I want a complete redesign of the software. The current Front Row-based stuff is crap.
Give us a 1TB and 2TB models please in the form of an iTunes server that hooks to the TV.
... if AEBS could also function as an iTunes server.
It'd be trivial to hang a large drive off the back of an AEBS and use it to drive a whole house full of AirTunes devices and AppleTVs. The average household could have whole-house audio, and three TVs all with access to a complete media library. Throw in a couple of Touches serving as remotes, and you have a very slick set up for under 2K.
Who needs 40GB when you can stream everything from your computer (or in my case, my 4TB NAS)?
I say replace the 40GB with a 8-16GB SSD (for OS and caching) and be done with it.
It'd be trivial to hang a large drive off the back of an AEBS and use it to drive a whole house full of AirTunes devices and AppleTVs. The average household could have whole-house audio, and three TVs all with access to a complete media library. Throw in a couple of Touches serving as remotes, and you have a very slick set up for under 2K.
I really can't see this happening. There is no such thing as *an* HDTV tuner. Each different region is going to need different tuners and TV listings, and in most cases there'll be no support for cable or satellite.
A recorder can still work in that it'd just take an HDMI in, and record the signal, however the experience would be far from what most users expect when they hear 'P/DVR' so Apple are highly unlikely to do it.
Frankly, the crucial short-coming of the AppleTV (1080p aside) is really in the iTunes model, and the Airport Extreme. AppleTVs would be left more or less as they are if AEBS could also function as an iTunes server.
It'd be trivial to hang a large drive off the back of an AEBS and use it to drive a whole house full of AirTunes devices and AppleTVs. The average household could have whole-house audio, and three TVs all with access to a complete media library. Throw in a couple of Touches serving as remotes, and you have a very slick set up for under 2K.
Are we finally going to see Apple transition the Apple TV from a "hobby" to an actual proud product with some huge innovation?
I don't know why people care about the size of ATV. Just stream it! WIth wireless 'N' it shouldn't be a problem. Even with 'G'. I hope they aren't focusing on raising the storage. That would be a rip-off and waste of time.
Remove the hard drive, stick in a small SSD for the OS, add a Firewire 800 port for an external hard drive and let users add their own drives or stream their content from the computer. Then have a second model with an inbuilt 3.5" hard drive for users that wish not to do this.
Give us a 1TB and 2TB models please in the form of an iTunes server that hooks to the TV. 40GB model is just ridiculous with today's HD content and the general size of people's libraries.
Are we finally going to see Apple transition the Apple TV from a "hobby" to an actual proud product with some huge innovation?
I want a full DVR, i.e. Big HDD (500 GB or more), TV tuner (maybe dual), 1080p output via HDMI, etc. Faster processor (FYI, it's a 1 GHz Pentium M), more RAM, better GPU.
I want it to be fully networkable, i.e. I can get recordings anywhere in the house.
I want Blu-Ray.
I want a complete redesign of the software. The current Front Row-based stuff is crap.
And it needs to cost no more than what it does now.
That's about it. I'll let you know if there's anything else 🙂.
I think since it's clear DRM isn't going away on the VIDEO (and app) part of the iTMS any time soon, I think this is where Apple is considering a subscription service. In otherwords: Apple Cable.
Stream all the shows you want each month for $40. All the Movies and shows you want for $60. the money goes directly to the studios, not to comcast/TW
TV a DVR, they are going to need to ship with more than the standard Apple Remote. I will want to manually key in channels, etc. However, I suppose if they could come up with an intuitive "Favorite Channels" functionality, I could use that.