Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The Note 4 is going to obliterate the iPhone 6. And just in case the iPhone 6 is still slightly breathing, the Galaxy S6 will surely finish it off

Samsung makes decent screens, but not great phones overall. I'm pretty sure what I've seen of the iPhone 6 is going to sell way better than the Note 4 and/or Galaxy S6 whatever that even is. Samsung is going to be in trouble long term as it doesn't seem they are very profitable. They need to slow down and focus on building a better phone. They are too quick to react to Apple's releases.
 
Should of went quad core and 1080p and 2gb at the least but these specs are embarrassing

The note 4 is rumored to have a 4k display lol

Apple will go to quad core when they can no longer get increased performance out of fast dual cores. Perhaps the A8 will be quad core, but if it's dual, you can bet it will still be competitive with any quad cores on the market in actual use.

4k display? Ok, so 1) you won't be able to see an improvement, 2) it will be even harder to get a smooth UI (not like they're doing that well with that now), and 3) it will be impossible to run 3d games without severe pixel multiplying... Sounds like Samsung!
 
With the iPad's you at least got a decent screen resolution, with these rumours it seems you'll be screwed both on the screen resolution AND the RAM. And no doubt Apple will charge you more for the privilege.

Screen resolution alone is meaningless. What matters is PPI. But PPI above 300 doesn't matter that much, too.

There are other areas for improvement. The Air screen must be the best screen used on a mobile device or close to it (the tab S is better on some areas, worse in others. The kindle hdx has a great screen, etc)

----------

Apple will go to quad core when they can no longer get increased performance out of fast dual cores. Perhaps the A8 will be quad core, but if it's dual, you can bet it will still be competitive with any quad cores on the market in actual use.

4k display? Ok, so 1) you won't be able to see an improvement, 2) it will be even harder to get a smooth UI (not like they're doing that well with that now), and 3) it will be impossible to run 3d games without severe pixel multiplying... Sounds like Samsung!

Clearly the guy is confusing 2k to 4k and has no idea of how the SoC works. A clear case of lack of knowledge, just like the typical Samsung buyer.
 
IF SD slot is present-I take out the SD card, i place it inside new phone.

No SD slot-plug in device into computer, copy device data onto computer, paste the device data into new phone.(same process as moving data from one usb drive to another)

I guess you have no idea what you are talking about. Sorry to say that!
Maybe I didn't explain what I mean with backup/restore:
  • Backup all settings, backgrounds, app data, files, network settings
  • Backup everything on a phone
  • Restore everything by one touch. The restored phone should be an exact copy of the backed up one..

Copying some files from an SD card is not the same.

----------

HTC One M8/Sense says hi. :)

I say hi too. And?

Sense cannot do that! It can maybe restore the background and start installing the apps you had before. All other settings are gone.
App data are gone too.

I have tried that many times and I know what I am writing about.
 
Disappointing if this turns out to be true. Can you imagine if Samsung's Galaxy S5 had these specs? This forum would talk all kinds of trash about that phone. But for some reason when Apple pulls this crap, they get a pass. Go figure

2014 and your phone display is barely a step above 720p? I mean really? C'mon Apple. The "retina display" was cool...4 years ago. Hell, it was even ok in 2011. But 2014? The hell? Not cool bro. And please spare me with the "1080p (or higher) is useless/you can't tell the difference" crap. You can clearly see a difference in the iPhone and Galaxy S5's display. Sammy's display absolutely destroys the 5S.

People can say "having screens with that kinda resolution is useless and unneeded" until they're are blue in the face. If Apple had that same mindset heading into the iPhone 4, the retina display would've never came into existence.

If you were knowledgeable enough, you would know that Galaxy S5 uses a pentile matrix display, and in fact has a lower ppi than iPhone 5s, using red and blue pixels (305 ppi). Only using green pixels (432 ppi) is the s5 screen sharper than the 5s one. :eek::eek::eek::eek:
 
Please provide proof saying that that CPU/GPU is more powerful than A7, let alone A8 in iPhone 6.

As far as Wifi is conserned... please :rolleyes: what % of population has a 500 mb/s wifi? :p:p:p:p . And even more importantly, why do you even need a 500 mb/s speed on a phone?? Up to 150 mbps in 5s is more than enough for practically anything over the next several years (and more).

Pointless spec listing is just pure ****, and I am fairly surprised how so called advanced, hardcore, heavy android smartphone users know so little about those very specs :eek:


:apple:

The new 8core is a beast.you will also need that faster WiFi for when you use a 4k TV and want to blast 4k video to it from your cell but I don't think the iPhone 6 records in 4k either so they don't need it yet.The galaxy s5 can record ultra HD 4k video and 5 minutes of recording is over 1.8GB of space and needs USB 3.0 to transfer that bandwidth without it getting chopy

That's also using heavy compression as uncompressed 4k video rgb at 24fps is about 466mb per second.

