Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.


Apple's main chip supplier TSMC will kick off mass production of 3nm chips this week, with Apple being the primary customer of the new process, which could first be used in upcoming M2 Pro chips expected to power updated MacBook Pro and Mac mini models.

3nm-apple-silicon-feature.jpg

According to the new report by DigiTimes, TSMC will start mass production of its next-generation 3nm chip process on Thursday, December 29, in line with reports from earlier in the year that said 3nm mass production would begin later in 2022. From the report:
Apple currently uses TSMC's 4nm process in the A16 Bionic chip in the iPhone 14 Pro series but could jump to 3nm as soon as early next year. A report in August claimed the upcoming M2 Pro chips would be the first to be based on the 3nm process. The M2 Pro chip is expected to debut first in updated 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pros early next year and possibly updated Mac Studio and Mac mini models.

Later in 2023, according to another report, the third generation of Apple silicon, the M3 chip, and the A17 Bionic for the iPhone 15, will be based on TSMC's enhanced 3nm process, which has yet to be made available. According to the DigiTimes report today, citing industry sources, production of 3nm process chips is "unlikely to ramp up" until production of the enhanced version gets underway.

Article Link: 3nm Chips From Apple Supplier TSMC to Enter Mass Production This Week
Oh yes bring it on! When’s the earliest we could see a revised MBP with the 3nm M2Pro??
 
Well it sucks to be an iPhone 14 Pro owner. USB-C and 3nm for the iPhone 15 Pro. 👌
What are you talking about? With all of the lightning cables I've accumulated over the years — I don't want usb-c))) Oh, and btw iPhone 15 won't be out for a while, so being a 14 Pro owner isn't really that bad at all. Oh, and people upgrade ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chidoro
I feel like all the people here holding their breath for 3nm chips, expecting them to be some sort of revelation/performance breakthrough, are just setting themselves up to be disappointed.
I think you are right. I mean all the benchmark videos will blow you away, but when you start doing whatever you do with your computer, doubt you'll notice much of a difference. Like adding 32GB of ram, few people will really benefit from that. imho, of course..
 
  • Like
Reactions: uczcret
- AMD and Intel have reached 2200 in Geekbench single-core (while Apple’s newest chip just hit 1880).
-Qualcomm has reached 1550 in single-core and Snapdragon Gen 2 has surpassed the A16 in graphics by a big margin
- Apple lost many of their best chip designers

Tell me again why we should see Apple as a leader?
The fall of Apple
(The Fall of Apple Under Tim Apple)

I’m not against apple or favoring android/windows, but I can see a slight decline of Apple in the recent years: Lack of organization in the iPad lineup, Macs being way too expensive and don’t offer consumer priced displays (also M1 Ultra still can’t defeat Nvidia 3090), too much variation and lack of many important features that are already on android(fast charging, better heat management, etc) . The os are falling apart too (universal control failed to work yesterday, IOS starts to get buggy and slow, stage manager on iPad don’t make much sense…...

And now A16 is somehow behind snapdragon Gen2
I remembered just last year (2021) Apple is still ahead of many stuff and 2022 is a mess
 
Last edited:
When do I get my holographic tactile interface? 3nm is just insane. Dang that is small.
 
Tell me again why we should see Apple as a leader?
Because Intel is begging the German government for yet more subsidies to build a "cutting-edge" 10 nm fab, which will become operational between 2025 and 2027. With plans like these, Intel will likely never become competitive on performance per watt. Just like Microsoft they've engineered themselves into a desktop PC corner of the overall computing market and are already irrelevant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
The new fab plant that is being built in the US will always be years behind. It's nice that they will build a plant here in the US. Many don't understand how far behind it will always be.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NetMage
If the M2Pro/M2Max is releasing in March 2023, it can not be 3nm, am I right?
Correct, the processors in these updated Macbook Pro have already been in production so they will not be on the 3nm process. Apple would never risk a product release on a brand new fab start, the 3nm will most likely be used for the A17 processor and then the M3 lineup.
 
If 3nm M2Pro chips are beginning to ramp up production as soon as this week, there's no reason an announcement couldn't come in the spring.
Wrong, there is no way in the world the spring Mac's will be based upon the 3nm process that is just entering production. There is too much work that is needed to prove in the new production line to ever allow it to be used in such a high volume high profile product that will be offered in a few months - it takes 8+ weeks to complete a wafer run.

There could be a multitude of issues with chips on a new line; power consumption, data integrity, fab process issues, backside issues, etc. so no way would Apple place a bet that this will go without a hitch and even of it did go well at TSMC, Apple would need to conduct it's own quality and reliability studies on the new process line.
 
