Show were he said iCloud is the method going forward as opposed to on-board storage.
Secondly explain why in 2017 the iPhone storage option was doubled in 2017 when were well into the age if iCloud
Third, explain why iPad in 2017 the iPad pro was given the option of 512GB if the "core value" is iCloud
I believe you are mistaking me for an Apple Executive

These seem like questions you should ask of Cook or Schiller, as it was their decision to limit iOS devices physical storage for the longest time to 16GB. Why not incorporate an microSD slot for removable storage.
Straw-man therefore can be ignored
Is this your counter, smh.
The following would need to be known first:
1: is iCloud storage available.
2: is iCloud storage trustworthy
Learn more about iCloud in China (I'm not going to go into debate about that, its a topic for another forum.)
3: what is the cost of 2TB storage in that market
4: how long do users in emerging markets hold on to a premium phone.
Not even everyone here on MR updates every year.
These are questions one must ask from Apple’s Executive Team, unless you believe I am the one who limits the default free iCloud storage to 5GB since inception. Many countries have strict local laws, EU, India, etc. This is not limited to China only and I understand those countries concerns. If the shoes was on the other foot and you are using a another country branded phone and service, I assure you the US government will have all sorts of propaganda and demands to store its citizens data in America. Now if you are talking about Human Rights, this is not the thread for it. There are many cloud storage providers with varying storage plans, features, etc. It is user dependant for what fits their cloud storage requirements. Subjective, some users hold on to their phones for within 5 years and hand it down to family/relatives/friends. Granted not everyone on MR updates phones every year, however a significant vocal members do compared to the general public. My point is that even if you purchase a 512GB or even a 1TB physical storage phone, by the time a regular user fills that up the battery would require to be replaced, the phone might have sustained some damage, camera tech improved, screen/display quality and tech improved, etc. On average users purchase a phone through their carrier on a 24 month term. It is safe to say that most users will have a challenging time to use 512GB let along 1TB of physical storage. With streaming services such as Apple Music, Spotify, Netflix, etc there is very little requirement for most to have that amount of storage. Unless the cell/WiFi infrastructure in the location you reside is not up to par, hence 5G development and deployment. Even Google is heavily invested in cloud storage.
Sorry, don't use social media.
No FB, Twitter, Snapchat or Instagram.
Stop making assumptions on why or how people use their devices.
Another assumption.
You are on a public forum right, I believe your concept of social media is skewed.
Kool-aid? You have no idea how that expression should be used.
The ones who get intoxicated from it, never see it as such. However go ahead enlighten me with your wisdom.
Another assumption based on your own imagination.
You can't prove most what people never use, sound like you just have sour grapes.
Seems you are assuming that I have sour grapes. The average user does not tune into WWDC or Apple hardware releases, let alone know what new features the updated iOS has to offer. I know this from a many, ranging a spectrum of age groups. Why would you think I am bitter? Unless you are reflecting on this forum what is your reality.
Source:
https://www.cultofmac.com/325819/ph...oks-with-one-usb-port-design-vs-battery-life/
Oops.
Looks like Phil has egg on his face 'cause the top tier storage capacities have doubled in 2017.
Why downplay Schiller? He is an Apple Executive, he is the one who is bet informed to answer your prior questions and concerns.
Why are you asking me to explain RAM? I never mentioned or alludede to anything about RAM.
Guess all you want, it's what you've been doing all along. Nothing new.
Just as Apple limited RAM for many generations, as their did with ROM. Figure it out, I don’t need to hold your hand on everything, live by your words and think outside the box. Smh.
And you are confusing your reality as a universal reality.
Therefore "I reject your reality and substitute my own" (which works for me).
I am confusing nothing, I am quoting what was mentioned by an Apple Executive on their decisions to limit physical storage for generations. If you do not choose to accept facts with evidence, that is your choice. However don’t bury your head in the ground and call other out.

[doublepost=1534345168][/doublepost]
TBH 64 gig is way to much for me. I just can't see the sense of paying through the nose for all this storage on a device.
If I omit the system storage, I only use 6-8GB of physical storage or less it varies. However we are in the same boat, I wonder how much of the cost cold be saved if Apple offered a 32GB physical storage with the option of microSD expansion. It would provide the user the option to scale the amount of storage required and transferring files, or reviewing footage from a digital camera, drone would be super quick and easy. Instead we have multiple SKU’s. It would be simpler to just offer 32GB base storage with the option for the user to use microSD cards for upto 1TB, however I suspect if Apple went that route people will hold on to their phones for 5 years if not longer.