Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well said ! I'll wait until 2012 iMac comes out.

----
I'm against touch screens, beside iPhone ofcourse. ;)

I, too, am waiting for the next iMac release so I can buy my first iMac, and this possibility has also been considered.

What do we know that can totally outshine the 2011 model, though?

I will likely go for the next release because I'm running out of self-control. =p
 
why do people still think an iTouch is likely to happen? Didn't Steve himself say in the tests they had done in the lab they found it uncomfortable to use?

Not sure if they have it in Indigo Book Stores but up here they have a "iMac like" set up, it even uses the Apple Wired Keyboard with Number Pad. The ARM of course doesn't fold but the TOUCH itself works and I like it.

Having the ARM fold down is a must for me though. I guess this is why I think it's possible.
 
There seems to be 5 or 6 different laptop options, but only 2 desktop options (Mac Pro and iMac). So, one thing I'd like to see is a high-end boutique iMac as an option.

Let the design engineers have a field day every few years by putting all the highest end, cutting edge components in it, create a slightly modified but unique iMac chassis, perhaps with a choice of colors, and sell it as a luxury option 'collectors limited edition' at $3500 or something for those who would want it.

Depending on the design, I'd probably be all over it.
 
There seems to be 5 or 6 different laptop options, but only 2 desktop options (Mac Pro and iMac). So, one thing I'd like to see is a high-end boutique iMac as an option.

Let the design engineers have a field day every few years by putting all the highest end, cutting edge components in it, create a slightly modified but unique iMac chassis, perhaps with a choice of colors, and sell it as a luxury option 'collectors limited edition' at $3500 or something for those who would want it.

Depending on the design, I'd probably be all over it.

Most likely it's not worth it to invest lots of money on designing such a custom product and then price it so that only very few people can afford it. They would have to sell quite a lot of those ultimate iMacs to make it worth it and the higher the price, the less people can afford it. Apple is more and more moving towards mainstream market so I doubt we will ever see an iMac like that.
 
why do people still think an iTouch is likely to happen? Didn't Steve himself say in the tests they had done in the lab they found it uncomfortable to use?

I know right? You already have a magic mouse and a magic trackpad, what else do you want?!? Throwing my arms in an attempt to edit a freaking video is just foolish. I mean, im already tired from typing on an iPad... :p
 
As I said, they could take the iPad and hook it up, just say it was a real iMac. They could start on the OS for the iPad and make it just look more like a full OS for desktops.
My thoughts above were just imagination as an outcome of my fear for more things from apple that I do not like. I get this paranoia since there are people all the way saying "Oh, I definitely would buy an iMac touch" (not seeing how ridiculous it is to leave your fingerprints everywhere on the screen were you want to look at it while working).


I totally agree, but there are those other people that like not so useful things.

I work for an Apple Specialist, and I can tell you, every single day, I have to clean fingerprints off the 27" iMac. Really obvious, repeated ones right on the Dock. A lot of people just don't understand that iPad isn't a Mac.

Every day, I hear comments, "does it have a touchscreen yet?" and "probably next year."

Ironically, of the same token, also every single day, people ask me if the Magic Mouse works on the iPad, which sounds to me an awful lot like using chopsticks to eat Rice Krispies.

Despite this, I have to say that I don't think your paranoia is well-founded. Apple has *never* been one to cowtow to what customers say they want. They've always been a company that does its best to figure out what customers really need, and providing them with that instead. And at the end of the day, everyone usually ends up better off.

Apple was aware of the "tablet PCs" that were on the market for years and years before the iPad came out. There is a reason they didn't make them then, and it's the same reason they won't make them now: operating systems designed to work with a mouse do not function well with touch screens, and vice versa. Apple wouldn't have bothered to make iOS if they thought this wasn't the case. And they wouldn't have spent millions creating the best possible trackpad experience if it wasn't the case. If you read Steve Jobs's "Thoughts on Flash," he clearly lays this out.

Now, what we might see re: "touch" Macs are things like further expansion of the trackpad experience. I'd *love* to see a Safari for Mac that scales up smoothly the way MobileSafari does, rather than basically activating the "CMD+/CMD-" menu option. I also daresay there will be further and better Multitouch support across the line of Apple apps. I'll bet your boots (not mine, I like mine) that FCP8 takes advantage of these gestures; maybe even better Cocoa APIs for integrating them into third-party software
 
Most likely it's not worth it to invest lots of money on designing such a custom product and then price it so that only very few people can afford it. They would have to sell quite a lot of those ultimate iMacs to make it worth it and the higher the price, the less people can afford it. Apple is more and more moving towards mainstream market so I doubt we will ever see an iMac like that.

Yeah. Remember the 20th Anniversary Mac? Sure it was kind of cool, but it was a total flop. And I suspect Apple would look at this sort of thing as a similar product.

I just don't see why, if you had that kind of money, you wouldn't buy a Mac Pro. Is having a tower (especially one as attractive as the MP) under your desk really that objectionable?
 
I just don't see why, if you had that kind of money, you wouldn't buy a Mac Pro. Is having a tower (especially one as attractive as the MP) under your desk really that objectionable?

I wish Apple had something between the mini and the Pro. They could put iMac parts inside a mini tower, make it easy to get into, offer a little bit of expandability, put jacks and ports on the front like the Pro, pocket the money they would have spent for the screen, sell it for $1500 and I'd buy one today. The Mac Pro is simply too big, too costly and overkill for my needs.
 
