it's 2011 bro, if apple do this in 2006,It's the first ever quad core laptop.
that will be different story.
it's 2011 bro, if apple do this in 2006,It's the first ever quad core laptop.
And how many people would be doing all that at the same time?
It's the first ever quad core laptop. Anywhere.
Is this really the first quad core laptop? If so, why didn't Apple say that?
And how many people would be doing all that at the same time?
I'd smell thatSeriously? That's your argument? They stuck with the Aluminum design much longer than we've been on this design.
Do you guys smell that?
Is this really the first quad core laptop? If so, why didn't Apple say that?
january 2003:
+![]()
![]()
september 2003:
+
+![]()
![]()
april 2004:
see september 2003
january 2005:
see september 2003 and april 2004
october 2005:
+![]()
![]()
january 2006:
![]()
april 2006:
![]()
october 2006:
+![]()
![]()
june 2007:
+![]()
![]()
february 2008:
+![]()
![]()
Why change the design? most if not all the reviews i have seen in the last 2-3 years have never complained about the design, infact it's been applauded over here by reviewers in the uk. I have had many laptops ( mostly windows) in that time, alienware.........garish. Asus.......plastic, pcspecialist........plastic, sony.......getting there.
I always looked at people with a macbook pro in envy at the cool design as i pull out my laptop in plastic black!![]()
I agree - the unibody design is truly one for the history books of excellent aesthetic design.
So I guess we shouldn't think of better designs? We've arrived at the end of the product's evolution?
Or you could have: mouse (as some people might prefer it over a trackpad), phone, headphones (yes, some headphones use usb).And how many people would be doing all that at the same time?
It's the first ever quad core laptop. Anywhere. That's significant.
It's simply more convenient to have more ports. For example, TM drive should basically be plugged in constantly. That takes one. Add a flash drive, two. iPod, three. Printer, four. Even without the iPod, that's three USB ports that you may need to use at once, not to mention they are so close together that it's impossible to use both with a lot of flash drives. Poor design choice.
So I guess we shouldn't think of better designs? We've arrived at the end of the product's evolution?
1) ipad
2) iphone
3) time machine drive
Seeing the highly anticipated but actually underwhelming and forgettable "upgrade" to the Macbook Pro line signals the end of Apple's innovation and ingenuity. Seems to me like they have given up on building the greatest ever product with every upgrade and are following the usual "incremental" upgrade paths that most other boring computer companies go with.
If anything, keeping the same design longer means it's timeless.
So I guess we shouldn't think of better designs? We've arrived at the end of the product's evolution?