Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So...how did that qualify as a "big deal" in any way? I love :apple: and what they do for the technology industry but how can they possibly afford to lead the media on like this? This was not only not revolutionary it barely warranted an under the radar release let alone a big scale event. Computer technology is drastically lagging!!


edit: Not to mention no copy/paste, no facebook 2.0, no turn by turn gps, no picture messaging.... this is ridiculous.

The "Big Deal" was that Jobs was still alive. Obviously.:rolleyes:
 
Agreed! WTF JOBBS!

What cares about nike+ in a iTouch? Strap that brick around your arm and run? Where is the GPS? Mic? Camera?

I am SO SO DISAPPOINTED!

Sigh...

I would much rather have GPS then some dumb nike thing no one is going to use. At least they have an adapter for it! There is no GPS ADAPTER :mad:!!!!

URG! I would much rather pay $299 for the same iPod touch if they just put GPS in it! WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF

when i do that dum where am i thing it says im somewere in southern carolina. I LIVE IN COLORADO ARTARD! Come on jobbs u know wut we want. give us GPS! in everything! i want gps in my gawd dam shuffle :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:
 
32GB only FTL. Seriously. Nothing fanboi about this. I want a touch. I really do. However I treat my iPod as a jukebox for my music. And when I have friends in the car with varying tastes having my entire collection with me comes in handy. Then there is cross country trips...if I decide I want to listen to a specific artists along the way no need to break out my laptop to get to it. Its all on one device. this was the original intention of the iPod and the literal reason why Jobs didn't want to go into the 512MB PMP area. And yet now we have the touch that is sacrificing this ability for having it a bit thinner. Screw battery life. Add 1Gb of cache (Doesn't even need to be high speed either.) on that thing and you will almost never spin up a drive and only spin it up when loading movies. Then when the system goes to sleep for say more then an hour flush half the cache and shut 512MB down to conserve power.
but nooooo. we have Mr Jobs who seems to have a thin fetish. gah! :(
 
So, outside of physical volume buttons and a more tapered design, it seems that the touch is largely the same as before. I have a 32 GB first gen and I'm in no hurry to upgrade.
 
So, outside of physical volume buttons and a more tapered design, it seems that the touch is largely the same as before. I have a 32 GB first gen and I'm in no hurry to upgrade.

As it always is. Those with the 80GB classic aren't missing much, maybe the Nano buyers are since they got a pretty big up update, but nothing to really run to the stores for.

Same thing with the iPhone 3G and anytime there's a new Mac laptop or desktop.
 
So disappointed the iPods Touch 1st gen can't have Nike+ :( that was one of the major app i was waiting for.. :(

edit i would also have preferred more battery life for something less thiner. anyways.
 
Those of us who are being negative are simply getting a little fed up with the Mac getting second billing on everything.

* Apple hasn't held a special event for Macs in god-knows-how-long.

* The iMac updates in the last year have left many customers disappointed and many customers unhappy with their lack of display options.

* Updates and spec bumps across the line have slowed considerably from the old days. Apple used to do spec bumps and/or price drops every 4-6 months. It's like they don't really care enough to bother now.

* Displays haven't seen a significant update in ages.

* Mac Mini is long past being a joke. It should have been updated months ago.

* Recent Mac-related events have seen the Mac marginalized in the keynotes. I can handle that from time-to-time, but at WWDC? That's ridiculous.

* And as for the comment that "It was a music event, what did you expect"... you'll need to explain why the iPhone made the billing, but the Mac didn't. They both interact with iTunes and both play music. And how about explaining why the iPhone and iPod/iTunes merit special events, but the Mac never does anymore.

* Significant updates to the Mac line-up, software and OS have been delayed due reportedly to Apple focusing its time and energies on iPhone and iPod.

