, he wasn't in that position. Most people, not even a well-tenured football coach, make it their business to go against their employers AND the police by taking matters into their own hands.
Sandusky wasn't a coach, or even one of Paterno's employees, at the time. He was a professor emeritus.
Investigated and cleared. That failure is (once again) on the police, not on Paterno. You can argue all you want for how powerful Paterno is or is not, but he doesn't have the clout to tell the police whom to arrest and for what.
The fact that he was forced to retire in 1999 means they knew something was going on. He never should of had access to the campus after that. Joe knew then there was a problem but swept it under the rug as to not make the program look bad.
...his mother immediately questioned him about this and was upset to learn the boy had showered with Sandusky. She reported the incident to University Police who investigated. After a lengthy investigation by University Police Detective Ronald Shreffler, the investigation was closed after then-Centre County District Attorney Ray Gricar decided there would be no criminal charges. Shreffler testified that he was told to close the investigation by the director of the campus police, Thomas Harmon. That investigation included a second child, B.K., also 11, who was subjected to nearly identical treatment in the shower as Victim 6, according to Detective Schreffler.
Detective Schreffler testified that he and State College Police Department Detective Ralph Ralston, with the consent of the mother of Victim 6, eavesdropped on two conversations the mother of Victim 6 had with Sandusky on May 13, 1998, and May 19, 1998. The mother of Victim 6 confronted Sandusky about showering with her son, the effect it had on her son, whether Sandusky had sexual feelings when he hugged her naked son in the shower and where Victim 6's buttocks were when Sandusky hugged him. Sandusky said he had showered with other boys and Victim 6's mother tried to make Sandusky promise never to shower with a boy again but he would not. She asked him if his "private parts" touched Victim 6 when he bear-hugged him. Sandusky replied, "I don't think so...maybe." At the conclusion of the second conversation, after Sandusky was told he could not see Victim 6 anymore, Sandusky said, "I understand. I was wrong. I wish I could get forgiveness. I know I won't get it from you. I wish I were dead." Detective Ralston and the mother of Victim 6 confirm these conversations.
Jerry Lauro, and investigator with the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, testified that during the 1998 investigation, Sandusky was interviewed on June 1, 1998, by Lauro and Detective Schreffler. Sandusky admitted showering naked with Victim 6, admitted to hugging Victim 6 while in teh shower and admitted that it was wrong. Detective Schreffler advised Sandusky not to shower with any child again and Sandusky said that he would not.
Paterno is the most powerful person at Penn State, he damn well knew. He knows everything about everyone there.He's not the one who swept it under the rug - it was everybody else.
Don't believe me? From the grand jury report (which too many people seem to be unwilling to read):
Here, in a single passage of the (largely un-read by members of this thread) grand jury report, the following entities CONFIRMED that they KNEW what Sandusky had done:
University Police
Centre County District Attorney
State College Police Department
Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
the child's Mother
Sandusky ADMITTED to these people what he had done, and NONE of them did ANYTHING beyond make him promise not to do it again. Yet you people vilify Paterno??
You lose a TON of credibility with me when you defy logic this hard.
Paterno is the most powerful person at Penn State, he damn well knew. He knows everything about everyone there.
How can the janitors know more than Paterno?
There was more than one reported case. If the police dropped the ball investigate them too.He reported it. The police investigated and did not press charges. Paterno didn't see it happen. He reported hearsay.
Ok so if your friend is accused of something and the police investigate and say nothing happened are you going to tell him, "well just in case I want you to leave me alone forever".
Come on guys.
Sandusky ADMITTED to these people what he had done, and NONE of them did ANYTHING beyond make him promise not to do it again. Yet you people vilify Paterno??
You lose a TON of credibility with me when you defy logic this hard.
There was more than one reported case. If the police dropped the ball investigate them too.
So who's ready to see Virginia Tech lose tonight?
My two favorite teams are the Dawgs and whoever is playing Ga Tech
Go Hokies
My two favorite teams are Oklahoma and whoever can beat closely ranked teams to them.
My two favorite teams are Seton Hall and whoever is playing St. John's. Wait....we don't have football teams.
*Slowly backs out of thread*
Here, in a single passage of the (largely un-read by members of this thread) grand jury report, the following entities CONFIRMED that they KNEW what Sandusky had done:
University Police
Centre County District Attorney
State College Police Department
Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
the child's Mother
Sandusky ADMITTED to these people what he had done, and NONE of them did ANYTHING beyond make him promise not to do it again. Yet you people vilify Paterno??
You lose a TON of credibility with me when you defy logic this hard.
Hey get back in here. You can be a Sooner fan. If you want to be the best, that is. Up to you.![]()
BOOMER!! Like that?
Question, though...Is there a way to incorporate blue into their uniforms? I prefer my teams to have Blue in them. I've been negotiating with the Jets for years to get rid of those God awful green uniforms.
Only if somehow it rubs off of other jerseys as we are knocking people down and taking names.![]()
Paterno is the most powerful person at Penn State, he damn well knew. He knows everything about everyone there.
How can the janitors know more than Paterno?
You're willing to give Paterno a pass because McCreary "only" told him that he saw Sandusky fondle the boy in the shower. That's enough for me to know that Paterno (and everyone else involved) should be brutalized for looking the other way.
There are reports that in 2002 the janitor that walked into the shower told all the other janitors right after it happened. You mean to tell me that Paterno who has his hands in everything didn't hear this news? I don't believe for a second that he is that shielded from his own program.