Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Does this mean that at this rate sometime in the next 3 years my mac will stop running like a dog everytime I use YouTube or watch a video on Engadget?
 
well it looks like adobe will lose. lol

if mobile computing is to dominate in the future. then the standards set by apple will also dominate.
 
Does this mean that at this rate sometime in the next 3 years my mac will stop running like a dog everytime I use YouTube or watch a video on Engadget?

i think it just means that engadget and youtube wil change over to meet higher demand
 
So how do I watch HTML 5 content on my iPad, does Apple plan on forcing us to use Quicktime forever?
 
Will someone please show the NFL these statistics and ask them to bring their site into the 21st century as well? Thanks.

the html5 video is all user generated crap that doesn't need any protection or DRM. even Google is using Flash for video that needs DRM protection. i don't know of any html5 solution to protect video from being downloaded that the owner doesn't want downloaded

even apple is using itunes/quicktime instead of the web for rented video playback
 
How are they getting on with converting all the Flash Vector Animations (What flash was actually made for in the 1st place) to something the iPad/iPhone will play?
 
While Flash is far from great on mobile devices....i have used it on my Evo randomly from time to time.


Good to have if needed...nothing more nothing less. Those who never want it on their mobile devices don't make sense to me.....you have the option to keep it off completely. (mine is set to "On Demand" so i click a flash element anytime i need to use it.
 
How are they getting on with converting all the Flash Vector Animations (What flash was actually made for in the 1st place) to something the iPad/iPhone will play?

We're talking about Flash video, not Flash animations.


Those who never want it on their mobile devices don't make sense to me....

Flash isn't designed for touch screens. The demos of Flash on mobile platforms as shown that it can work, but it is pretty poor and half the time didn't work (see Engadget's tests).

I'm disappointed that the BBC still uses Flash..
 
the html5 video is all user generated crap that doesn't need any protection or DRM. even Google is using Flash for video that needs DRM protection. i don't know of any html5 solution to protect video from being downloaded that the owner doesn't want downloaded

even apple is using itunes/quicktime instead of the web for rented video playback

That's simply not true. HTML5 video is agnostic of DRM. Videos may easily be obfuscated within HTML5. And DRM may be implemented within the H.264 encapsulation of the video itself, completely separate from the HTML5. Just because nobody's doing it *now* doesn't mean that it can't be done. Apple, in their restrictive lovefest with DRM, wouldn't be investing so heavily in it if that were the case.
 
let's not all get our panties in a wad. flash video is still a viable option, for now. it probably won't be in a couple of years, unless adobe makes some radical changes. :apple:
 
We're talking about Flash video, not Flash animations.




Flash isn't designed for touch screens. The demos of Flash on mobile platforms as shown that it can work, but it is pretty poor and half the time didn't work (see Engadget's tests).

I'm disappointed that the BBC still uses Flash..

In my uses (which has admittedly been limited) i have actually been happy with how flash has worked on my phone. I'm not saying its GREAT...again, its not....but with a good connection, it runs smooth on my phone for video and music also runs just fine.

So i'm saying i could live without it...but i'm happy i don't have to.
 
let's not all get our panties in a wad. flash video is still a viable option, for now. it probably won't be in a couple of years, unless adobe makes some radical changes. :apple:

Adobe Air is going to be pretty big for adobe i think.
 
Good to have if needed...nothing more nothing less. Those who never want it on their mobile devices don't make sense to me.....you have the option to keep it off completely. (mine is set to "On Demand" so i click a flash element anytime i need to use it.

That would be great but unfortunately it would cause a huge amount of butt hurt to the turtle necked overlord.
 
We're talking about Flash video, not Flash animations.

This is the problem

Tell many people Video's don't need Flash and they think that's that then job done.
They don't realise Video was just a side trick that Flash also did, along with it's main reason for existence.
 
I don't have a smartphone, and I've yet to see HTML5 outside of youtube beta. So I'm more curious of statistic that shows how many sites offer HTML5, because such a high number could simply be the result of youtube offering HTML5 than anything else. Statistic could be misleading sometimes, so I found it weird, considering that I don't know of any other site that offers HTML5 video. Then again, I don't have a smart phone, so maybe it's a smart phone thing.
 
I don't have a smartphone, and I've yet to see HTML5 outside of youtube beta. So I'm more curious of statistic that shows how many sites offer HTML5, because such a high number could simply be the result of youtube offering HTML5 than anything else. Statistic could be misleading sometimes, so I found it weird, considering that I don't know of any other site that offers HTML5 video. Then again, I don't have a smart phone, so maybe it's a smart phone thing.

Can't just be youtube, since youtube was already offering html5 video back when the number was 18%.
 
Flash will be dominate until ads stops using flash.

Well they better stop quickly, because less and less of their customer base is able to see them.

More important statistic is that means 46% of the web is not is not ready for HTML5 and requires Flash. I wrote up an analysis this weekend of what I think is going on here. http://blog.cyphers.net/2010/10/24/other-peoples-toys/

Nope, it means that 46% of the web that streams videos (or does dumb assed animations) is not ready for HTML5 because they are either lazy or don't want me visiting their site.

Edit: Your blog page rendered nicely on my iPad. Good job.
While Flash is far from great on mobile devices....i have used it on my Evo randomly from time to time.




Good to have if needed...nothing more nothing less. Those who never want it on their mobile devices don't make sense to me.....you have the option to keep it off completely. (mine is set to "On Demand" so i click a flash element anytime i need to use it.

Because I want web masters to stop using it. Quit going to flash sites and they will have to convert to get the traffic back up (or make an ad free app). It may 'hurt' a while, but you will get over it. I use the web only on my ipad. My bank's website, 401k, and health insurance sites all work on the iPad. TD Ameritrade created an app, but years ago I used to use TD Ameritrade on my WM PDA , I haven't tried their site on my iPad cause their app is slick and I use it. Stop settling for a craptacular experience.
 
Yay, those suckers who don't have Flash can now see about half of all the H.264 video on the web...! :rolleyes: And still can see NONE of most other video available on the web.

To boot, a large part of the general "HTML5" video increase is due to the fact that Google encodes 720p+ videos uploaded to Youtube in WebM, which is of course NOT supported by Safari.

And finally, even if all video was magically available in H.264 today, many great sites will still not be available to those without Flash.

Just the facts, ma'am.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.