It's not that some of us are being overly negative. We're just getting a little sick of Apple treating their computer customers like second class citizens. Bravo, we all love the iPhone and the iPod. How about putting the spotlight on the Mac from time-to-time? And no, showing off the expensive, high-end Macbook Air that appeals to a very small segment of Mac users doesn't cut it.

The iPhone made an appearance because it one point Steve himself said it was the best iPod ever. Why don't people seem to grasp the phone is an Ipod?
 
The new touch is actually thicker than previous model. Look it up. The battery in new model is rated at 36hr music and 6hr video. Previous version was 22hr music and 5hr video.

The battery life is substantially better.
 
Why is everyone complaining that there's no camera, or no GPS, or no whatever? Apple will not add a camera or GPS to the iPod Touch; they don't want it to get too close to the iPhone in features. The iPod Touch isn't meant to do all the things the iPhone does like camera and GPS, it's supposed to be an iPod and a apps and games device. Why would you need GPS anyway? You would have to be connected to WiFi to get directions, and if you're using GPS to go somewhere, you aren't likely to find WiFi hotspots everywhere.
 
Why is everyone complaining that there's no camera, or no GPS, or no whatever? Apple will not add a camera or GPS to the iPod Touch; they don't want it to get too close to the iPhone in features. The iPod Touch isn't meant to do all the things the iPhone does like camera and GPS, it's supposed to be an iPod and a apps and games device. Why would you need GPS anyway? You would have to be connected to WiFi to get directions, and if you're using GPS to go somewhere, you aren't likely to find WiFi hotspots everywhere.

and let's not forget that awesome feature that no touch should be plagued with - ATT!!:p
 
£169 for the 8GB sounds pretty decent...
Or maybe that's when I compare it to the 32GB at £279. Over £50 more than America is paying, unless I am mistaken.
 
Why is everyone complaining that there's no camera, or no GPS, or no whatever? Apple will not add a camera or GPS to the iPod Touch; they don't want it to get too close to the iPhone in features. The iPod Touch isn't meant to do all the things the iPhone does like camera and GPS, it's supposed to be an iPod and a apps and games device. Why would you need GPS anyway? You would have to be connected to WiFi to get directions, and if you're using GPS to go somewhere, you aren't likely to find WiFi hotspots everywhere.

ARRRRRRRRGGGHHHH!! One does not need to be connected to anything for GPS (other than the satellite signal). How the Hell do you people think stand-alone GPS units (like the after-market Tomtom and Garmin) work :confused:

OK, feelin' better now.
 
ARRRRRRRRGGGHHHH!! One does not need to be connected to anything for GPS (other than the satellite signal). How the Hell do you people think stand-alone GPS units (like the after-market Tomtom and Garmin) work :confused:

OK, feelin' better now.
He's talking about GPS software that works over Wifi, not hardware.

Also, I can't understand some of the expectations people had.
 
I sure like it.

The only thing that I would change is the ****ing scratchy back. Damn them.

Just ordered a 32gb. :D
 
ARRRRRRRRGGGHHHH!! One does not need to be connected to anything for GPS (other than the satellite signal). How the Hell do you people think stand-alone GPS units (like the after-market Tomtom and Garmin) work :confused:

OK, feelin' better now.

There is no way to store maps on any of these devices yet, so what are you going to do with a set of GPS co-ords?

The only thing I'm pissed about is the built-in speaker, yet another device that kids/teens can use to annoy me when they think everyone around them wants to hear their poor taste in music.
 
He's talking about GPS software that works over Wifi, not hardware.

That he may be, but it's not mentioned anywhere in his post. It seems to me that he's assuming (as many people here do) that GPS requires a cell signal.

Also, I can't understand some of the expectations people had.

Amen to that! I was hoping for GPS, but not expecting it. I *really* wanted a speaker so I could share videos without people with playing "pass the 'phones". Add the upgraded battery and I'm ready to buy as soon as stock hits the store :D
 
There is no way to store maps on any of these devices yet, so what are you going to do with a set of GPS co-ords?