I wish Apple had something between the mini and the Pro. They could put iMac parts inside a mini tower, make it easy to get into, offer a little bit of expandability, put jacks and ports on the front like the Pro, pocket the money they would have spent for the screen, sell it for $1500 and I'd buy one today. The Mac Pro is simply too big, too costly and overkill for my needs.

That would kill the base Mac Pro as iMac is about as fast as the base MP. Apple could easily reduce the price of Mac Pro to around 1500$ as that's the price of a similarly specced Dell.
 
That would kill the base Mac Pro as iMac is about as fast as the base MP. Apple could easily reduce the price of Mac Pro to around 1500$ as that's the price of a similarly specced Dell.

They have the Macbook and the MacbookPro. How about an actual Mac (headless iMac) and the Mac Pro?

As a long time Mac user I just want a computer a little bit better than the mini that lets me choose my monitor.
Right now it is $699 for the mini or $2499 for the Pro. Big gap in size, capability and price.
 
They have the Macbook and the MacbookPro. How about an actual Mac (headless iMac) and the Mac Pro?

As a long time Mac user I just want a computer a little bit better than the mini that lets me choose my monitor.
Right now it is $699 for the mini or $2499 for the Pro. Big gap in size, capability and price.

dont start ;) we have been talking about an xMac for YEARS. i cant see apple changing - given that they are moving away from the desktop scene.
 
dont start ;) we have been talking about an xMac for YEARS. i cant see apple changing - given that they are moving away from the desktop scene.

All I know is that I am a long time Mac user that isn't finding a Mac that fits my needs. If Apple is cool with that there is nothing I can do.
 
OK,
I know I don't post much of this forum but I NEED advice.
I have an old school G4 867 PM from '01 running Tiger with 1.25 GB of RAM with 120 GB HD. I WILL be getting the 2011 iMac as my PC's just aren't serving my needs either. (I use iTunes as well as edit music using Audicity and Final Cut Pro) I am safe buying as the next iMac won't come out till Feb 2012 at the earliest??
 
OK,
I know I don't post much of this forum but I NEED advice.
I have an old school G4 867 PM from '01 running Tiger with 1.25 GB of RAM with 120 GB HD. I WILL be getting the 2011 iMac as my PC's just aren't serving my needs either. (I use iTunes as well as edit music using Audicity and Final Cut Pro) I am safe buying as the next iMac won't come out till Feb 2012 at the earliest??

The next iMac (the revision that'll replace the current i3/i5/i7 models) will be coming out much, much sooner than Feb '12.
 
i hope apple doesn't go through with the touchscreen iMac. I have an HP Touchsmart and the touchscreen is not comfortable to use and of course it leaves fingerprints all over the screen. :mad: oh and worst of all it's not a Mac lol :p
 
Last edited:
There seems to be 5 or 6 different laptop options, but only 2 desktop options (Mac Pro and iMac). So, one thing I'd like to see is a high-end boutique iMac as an option.

Let the design engineers have a field day every few years by putting all the highest end, cutting edge components in it, create a slightly modified but unique iMac chassis, perhaps with a choice of colors, and sell it as a luxury option 'collectors limited edition' at $3500 or something for those who would want it.

Depending on the design, I'd probably be all over it.

Interesting idea... I think the public image would be bad for apple though. They are already criticized for being too expensive... interesting idea though. Car companies do that with cars... why not create an SS iMac?
 
I heard the next iMac was going to have a touchscreen :eek: but it is probably just a rumor and I don't think there will be any external changes. As for internally, who knows, july is far out to be predicting things.

Unlikely, in the most portable of computers (i.e. the Macbook Air) they chose not to go that route claiming that it was not as friendly of an interface as the touchpad.
 
All I know is that I am a long time Mac user that isn't finding a Mac that fits my needs. If Apple is cool with that there is nothing I can do.

You can try and paint this as an "Apple's forgetting who their friends are" story all you want, but Apple has never offered a machine in the range you're talking about. Users who've wanted that sort of thing have always either gone bigger to the Mac Pro or gone hackintosh. And frankly, the iMac hasn't ever been a better value than it is today.

also: You could probably get a used Mac Pro that's on a similar benchmark power level to today's iMacs for the price range you're talking about.
 
You can try and paint this as an "Apple's forgetting who their friends are" story all you want, but Apple has never offered a machine in the range you're talking about. Users who've wanted that sort of thing have always either gone bigger to the Mac Pro or gone hackintosh. And frankly, the iMac hasn't ever been a better value than it is today.

also: You could probably get a used Mac Pro that's on a similar benchmark power level to today's iMacs for the price range you're talking about.

They don't update the Mac Pro's that often though which is a bummer... even if you had the money to spend on them, you would want them to be as continuously updated as the iMacs.
 
They don't update the Mac Pro's that often though which is a bummer... even if you had the money to spend on them, you would want them to be as continuously updated as the iMacs.

I'll give you that one, no question. They've also neglected the MBPs a bit much lately.
 
All I know is that I am a long time Mac user that isn't finding a Mac that fits my needs. If Apple is cool with that there is nothing I can do.

i can sympathise with this point actually. i am also a long time mac user (apple ][e anybody? :)).

for desktops purely, i have an iMac i7 - the screen was the main deal maker for me, the internal storage capacity SUCKS. RAM options are "ok" and the CPU/GPU can be upgraded (i am considering doing it) for about $800aus total.

for my file server i have turned to using a hackintosh with OSX Server installed on it - i find that MUCH easier to use hardware wise then my imac which requires external (and slow) firewire 800 drives if i want additional storage.

meh.

apple - make an xMac!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.