TBH, Studio display is expensive since it's just another 5K display and had been used a while ago. They didnt even show its contrast ratio. What makes it so special to sell it at $1500 instead of $1000?
Yeah. And the Thunderbolt Display actually was a pretty good deal compared to previous Apple displays. I remember drooling over the 2004 30” Cinema Display, which launched at $3,299. Even the 23” display was $2k. Nevermind what 2004 money would be worth today.Metal chasis, A13 chip, 12MP camera, likely impressive speakers, and Apple polish with associated tax.
The display is indeed expensive, but the only competition is the LG 5K which is $1,299 I believe. Compared to that display, this one is much nicer. It's cheaper than I thought, but still more than it probably should be, but look at Apple's 14" laptop staring at $1,999?
If you consider that the Thunderbolt Display sold for $999 about 10 years, then $1,699 today isn't that unexpected.
Pricing & Availability
The 20-inch Apple Cinema Display and 23-inch Apple Cinema HD Display will be available in July, and the 30-inch Apple Cinema HD Display will be available in August, through the Apple Store® (www.apple.com), at Apple’s retail stores and Apple Authorized Resellers for a suggested retail price of $1,299 (US), $1,999 (US) and $3,299 (US), respectively.
![]()
Apple Unveils 30” Cinema HD Flat Display
www.apple.com
They came down from the stratosphere in price a couple of years later.Yeah. And the Thunderbolt Display actually was a pretty good deal compared to previous Apple displays. I remember drooling over the 2004 30” Cinema Display, which launched at $3,299. Even the 23” display was $2k. Nevermind what 2004 money would be worth today.
That's the same thing some people were saying about the Studio display that was just a rumor at the time and is for sale in the Apple store todayIt could release any time, it could not release.....
This is hardly information.
Ah, can you imagine prices coming down on a product like that today? Different times huh? I’m with you. I would love to see a sub $3000 32” 6k “Studio Display Max” or something like that.They came down from the stratosphere in price a couple of years later.
I bought my 30" Cinema HD Display in 2006 for $2,249. I'm still using it (with my Mid 2010 Mac Pro) as I type this. Greatest monitor ever. When people say "Why would anyone buy a large monitor" I question their sanity. I'd give anything to be able to afford the Pro HDR 6K. I wish this Studio Display model had a larger big brother.
The price dropped even more shortly after I bought it! ? It went down to $1,999 by 2007 ...Ah, can you imagine prices coming down on a product like that today? Different times huh? I’m with you. I would love to see a sub $3000 32” 6k “Studio Display Max” or something like that.
In the keynote Apple said there's only one more M1 Mac coming, the Mac Pro.The most frustrating is for those waiting an 27" iMac as the quiet removal gives no hint as to whether a replacement is coming. The Studio display does appear to just be the iMac 5K display in a new housing ( not sure if that's why they've removed the iMac from the website as they're diverting production to the Studio Display), but costing more than the 27" iMac!
Yes technically it‘s possible, but that’s not really a caveat if it affects a total of nobody. For all intents and purposes you can’t notice it at all.
Appart the front camera and speakers, and considering LG has height adjustment built in, I’m having a hard time to justify 2000€ for this Studio Display.So you demand that it should cost the same as the inferior LG Ultrafine 5k?
HDMI 2.1 doesn't have enough bandwidth for 5K 120Hz
I completely agree. If you use headphones while working and you don‘t need a webcam there‘s little to justify the hefty price premium over the LG function-wise.Appart the front camera and speakers, and considering LG has height adjustment built in, I’m having a hard time to justify 2000€ for this Studio Display.
I need a screen to look at, not to hear from or to be seen from…?
Adjust that $999 price for inflation and I'm sure you will get pretty close to the price of the Studio Display....If you consider that the Thunderbolt Display sold for $999 about 10 years, then $1,699 today isn't that unexpected.
I completely agree. If you use headphones while working and you don‘t need a webcam there‘s little to justify the hefty price premium over the LG function-wise.
It‘s been 6 years and all that Apple really could improve over the LG was the speakers and the cam. Oh and 100 nits - great.
Yes - but the gap between rumour and shipping product can be very long. There have been intermittent rumours about a replacement for the Apple Thunderbolt Display since it was discontinued in 2016, and they started to become a bit more concrete more than a year before the Studio Display was announced.That's the same thing some people were saying about the Studio display that was just a rumor at the time and is for sale in the Apple store today
Marketing 101 man.So regular < studio < pro? I'm not sure what pro means anymore because of iPad Pro and iPhone Pro. Those are toys compared to Mac Pro