The iPod has always been a simple device with simple upgrades that add functionality, not just features.
As far as specualtion, I think it will finally get a radio (AM & FM hopefully), fullscreen and the keyboard a la iPhone (think how much easier it will be to find music).
Form factor will remain the same, I don't know about the case, maybe that will take on iPhone characteristics too (being scratchproof).
It is certainly true that the iPod's greatest feature is it's simplicity, like you have said all upgrades add significant functionality. The iPod with a radio sounds legit and will silence many "What the iPod doesn't have a radio? WTH?" reviewers who would probably never use the radio, but it's nice to have for those who enjoy public/talk radio and don't want to wait for the next podcast .
All this other specualtion (web, email, wifi) is ridiculous since they don't really add anything to the media capabilities of the iPod. The way I see it, the iPod is for those who don't want the iPhone.
Reading more of these posts and thinking, I am starting to agree that yes, web, email, even wifi are ridiculous, at least for this point in time. But I see the iPod changing what consumers want rather than consumers changing the iPod. Before my first iPod, I never thought of carrying music in my pocket everywhere or listening to music as I worked out (I hated the weight/form factor of CD players) and airplane rides were fine with the onboard radio/movies, but now, I will not take a jet w/o my iPod nor can I run for 1hr+ w/o an iPod attached to me. That said, I think we'll see a slower integration of all things media. Wifi will certainly come
if it increases functionality and battery life is kept up to par. I don't see the real reason to have wifi unless something Web whether it be browser or Youtube are integrated but the browser would kill sales of the iPhone now, in the future we'll have to see.
[. . .]Apple doing shuffle, nano (variable sizes), iPhone, iPod (low end, variable sizes), iPod (high end, one size?) doesn't make sense. Why have an iPod that's an iPhone with larger storage and no cellphone? It hurts iPhone sales and I don't think Apple is out to do any harm to their new baby (remember ROKR anyone?). Besides the feature-bloat isn't needed on an mp3/photo-viewer/video player.
Apple has continued to sell their various sizes of iPod, I think that they are here to stay for the next few revisions at least, some love the shuffle b/c of its size,
many love the nano because of the integration with Nike+, and it also being a great workout companion. The iPod will likely continue to have just 2 sizes, and the iPhone's marketing should continue to differentiate itself from the iPod, I really think the iPod must become a companion or change it's role to keep up. Who wants an iPhone in 1 pocket and a iPod in the other (or in their purse)?
no one. I'm interested to see how Apple markets each of these without greatly cannibalizing sales. The iPhone could mean the death of the Nano if apps are developed to integrate Nike+. Their similar storage size makes them compete directly, rather than the iPod, but just thinking about these things gets confusing, each one eats the other now. Here's a list more for me than others to get things straight:
1. iPhone eats iPod Nano due to similar storage sizes, developed apps could mean Nike+ is integrated, Nano no longer has much to offer besides being small.
2. Nano has always put the Shuffle in the shadow, lots of people don't see why to own a Shuffle, "just save up some money and buy a nano" is the advice I hear from friends, colleagues, ect. The Shuffle is sort of a fashion statement these days (at least at my university).
3. 6G iPod and iPhone will probably be very similar and it's hard to see who will eat who.
A.Can Apple make iPhone owners want a 6G iPod?
Yes.
B.Will 6G iPod owners want an iPhone?
Maybe.
C.Could the 6G iPod's interface be so amazing that it will set the standard for consumers that the iPhone and it's little brothers (when released) will be the only suitable interface for many looking to purchase new cell phones?
quite possibly
The only way I see YouTube on the iPod is if YouTube gets into iTunes.
All those "features" are why the Archos weighs 22 ounces and why the iPod weighs 6 ounces.
Youtube sound cool but like how would it be integrated? Wifi has to be there but just for Youtube? It boggles the mind. When i think of functionality, it will add a whole new dimension. All these features we speculate sound like things that many users don't want/need which is a likely case. But hey, when I first heard of a iPod Video rumors, I was like,
NO WAY who's going to watch videos on a 2 inch screen for hours? Answer:
millions
I was surprised to see how little the iPod weighs when looking at the numbers, even at 6 ounces it feels heavy sometimes, but man 22 must be a brick. Apple engineers have their work cut out for them to keep up to par of what consumers are expecting. The only thing I know for sure,
FACT about all this isthat the I'll drop my 5G for a 6G the day it comes out.