Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
4.0”/4.7”/5.5”/5.8”/6.1”/6.5” - that’s a lot of display sizes to render for a developer.
It’s gotten a lot easier thanks to constraints and size classes.
[doublepost=1525742676][/doublepost]
I hope they don't pull the 'better camera in bigger phone' trick. I just want Apple to stop limiting features exclusively to ‘Plus’ models just because they’re larger.
That’s physics. The better cameras so far have taken up more volume, and the bigger models have more volume.
 
I hope they don't pull the 'better camera in bigger phone' trick. I just want Apple to stop limiting features exclusively to ‘Plus’ models just because they’re larger.
They do it for the upsell. I miss the days of only needing to think about screen size and storage, though I suppose that never really was the case with Macs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xpxp2002
I’ve always been a + user but after using the X since launch I’m really enjoying the size a lot more.
I have found it difficult to adjust to the smaller width of the screen. Makes it harder to read kindle books and such (though I’m okay with t for other uses).
 
  • Like
Reactions: tooloud10
Enough of these wishy washy rumors. We really need Ming-Chi Kuo back.
Let’s just be happy that we at least have this guy to give us juicy information on these upcoming iPhones. This year so far has been extremely dry with leaks.
 
Random guesses. Throw as many as you like at the wall and hope some stick.

You say that, but as we get closer to launch historical gossip has proven remarkably accurate, if you look at the last 2-3 years anyway.

So much so that when the new phones have eventually launched looking exactly like the preceding renders it’s been a bit ‍<shrug> . . . oh ok . . .
 
I don't know about the EU, but it's pretty simple in Australia. 10% flat GST.

64GB iPhone X costs AU$1579, or US$1187.50.

That's still close to 10% more than it should, on top of our 10% GST. I don't know how US pricing works, but if that US$1000 list price includes any federal or state taxes, then that's even worse.

The $999.99 and $1,149.99 do not include taxes in the US. In Indiana, where I live, it’s 7%. Others fluctuate from like 5%-10%
 
But get real: announced IN September but because of <some part in short supply- just make up any old part: the flaquomaster X7>, it will be in very short supply for up to forever. So wake up at 2:58am to try to be FIRST... or you may never, ever, never-ever, ever, never, never, never get one... nor your children, nor their children. Hurry! Rush! Apple might squeeze 5 or maybe just 10 units out of the factory before the next, next iPhone is announced.

However, by the prime of the holiday buying period, magical innovations in the supply chain yet again will manage to make it possible to get 1+ (or millions) in time for everyone to get one for Christmas. We fall for it every single year. It works every single year. We never seem to learn. See everyone at 2:58am.

;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I could have swore I read (cannot remember where - probably here) back when the iPhone X was released that FaceID could not support horizontal unlocking due to the TrueDepth Camera System hardware. Now this article is implying/saying that iOS 12 will allow the TrueDepth Camera System on the iPhone X to support horizontal unlocking. Don't get me wrong, I would not mind if that was the case at all. Even though I get a new iPhone every year, I still keep my older one as a backup and it would be nice to have horizontal support on the iPhone X.

If software can make the TrueDepth Camera System on the iPhone X work in horizontal mode, I wish they would release a software update for the iPhone X to support it when the new iPad Pro's come out.

Anyone remember reading/hearing anything like that about the TrueDepth Camera System being hardware limited to vertical support only or no?

:apple:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: xpxp2002
It's all about the pricing. Apple need to stop charging European's more money than US costumers. In most places the basic iPhone X starts at almost $1400 dollars. That's ridiculous.

Apple product pricing was modified to reflect currency exchange rate changes about November 2017. Since the high point of USD valuation (December 2017) the Dollar has declined about 10%. The price increases of 2017 were precipitated by a decline in world currencies (against the USD) of about 20%.

The biggest cause of the price differential is European taxes. The EU (including GB) have a Value Added Tax (VAT) of about 20% that the US does not.
 
I've asked Vegas to consider taking Bets on the number of times we see this on the Net, now thru mid-Sept:

"Former KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo has said ..."
 
I don't know about the EU, but it's pretty simple in Australia. 10% flat GST.

64GB iPhone X costs AU$1579, or US$1187.50.

That's still close to 10% more than it should, on top of our 10% GST. I don't know how US pricing works, but if that US$1000 list price includes any federal or state taxes, then that's even worse.

Eliminating the GST lowers the USD price to about $1,079. The US (federal level) does not have a national Value Added Tax. Most of the States add a sales tax that can be as high as 11%.

In Washington, where I live, the out the door price of the Base iPhone X is US$1,086.
 
Are you sure that's not an artifact of the EU's insane tax laws? How about petitioning local governments to lower taxes?
Taxes only account for a fraction of the differential. In the UK, we've got 20% sales tax (VAT), but the UK prices are about 40% higher than the before-tax prices in the US after accounting for the exchange rate. The problem is that Apple always sets its exchange rate in Europe very conservatively. That 20% differential now means that if you're buying a combination of Apple products, it's cheaper to fly from say London to New York (you can get return flights for less than $400) and hop on a coach to Delaware.
 
Forgot to say, I wish Apple would offer a 5" version of the 8+ in mid-Sept, for the same price as the base iPhone 8, $699.

IMO, if they did that, it would be their best-selling iPhone of ALL time !

$699 vs $728 (their most-current ASP), but with significantly higher volume, VS, and this is critically-important Boys & Girls, if Apple sold between 10-15M iPhone X units, at their prices that mean't Apple must have sold lots of older iPhones to reach the $728 number ... it's a much smarter strategy to have the Lion's Share of purchases be current-generation iPhones !

I know the Market Rewarded Apple, but I think they ONLY deserve a C+ for their financial perf.

Apple needs to get iPhones with 3 GB of DRAM + a Hardware Home Button into as many Users as possible, ONLY then will the masses begin to experience what they've been missing.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.