According to the new report by DigiTimes, TSMC will start mass production of its next-generation 3nm chip process on Thursday, December 29, in line with reports from earlier in the year that said 3nm mass production would begin later in 2022. From the report:
We’ll see if this is just more fiction once again than fact. Speculation about an upcoming meeting as beginning of commercial production, instead of something else.

Related

It is unusual for TSMC to hold a ceremony to mark the beginning of commercial production of a new technology. Market analysts speculate that the company is holding the ceremony to publicize its intention to keep using Taiwan as a hub for research, development and production, despite its overseas investments.

Suspicion has risen that TSMC could relocate its production and R&D efforts to the United States after the chipmaker said at a first tool-in ceremony for a 12-inch wafer plant in the U.S. state of Arizona on Dec. 6 that it would increase its planned US$12 billion investment in Arizona to US$40 billion to build not only a 4-nanometer fab scheduled to begin production in 2024 but also a 3nm fab scheduled to begin operations in 2026.

Those concerns have intensified since TSMC sent a large group of engineers from Taiwan to support the Arizona plant, prompting many investors to fear that the chipmaker's base in Taiwan could lose its advantage by escalating competition on the global market through its move overseas
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Reactions: amartinez1660
Lets goooo

If M2 Pro upwards are indeed on 3nm, and they get the new GPU that was meant for A16 with ray tracing but used too much power for the iPhone, this would be a much bigger update than M2
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
The first batch of 3nm will probably be reserved for the A17 and the AR/VR headset. Followed by the M3 in late 2023.

I really can’t see 3nm coming to the M2 Pro/ Max. No reliable sources have talked about it. This 3nm rumor was started by YouTubers. At best, the M2 Pro / Max may move up to 4nm like the A16.
 
From what I’ve read on the subject Apple has two benefits to choose from with the 3nm process. They can keep the speed the same and achieve a 30% reduction in power requirements, meaning much longer battery life and thinner cases, OR they can choose a 15% increase in speed with the same power requirements.

So which would you choose?
It depends on the product. For the iPhone 15 I’d prefer the efficiency. For the MacBook Pro probably the additional speed.
 
The fall of Apple
(The Fall of Apple Under Tim Apple)

I’m not against apple or favoring android/windows, but I can see a slight decline of Apple in the recent years: Lack of organization in the iPad lineup, Macs being way too expensive and don’t offer consumer priced displays (also M1 Ultra still can’t defeat Nvidia 3090), too much variation and lack of many important features that are already on android(fast charging, better heat management, etc) . The os are falling apart too (universal control failed to work yesterday, IOS starts to get buggy and slow, stage manager on iPad don’t make much sense…...

And now A16 is somehow behind snapdragon Gen2
I remembered just last year (2021) Apple is still ahead of many stuff and 2022 is a mess
Ah the glory days of cheap Apple Mac computers back in 2000-never.
 
Actually it's too late, the project is already past the testing stage
They were testing with preproduction chips.
I had that question a while ago. The answer is, below 2nm it gets very tricky because we are reaching the limit of how small it can get. I mean, after that we would kinda have to move single atoms around...
So unless a new technology is found, we're gonna be stuck at 2nm-ish for a long time.
From what I understand, the plan is to go from 2nm to -2nm. The chips are mostly the same, it's just that the -2nm is upside down. (Stay away from the antimatter variant.)
 
The fall of Apple
(The Fall of Apple Under Tim Apple)

I’m not against apple or favoring android/windows, but I can see a slight decline of Apple in the recent years: Lack of organization in the iPad lineup, Macs being way too expensive and don’t offer consumer priced displays (also M1 Ultra still can’t defeat Nvidia 3090), too much variation and lack of many important features that are already on android(fast charging, better heat management, etc) . The os are falling apart too (universal control failed to work yesterday, IOS starts to get buggy and slow, stage manager on iPad don’t make much sense…...

And now A16 is somehow behind snapdragon Gen2
I remembered just last year (2021) Apple is still ahead of many stuff and 2022 is a mess
Remind me, can the 3090 be used in a laptop? Is it energy efficient? Didn't think so. Different products for different uses.
 
I definitely get excited by the new technology, but I don’t think any of my iPhones have broken a sweat since maybe the X. My 14 Pro Max has this super fast processor. My internet is a decent 500 Mbps. And yet still in 2022 I sit and wait on a website or app to load.
Not to mention the return of "Can you hear me now?" as I walk and drive through more dead spots today than 5 years ago. And I have bars...yet I can't connect to Siri.

5G is a solution looking for a problem - give me more reliable 4G.

Sorry...I guess I got off topic there.😜
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.