Let's say you have 20GB of music you want to sync over also. Would you rather use 150mb/sec or 500? Seriously why do some of you hate on anything better then what apple gives you?
 

Attachments

  • Exynos-5433.jpg
    Exynos-5433.jpg
    99.6 KB · Views: 125
Last edited:
Screen resolution alone is meaningless. What matters is PPI. But PPI above 300 doesn't matter that much, too.

There are other areas for improvement. The Air screen must be the best screen used on a mobile device or close to it (the tab S is better on some areas, worse in others. The kindle hdx has a great screen, etc)

----------



Clearly the guy is confusing 2k to 4k and has no idea of how the SoC works. A clear case of lack of knowledge, just like the typical Samsung buyer.

Um no I said rumored to have a 4k display and I know the difference between 2k and 4k .

There were rumors of the note 4 getting the snapdragon 810 64bit along with a 4k screen.

----------

http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/547986/20140414/samsung-galaxy-note-4-features-specs-release.htm#.VAKzhoHD_qA
 
Apple is indeed powerfull.. They havent spoken many words about an iwatch and since the idea of an iwatch emerged it has spawned an entire new product.

I wish apple would say just one word about a hoverboard in the works and they could just lay back and reverse tech when time comes.

Imagine people thinking about only what you are thinking and creating what they think you think.
 
The new 8core is a beast.you will also need that faster WiFi for when you use a 4k TV and want to blast 4k video to it from your cell but I don't think the iPhone 6 records in 4k either so they don't need it yet.The galaxy s5 can record ultra HD 4k video and 5 minutes of recording is over 1.8GB of space and needs USB 3.0 to transfer that bandwidth without it getting chopy


Apple stated that the a7 was almost twice as fast as the a6 so how would the a8 stand in that test image?
 
Apple stated that the a7 was almost twice as fast as the a6 so how would the a8 stand in that test image?

We will find out soon enough but you can see it beating the crap out of the a7 but the a8 is staying dual core while the new exynos can use all 8 cores at the same time for max performance.how much more can they get staying dual core? There big jump in performance was going to the new 64 bit instruction set and there is no newer arch from arm yet for apple to use because they already jumped to 64 bit first before everyone else did.

A6 to a7 was a huge arch change but a7 to a8 will be same arch with maybe better GPU and faster clocks.
 
Last edited:
I bet Samsung is SO EXCITED to see all the new and innovative elements added to the latest iPhone - I mean, they can added to Galaxy!! "We LOVED the finger print thing last year"

Same with the iwatch. They can hardly wait!
 
False, the Galaxy is more practical and is more dynamic. That's your problem. My S5 hardly uses any RAM and maybe that device has too many software bugs? Touchwiz is simply a great OS skin and does everything I need for me. The Note 4 and G3 are the best phones for 2014. iPhone 6 pales in comparison vs the mainstays.

More dynamic? Wtf are you talking about? That's so vague in the context of smartphones that it's meaningless.

It makes no sense to respond with "False" to a post with links to objective, accurate sources without any justification. I hate to accuse anyone of this, but considering how senseless your post was: are you being paid by Samsung? It's well-known that they pay people to disparage their competitors on internet forums, and pre-iPhone launch is probably when the budget for that type of stuff is at its peak.

Also, it's painfully clear that English isn't your first language. For instance, "does everything I need for me" should be "does everything I need it to." And for that matter, what exactly about the S5 being "more dynamic" makes "it" my problem? Trolling forums [successfully] most definitely isn't your strong suit.

This type of behavior is disgusting: http://www.theverge.com/2013/10/24/5023658/samsung-fined-340000-for-posting-negative-htc-reviews
 
This 4.7 iPhone is going to have a hell of a battle with the galaxy alpha that in my opinion looks awesome and is out speced the iPhone in every segment.

Cat 6 modem
8 core CPU
New h80 WiFi 500mb/sec
6core GPU
2gb ram

Is it me or do we all feel like apple is raping us

Is this a bad joke? Considering that the A7 in the 5S is still quicker than the Snapdragon 801 in the GS5 (and the 801 is marginally faster than Exynos 5422 in CPU performance and massively faster in GPU performance), it's a near certainty that A8 will be quicker than the Exynos 5430, which is the 5422's 20nm successor with slightly better clocks.

Samsung, once again, is trying to appeal to the crowd that believes higher number = faster/better, and hopes they're too ignorant to actually learn anything more about the subject and see what the numbers actually mean. They did the same thing with the GS5 camera -- going for a high megapixel count and ruining it by failing to give it a great sensor to match.

