I hope they don't pull the 'better camera in bigger phone' trick. I just want Apple to stop limiting features exclusively to ‘Plus’ models just because they’re larger.
So like every smartphone on the market these days.I predict a better camera. And faster processor.
It’s gotten a lot easier thanks to constraints and size classes.4.0”/4.7”/5.5”/5.8”/6.1”/6.5” - that’s a lot of display sizes to render for a developer.
That’s physics. The better cameras so far have taken up more volume, and the bigger models have more volume.I hope they don't pull the 'better camera in bigger phone' trick. I just want Apple to stop limiting features exclusively to ‘Plus’ models just because they’re larger.
They do it for the upsell. I miss the days of only needing to think about screen size and storage, though I suppose that never really was the case with Macs.I hope they don't pull the 'better camera in bigger phone' trick. I just want Apple to stop limiting features exclusively to ‘Plus’ models just because they’re larger.
I have found it difficult to adjust to the smaller width of the screen. Makes it harder to read kindle books and such (though I’m okay with t for other uses).I’ve always been a + user but after using the X since launch I’m really enjoying the size a lot more.
Let’s just be happy that we at least have this guy to give us juicy information on these upcoming iPhones. This year so far has been extremely dry with leaks.Enough of these wishy washy rumors. We really need Ming-Chi Kuo back.
Random guesses. Throw as many as you like at the wall and hope some stick.
Are you sure that's not an artifact of the EU's insane tax laws? How about petitioning local governments to lower taxes?
my gf said the same thing when she saw itSo excited for the XL version!!
I don't know about the EU, but it's pretty simple in Australia. 10% flat GST.
64GB iPhone X costs AU$1579, or US$1187.50.
That's still close to 10% more than it should, on top of our 10% GST. I don't know how US pricing works, but if that US$1000 list price includes any federal or state taxes, then that's even worse.
Altering Face ID to work horizontally via software updates is VERY unexpected.None of this seems very unexpected.
It's all about the pricing. Apple need to stop charging European's more money than US costumers. In most places the basic iPhone X starts at almost $1400 dollars. That's ridiculous.
I don't know about the EU, but it's pretty simple in Australia. 10% flat GST.
64GB iPhone X costs AU$1579, or US$1187.50.
That's still close to 10% more than it should, on top of our 10% GST. I don't know how US pricing works, but if that US$1000 list price includes any federal or state taxes, then that's even worse.
Altering Face ID to work horizontally via software updates is VERY unexpected.
Taxes only account for a fraction of the differential. In the UK, we've got 20% sales tax (VAT), but the UK prices are about 40% higher than the before-tax prices in the US after accounting for the exchange rate. The problem is that Apple always sets its exchange rate in Europe very conservatively. That 20% differential now means that if you're buying a combination of Apple products, it's cheaper to fly from say London to New York (you can get return flights for less than $400) and hop on a coach to Delaware.Are you sure that's not an artifact of the EU's insane tax laws? How about petitioning local governments to lower taxes?