I do agree the constant rules changes drives up the cost, especially the aero change rules because F1 is so aero-dependent that the teams then are forced to spend a mint clawing back what the FIA takes away.
However, one advantage of the more strict engine and transmission rules is that the cars are far more reliable now. Montreal this year was an aberration in terms of retirements, when a decade ago it would have been the norm. Even at "power" tracks like Monza and Spa we have the majority of car finishing where in the not-too-distant past they would cull the field like the Grim Reaper on a bender.
And I don't believe unlimited tires would make much of a difference as the pit stop deltas pretty much negate the advantage of more than two stops. Schumacher's win in France with four stops was helped more by the fact that the pit lane at Magny-Cours was so short than the fresh tires and light weights (from being able to run low fuel loads thanks to refueling).
However, one advantage of the more strict engine and transmission rules is that the cars are far more reliable now. Montreal this year was an aberration in terms of retirements, when a decade ago it would have been the norm. Even at "power" tracks like Monza and Spa we have the majority of car finishing where in the not-too-distant past they would cull the field like the Grim Reaper on a bender.
And I don't believe unlimited tires would make much of a difference as the pit stop deltas pretty much negate the advantage of more than two stops. Schumacher's win in France with four stops was helped more by the fact that the pit lane at Magny-Cours was so short than the fresh tires and light weights (from being able to run low fuel loads thanks to refueling).