Ivy Bridge is 6 months old... how is that new tech?
I wrote "new" in quotes. Of course it is not really new tech but newer than Sandy...
Ivy Bridge is 6 months old... how is that new tech?
I really want it to look like this one
Image
I'm guessing it's getting the iPad 2 treatment... tapered edges where the curve begins right where the glass ends.
Probably, which would explain the rumored price hike. In Apple's weird world of paradoxes, SSD is this brand new amazing exclusive cutting-edge technology that costs a billion trillion bucks, even today when it's a fairly cheap commodity item.
Instead of obsessing with thinness, I wish they would concentrate on power.
Looking at Geekbench scores, I find that:
- Top of the line PCs beat the crap out of the 2012 Mac Pro.
- The 2012 Mac Pro beats the crap out of the 2009 Mac Pro.
- The 2009 Mac Pro beats the crap out of the top of the line 2011 i7 iMac.
Heck, even the Retina MBP beats the fastest iMac. If Apple believes that the minitower computer is obsolete and that the iMac is just as good... how about making an iMac that doesn't get its ass handed to it by Apple's own laptops?
I buy Apple products because they are of the highest quality on the market.
I understand it up to a point. IMO, they reached that point with most of their products a couple of years ago. But now they're becoming like anorexics with body dysmorphia who see disgusting blubber in the mirror when everyone else sees them for the bony stick figure they are, or Michael Jackson who still saw a huge nose even when it had been reduced to a pinhead.I really do not understand Apples obsession with making everything as thin as possible.
Looking forward to case manufacturers leaking stuff.... oh waitits an iMac
![]()
Sorry, but this is "Exactly" what is wrong with Apple
If anything should "SHOUT" form over function, making a non mobile desktop computer (that is build for a serious fast task - computing) thinner just for aesthetic reasons, when it makes no difference to the products usefulness is just utterly idiotic.
Are desks collapsing due to the current iMac weight?
Can you get more iMacs on your desk if the shave another few mm off the thickness?
You you sit side on and think, if only the iMac was a bit thinner?
Do you have trouble positioning the iMac on your desk due to it's thickness?
The iMac is "Supposed" to be the General Public's serious computer (not Mac Pro) it's supposed to be technically excellent.
At the moment, due to Apples insistence on form over function it is limited to laptop chip sets as the case is too cramped and will overheat.
Internal components run HOT, yes they are within tolerance, but still hotter than they need to run. And all heat does is shorten the lifespan of electronics.
Some have suggested the constant yellow screen issues that have plagued the iMas for years is down to the heat/cramped conditions the screen has to sit within.
It just seem crazy to make something, technically worse for visual sake, esp when on a desktop the thickness is a non issue.
An iPhone and iPad and iPod all have to be limited technically in what they can do due to practical size and weight limitations, that is obvious.
An iMac should not be deliberately burdened by those limitations.
Do you really want iMacs always constricted to be not as good as they could be? Perhaps, who knows, even glued together to save that extra 0.5mm?
Dust under the screen also hasn't happened for me. Even if it did, the glass pulls right of and can be cleaned.
Ummm this one https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1101370/
I have the imac since june, and i can confirm the dust seeping thru behind the lcd, and it would look like a water come thru and dried. You can't clean it or rub it cause it's behind the lcd. Luckily apple exchange the lcd as it's under warranty.
Well, neither do I. I don't lose sleep over Apple not holding the top spot. But it gets a little silly when they completely drop off the map in performance, and when a model they stopped caring about 5 years ago is still faster than the ones they still focus on.For me, I don't live or shop by scores such as Geekbench.
Are desks collapsing due to the current iMac weight?
I think the current iMac don't need to be thinner than they're already are, but lighter would be nice, making them easier to move around when needed.Are desks collapsing due to the current iMac weight?
Can you get more iMacs on your desk if the shave another few mm off the thickness?
You you sit side on and think, if only the iMac was a bit thinner?
Do you have trouble positioning the iMac on your desk due to it's thickness
Hey Tim, just wondering how thin is thin enough? How lite is lite enough? I buy Apple products because they are of the highest quality on the market. However, as I have noted with the iPhone 5, it is so light it feels cheeply made. It feels like its so fragile that it will crack easily. With the quality issues it has, perhaps it is cheeply made.
Hey Tim, Apple products are the best available. They have presence. Please don't follow the path the other guys have chosen. Lite, thin, plastic and glue? That's the other guys, not Apple.
But why the hell would they make them more expensive???
thinner body or not, the iMac suffers 2 majors issues that need to be solved:
- fan noise / heat extraction
- "dust" under screen panel after a few months/years of use
so i hope that this is not simply a new aesthetic redesign but also a functional redesign
Boy Apple followers can't seem to make up their mind...
"What? It looks like the last generation!"
- vs -
"What? They're changing the design for no reason"
Leo