Would LOOOVE an iPad version of Live and Protools !!Hey, can I ask you guys what your favorite video and photo editing apps are? I'm a pretty hardcore user of PC tools for such things (Premiere, Photoshop, Ableton) and I'm considering an iPad Pro as I'd love to be able to do some of that stuff on the go. Could always just get a super beefy laptop, but I'm really intrigued with the possibilities of the iPad and its portability (I've never owned one).
a 10.5" OLED screen would push the iPad Pro price tag far intoterritory. Think about a $1,300+ base price iPad Pro wifi only
They are far from hitting the per core performance limit, they still get significant speed ups with each new release. However that doesn't mean they won't need those cores for future iOS revisions. The next beg revolution will be in their support of AR / AI technologies and features that bring to mind the Knowledge Navigator video. I doubt we will see one big innovation using all this compute power, rather we will gradually see iOS on iPad morph into something far more powerful.I'm actually quite interested how quickly Apple has turned round on core count after years of adhering to two... I suppose they've hit the ceiling to a degree on single-core performance, so they've gone with multi-core to carry them forward until the next big innovation
iTunes movies, home movies and whatever else can be stored there. The sad thing with iPad is if you take them someplace with limited internet, you can't stream to the device reliably. Storing files locally solves this problem. Of course Apple could offer an iPad with 4TB of storage but you know they won''t do that.I know tons of iPad Pro users and it's the first time I hear about someone wanting a SDXC card slot.
one thing they could add would be a mouse mode or a 4 or 5K resolution or a solid state battery, but card slot, what for?
Most applications cannot be optimized in that way. I take it you're not a software developer.If an application is optimized for more cores can use 2 or 2000 cores.
Correct, but the benefit is limited, because most applications cannot be made to use more than four cores or so. For many applications, the practical limit is two cores. This is something the industry will have to face at some point. GPUs do highly parallel computation better than CPUs do, and they probably always will. CPUs going for more cores at lower clock speeds is a bit like a GPU trying to go for fewer cores at higher clock speeds. Simply ridiculous. If CPUs cannot improve their per-core performance, they've reached a plateau.Ryzen has made 6-8 core mainstream and it is getting harder to run cores faster, so the direction now is towards using more cores.
It’s still going to have bezzles for grip, just not thick onesWhere exactly are you supposed to grip that rendered iPad?
I’d actually buy one. Have had one iPad ever and it was far too limited for me to justify its price.It’s time to put macOS onto iPads
I wish the iOS will fully leverage the multi core CPU, since I really can't feel the boost of hardware recently.eight cores will likely NOT produce performance improvements in most real-world scenarios, actually. Most applications cannot take advantage of that many cores.
Where exactly are you supposed to grip that rendered iPad?
Now that I have found good video and photo editing tools, Multi-tasking is better, and I have native file access to iCloud and Drive, I am having little need for my laptop.
Does the notch come as an add-on dongle?
Sure.
More or less answered your question in this post. I actually like this software better than FCPX for quick video edits. It layers in text and other items without making you wait for it to render. Not bad for a mobile app that also works just as well on phones.
a 10.5" OLED screen would push the iPad Pro price tag far intoterritory. Think about a $1,300+ base price iPad Pro wifi only
The current iPad Pro is mega powerful already. Hardly any App tax its processing power at all. So... Why more?
The iPad Pro needs stronger software (and iOS!), not stronger CPU.
Hardware engineers working on stronger CPU are not precluding the software engineers from making stronger software.
The hardware isn’t a bottleneck for any of the iPad’s current functions, but it also can’t be a bottleneck or limit to anything the software folks want to try out.
I apologize if this has already been mentioned in this 8 page thread, but the current ipad pro has a very fast processor
[doublepost=1510799628][/doublepost]
why? oled prices should be coming down as the technology gets mature. A 55" OLED 4K TV can be had for $1599
It’s time to put macOS onto iPads
Common sense didn't say to make the bezel thicker on the phone, so that is pure speculation.You can relax, no need for pills or anything. You would be hugely relieved to know that there may not be a need for a notch. Common sense would say that the bezel may be thick enough to house the sensors.
Certainly not in the "love the notch" camp.Now that is assuming you are on the "I hate the notch" camp.
Common sense didn't say to make the bezel thicker on the phone, so that is pure speculation..
Safari and my Crossword game will load even faster![]()
One potential drawback I see with such slim bezels is that there is going to be constant pressure exerted on the edges of the display when you're holding it.
As long as there's a notch, it's not ready yet.Ok, on what iPhone they were thicker, and thicker then what?
iPhone always had thick bezels, they did not get any thicker. They were there due to technology limitations and Apple unlike some other companies did not rush to do a drastic design changes until it was ready.