I've read through the last six or seven threads on BT clients in OS X, and figured I'd make a collective one to chat about clients and such. So without further ado, which client do you use? Which have you tried? Which are you looking forward to?
I currently use a combination of Transmission and BitRocket. Bitrocket is the most visually attractive (and µTorrent-like) client I've seen, but its critical flaw is the lack of selective downloading. This is why I kept Transmission. If I'm downloading something where I don't need file selection, I get it in BR. If I need to cherry-pick, I use Transmission. Once a dl is done, I delete it from Transmission (due to the poor space management), and seed it in BR (which has a traditional horizontal line spacing for torrents).
I have no idea why the developers of Transmission haven't seen fit to rearrange the GUI. If they did that, it would become a far more viable client, and alternative to Azureus. There's simply no way a vertical client can handle more than a dozen torrents at a time. I can't imagine it's that difficult to code. BR, in the meantime, doesn't even seem to be developed anymore.
Despite the bother of using two clients, I just can't use Azureus. Can't stand to look at it, and can't stand to configure it. I also tried BitTyrant, which was just a relabeled Azureus, BitTorrent, which was hopeless, Tomato Torrent, which was sort of a joke, and a few Unix clients which wanted me to compile them (not bloody likely). So I went back to BR and Transmission.
Anyway, that's my story. Nothing comes close to µTorrent, but I'm trying to keep an open mind...
I currently use a combination of Transmission and BitRocket. Bitrocket is the most visually attractive (and µTorrent-like) client I've seen, but its critical flaw is the lack of selective downloading. This is why I kept Transmission. If I'm downloading something where I don't need file selection, I get it in BR. If I need to cherry-pick, I use Transmission. Once a dl is done, I delete it from Transmission (due to the poor space management), and seed it in BR (which has a traditional horizontal line spacing for torrents).
I have no idea why the developers of Transmission haven't seen fit to rearrange the GUI. If they did that, it would become a far more viable client, and alternative to Azureus. There's simply no way a vertical client can handle more than a dozen torrents at a time. I can't imagine it's that difficult to code. BR, in the meantime, doesn't even seem to be developed anymore.
Despite the bother of using two clients, I just can't use Azureus. Can't stand to look at it, and can't stand to configure it. I also tried BitTyrant, which was just a relabeled Azureus, BitTorrent, which was hopeless, Tomato Torrent, which was sort of a joke, and a few Unix clients which wanted me to compile them (not bloody likely). So I went back to BR and Transmission.
Anyway, that's my story. Nothing comes close to µTorrent, but I'm trying to keep an open mind...