Plus a number of other features.
The word 'better' is subjective - neither is 'better' as such, however the UI on the iPhone is more user friendly and the features set on the N95 more extensive. As for software platform, well that's a silly thing to say - S60v3 is tested, works and has thousands of apps. You can't say that about mobile OSX yet.
You think? I think price, carrier lock, distribtuion and other factors will determine the iPhone's popularity. To assume that it will increase because apps are added which already exist under other OS is a bit naive.
No it won't because Symbian isn't tied to one manufacturer. Mobile OSX will probably achieve the same minor niche that full scale OSX does for exactly the same reasons.
Again wrong. Nokia make a number of devices including over twenty smartphones catering to all segments - i.e. those who want a touchpad, those who want a keyboard, those who want QWERTY with different feature sets and pricing options. The iPhone is just for one user segment at present.
I think you're underestimating Nokia and SE here.
You do realise that Symbian and WM continue to evolve, right? Your assumptions are based on them remaining static which again is naive.
You misunderstand. In the markets in which Nokia has significant presence it has already killed the iPhone. Sales volumes will tell you that - the iPhone's SDK is a case of jam tomorrow, S60v3 is here today.
I'm sorry, but it's you who doesn't get it because you're applying the requirements of one market segment to the entire market. You're also making spurious assumptions that the SDk will offer somethign that isn't already available which it actually won't.
And there is both Apple's strength and weakness: linked hardware and software. Great for conformity, woeful for versatility and choice.
Apple will remain a niche player in the phone market unless they release a wide range of models with differing features, carrier choice and acceptable pricing.
Who is that clown?