If we want to discuss the Android competition to the upcoming iPhone 6, the HTC One M8 quite easily exceeds the performance, design, and software of the S5. LG has made massive strides and their last two flagship efforts, the G2 & G3, have also exceeded Samsung's S4 & S5, respectively. Between stronger competition on the Android high-end, and being undercut by Huawei & Lenovo on the low-end, Samsung's days of dominance within Android are numbered, let alone being a credible competitor to Apple's offerings.
 
Last edited:
We will find out soon enough but you can see it beating the crap out of the a7 but the a8 is staying dual core while the new exynos can use all 8 cores at the same time for max performance.how much more can they get staying dual core? There big jump in performance was going to the new 64 bit instruction set and there is no newer arch from arm yet for apple to use because they already jumped to 64 bit first before everyone else did.

A6 to a7 was a huge arch change but a7 to a8 will be same arch with maybe better GPU and faster clocks.

If the a6 and a7 is any indication, we gain more to be quiet about apple's SoC subject. That way we do not look stupid when they blow our minds, like they did the last 2 times.

Both processors used on the Galaxy S5 are inferior to the a7 used on the 5s on a huge number of metrics. Heck, the Exynos version is crap on any device, and Samsung usually supports the Qualcomm version way longer.

Lets hope the note 4 has a Qualcomm chip, but clearly Apple is the master of SoC designing here. Not that it matters, if they keep the 1 GB of RAM. Still, with so many AMD engineers signed in the last few years, we know a huge GPU push is imminent. We also now that having the LTE modem integrated on Apple's SoC (by by Qualcom) is also around the corner... Intel already did it.
 
It s not 3x retina. It's 3x the number of lines (vertical and horizontal) of the original iphone resolution (elongated for the 16 by 9 aspect ratio since the iphone 5.

I understand that, but the original iPhone resolution elongated for the iPhone 5 is 568x320, which at 3x would be 1704x960, not the random 2208 x 1242 (736 x 414) resolution quoted here.
 
The new 8core is a beast.you will also need that faster WiFi for when you use a 4k TV and want to blast 4k video to it from your cell but I don't think the iPhone 6 records in 4k either so they don't need it yet.The galaxy s5 can record ultra HD 4k video and 5 minutes of recording is over 1.8GB of space and needs USB 3.0 to transfer that bandwidth without it getting chopy

That's also using heavy compression as uncompressed 4k video rgb at 24fps is about 466mb per second.

Let's say you have 20GB of music you want to sync over also. Would you rather use 150mb/sec or 500? Seriously why do some of you hate on anything better then what apple gives you?

Out of curiosity, do you know:

- That the A7 is soon to be 1 year old;
- Antutu is very very poorly optimized for iOS, and because of that it isn't even used on any review on any website;
- Most Apps (really, almost 100 %) only take advantage of 1 or 2 cores, and the A7 core per core destroys everything else;
- The iPhone is the fastest device on most CPU based benchmarks, even those that do not mirror real situations, and in all GPU benchmarks when the screen is on?

So the iPhone 5s is by far the fastest device being sold today.

Do you also know that speed only matters or certain apps and OS support (longevity), and the iPhone has all the best and most demanding apps and games, and is also by far the most supported device? I mean, the international version of the S3 (exynos quad core) didn't get kitkat!

So your all post is pointless, biased, wrong and a huge waste of time? Do you also know what a pentile display is? And that a full HD resolution is pointless ON A 4" screen? Do you know that the iPhone's screen is overall at least on par with the S5 overall and way better on most metrics? (white colors, brightness, accuracy, longevity, non-pentile PPI, etc.)?

Your posts are an waste of time. Inform yourself.
 
I think his points are very valid on a flagship phone released at the end of 2014. There are more than just specs but I do expect a minimum spec level. And 1GB is not enough on the 5S and definitely the iPad.

I'm not sure wtf you guys go off of what is enough and what isn't. Does it run everything you download? Yes? You have enough ram...
 
Not at all. I love Apple and have done for many, many years. Just from the picture in the article it looked like it was just a taller screen, as with the iPhone 5 from the 4S.
Then you must be blind. It's obviously 16:9. Both taller and wider.
 
Interviewer asks Tim Cook: You said that 4 inch is the perfect size for a phone display to comfortably hold it in one hand, so why did you introduce a 4.7 inch screen on the new iPhone?

Tim Cook: Well, because of Apple's mind blowing engineering achievements you can now magically hold the 4.7 inch iPhone in one hand.
 
Interviewer asks Tim Cook: You said that 4 inch is the perfect size for a phone display to comfortably hold it in one hand, so why did you introduce a 4.7 inch screen on the new iPhone?

Tim Cook: Well, because of Apple's mind blowing engineering achievements you can now magically hold the 4.7 inch iPhone in one hand.

Source please?
 
There needs to be a 5,5" model with 2gb ram and a significantly improved battery life over 5S. Otherwise, not interested. Even if they made it 3/4 thinner and tripled the cpu/gpu power.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.