Source?The sad part is, their keyboards used to be great - rock solid, reliable, a joy to type on. They sacrificed an existing fantastic design, and the only thing they seem to have gained is the ability to make the machine a few millimeters thinner, which nobody outside of Apple is asking for.
[doublepost=1531443163][/doublepost]They're facing several class action suits over the previous design. If they say "this one breaks less", not only does it make them look bad in general, the attorneys in the class action suits will point to the relevant interviews, press release, and videos, and say, "Your Honor, we'd like to submit these as exhibit A, B, and C."
Thus, we won't really know if it's better until several thousand of them have been in customer hands for several months.
[doublepost=1531448617][/doublepost]
Gruber didn’t say there was a design flaw. He’s saying if there was one it would be in Apple’s interest to not admit it and just fix it. That’s what I’m agreeing with. One, we don’t know if the keyboard issue was a design flaw with the butterfly mechanism. If Gruber’s rumor is true the issue was with a metal alloy in one of the parts used. That’s something Apple could fix without telling anyone. Two, even if there was a design flaw Apple wouldn’t admit it for obvious reasons. At the same time it seems highly unlikely they would release brand new models without fixing the issue. I get that people still have concerns about the keyboard but perhaps they should wait for reviews before assuming the problem hasn’t been fixed.No duh it’s not in their interest to sell faulty hardware. Has anyone actually said that it was or is that just your preferred straw man? Do you think Ford intentionally designed Pinto gas tanks to explode when rear-ended? Obviously not, it was just a design flaw, same as the MBP keyboards. I’m glad you said John Gruber has it right though, because it actually hits many of the same notes I did...