Sea Stripes from the iPhone SE should have won IMO. That photo is beautiful.
Been an amateur photographer for over 20 years don't see what's so special about these photos....lol
I think Apple is letting their emotions decide what constitutes a good photo.
as a photographer my self them shots are really nothing special
What the **** is with everyone in this ****ing thread? Can’t you all just enjoy some nice pictures? It makes no ****ing difference how much of a photographer you are, I don’t see your pictures in the awards.
And these are exceptional pictures. What is the job of a picture? To capture a moment, to tell a story and to above all evoke an emotional response. For the judges at Apple these pictures hit those points!
y’all need to just chill man and learn from the dude, Jeff bridges. Take it easy man.
I'm sure it won because it's diverse and cultural.
as a photographer my self them shots are really nothing special
I was contacted by Apple about this photo tagged #ShotOniPhone back in 2014 with an iPhone 5 in Barcelona. They asked for the original file to confirm that it was shot on iPhone and presumably to get the full resolution. I don't know if it was ever published but I assume they would have let me know.
View attachment 849838
y’all need to just chill man and learn from the dude, Jeff bridges. Take it easy man.
there are two types of "photographer". artistic and gear-tistic.
as a photographer my self them shots are really nothing special
as a photographer my self them shots are really nothing special
Not sure why everyone is attacking this guy and another for their opinions? I would agree, I don't think that they're that special. Well accept for the last photo. I actually like that one. It's not hating or dissing, just fact. I started doing photography about 2 years ago, and I'm not the best shooter out there, but the first two photos just didn't really impress me.as a photographer my self them shots are really nothing special
as a photographer my self them shots are really nothing special
Not sure why everyone is attacking this guy and another for their opinions? I would agree, I don't think that they're that special. Well accept for the last photo. I actually like that one. It's not hating or dissing, just fact. I started doing photography about 2 years ago, and I'm not the best shooter out there, but the first two photos just didn't really impress me.
I know most here wont agree, but I feel like this pic I took on my old Moto X Pure could rank higher than the first two. View attachment 849858
Not sure why everyone is attacking this guy and another for their opinions? I would agree, I don't think that they're that special. Well accept for the last photo. I actually like that one. It's not hating or dissing, just fact. I started doing photography about 2 years ago, and I'm not the best shooter out there, but the first two photos just didn't really impress me.
I know most here wont agree, but I feel like this pic I took on my old Moto X Pure could rank higher than the first two. View attachment 849858
Okay "that guy." The first picture has too much exposure. It actually has the color washed out and also crushed detail in the image. Also isn't cropped well, because it has to much being shown other than the subjects the photographer wants you to see. Actually I see no "rule of thirds" or any main compositions actually being used.^I'm sorry but I'm going to be that guy - but all the photos that won are miles ahead of this photo sample you gave. Look, I think I've seen many images I personally enjoy more than some of these too (every day in my Instafeed) but they're perfectly fine winners for this competition. They all have an interesting focal point or visual juxtaposition or tell some kind of story or paint some kind of atmosphere/tone. If nothing else, the colour is beautiful on all the photos.
Where is any of that in the photo that you posted? Can you justify why you think your photo is better? It's a graffitied up alley with a car going by. Where's the focal point? What's so interesting or arresting about your image? It's a perfectly okay photo for anyone to have in terms of taking snaps on travels or around a city for your our own memories, but I don't even see an interesting composition/point of view of the alley or the graffiti in this photo or a story or a tone. The best I could come up with is that you're trying to juxtapose the contrast between the dingy alley and what's beyond but if that's the case, the background is simply not important enough visually to get that across.
I don't pretend to be anything but a complete amateur photographer with no background in it (other than film school) either but even I think I have a few photos with graffiti that are at least more interesting visually than the one you posted.
I‘d be interested in the reasoning behind the theory that superior qualification is needed to be able to judge someone else‘s achievements.For future reference: when dissing someone, you want to demonstrate your superior qualifications to make the assertions you do. Maybe you could demonstrate the awards that you have received, or the galleries where you have pictures on display, that would work!
Matter of taste, but like I explained to other guy. I went for the exposure of background being bright, it's not as much exposure as the winning picture. Also 20 random photographers liked the photo. The car just happened to pass, the shot was to show the alley. Also this was shot on a Moto X Pure phone, and you wouldn't know if I didn't tell you. LolWhy?
This shot is ill-composed and you have the background highlights completely blown out. The car in the background makes no sense and you only captured 80% of the care as your timing careless.