Why not? I can currently store anything on my iPod Touch (which I'm returning to the store now that the new ones are out). Of course, it's jailbroken--but it makes the point that not being able to store maps is simply an Apple-induced limitation which is easily remedied with a firmware update. All Apple would have to do is:

1) put the GPS receiver in the iPod Touch
2) add a "Maps" directory to the "Media" directory (just like I added a "ROMs" directory to make my NES emulator work)
3) sell maps on iTS
4) write the code--a simple modification--to take advantage of it all
 
Why is everyone complaining that there's no camera, or no GPS, or no whatever? Apple will not add a camera or GPS to the iPod Touch; they don't want it to get too close to the iPhone in features. The iPod Touch isn't meant to do all the things the iPhone does like camera and GPS, it's supposed to be an iPod and a apps and games device. Why would you need GPS anyway? You would have to be connected to WiFi to get directions, and if you're using GPS to go somewhere, you aren't likely to find WiFi hotspots everywhere.

It's supposed to be an ipod (?), apps (mostly gimmicks, mostly 3rd party, mostly costly) and a games device (whatever the keynote said, urrrrr)?
It's a good thing for us that it's purposely limited so it doesn't effect the sales of their other products?

It's a shame most people don't know that there's 4 year old pdas, wrapped in nice black magnesium cases with discrete graphics that can do play mp3s with artwork, run all sorts of 3rd party apps and 3d games and also do divx/xvid/dvds/h264, 'full' web browsing, gps, voip, bluetooth, ad2p, sd/cf expansion, removable batteries, office apps, 4.7" sony(eww) screens with twice the res of the itouch etcetcetcetc. Maybe they'd question the prices/features/limitations of some of these 'revolutionary' products a little more and we'd all end up happier. There is competition, even if it's a relatively(massively) small, dying and unadvertised market.

It's a shame there isn't even more complaining and whining about countless issues, much more fun and more productive(?!) than blindly assuming everything they're doing with this line is good. The responses can be a great giggle too.

It's a shame there's no potential in the current touch for apples take on road navigation software. With all the storage and their distribution, it would be pretty easy for them to add all sorts of road maps, air/sea charts, OS(uk), compasses, speedo/g/velocity meters etcetc - I'd love to see what they could do, apps like tomtom/igo etc are brilliant and shoddy at the same time.

It's a shame that half the itouch posts seem to be crying out for a gps receiver (I'd even buy into it, trusting the software would come later) while the other half can't tell the difference between gps and a dot on google maps (a mobile app that was about way before the iphone existed). Funnily enough I know that wifi doesn't work in the middle of nowhere - the only interest I have in random hotspots while driving is the potential for 100000s of itouch/phone/whatever users to be telling the internet average speeds/traffic jams etc.

It's a shame the one feature I wanted for an excuse to buy an ipod wasn't included. I didn't get what I wanted, which means that the product (line) sucks, obviously.

enough random offtopicish babble from me
 
ARRRRRRRRGGGHHHH!! One does not need to be connected to anything for GPS (other than the satellite signal). How the Hell do you people think stand-alone GPS units (like the after-market Tomtom and Garmin) work :confused:

OK, feelin' better now.

Huh. Didn't know that. I thought that the standalone GPS devices used cell signals. No need to get all angry.
 
I am kinda dissapointed. I had hoped for more in terms of memory at least. iPod touch with 64g for $399 would have gotten me of the bench.
I am going to save my $400 and see what happens with an ultra portable this fall.
 
Huh. Didn't know that. I thought that the standalone GPS devices used cell signals. No need to get all angry.

The need is in the, uh, mind of the, uh, angered party ;)

For the past many weeks we ("we" being people who either want GPS in the iPod Touch and/or who understand how it works) have been seeing this exact same comment every other post. I understand that people don't always read an entire thread, but the repetition is monotonous :mad:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.