Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
OS X Snow Leopard Installation Process Changes Described?
- Thread starter mrchinchilla
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
OS X Snow Leopard Installation Process Changes Described?
![]()
AppleInsider has received information detailing a number of changes to the installation process for Apple's forthcoming Mac OS X Snow Leopard in comparison to the process for OS X Leopard. Notable changes include the preservation of minor point updates upon reinstallation, a shifting of Rosetta and QuickTime 7 to optional installs, and removal of the "Erase and Install" and "Archive and Install" options from the basic installer to reduce user confusion, although the options are still available via Disk Utility.
Finally, the report notes that word of a Snow Leopard release as early as August 24th has been suggested, although there is no confirmation of that information at this time. Apple has previously stated that it is scheduling a September launch of the new operating system.
A new Mac OS X Snow Leopard build (10A432) has reportedly been designated "Golden Master", paving the way for manufacturing of optical media for retail distribution. Mac OS X Snow Leopard will be priced at $29 for current OS X Leopard owners, and users purchasing a new Mac on June 8th, 2009 or later can receive the updated operating system for $9.95 though Apple's "Up to Date" program.
Article Link: OS X Snow Leopard Installation Process Changes Described?
AppleInsider has received information detailing a number of changes to the installation process for Apple's forthcoming Mac OS X Snow Leopard in comparison to the process for OS X Leopard. Notable changes include the preservation of minor point updates upon reinstallation, a shifting of Rosetta and QuickTime 7 to optional installs, and removal of the "Erase and Install" and "Archive and Install" options from the basic installer to reduce user confusion, although the options are still available via Disk Utility.
Additionally, the installer will copy a large chunk of data from the installation disc to the user's hard drive at the beginning of the installation process, allowing the bulk of the process to occur on the user's drive rather than constantly transferring data from the optical media. The Snow Leopard installer will also sequester existing applications known to be incompatible with the updated operating system, allowing for more reliable system behavior upon upgrading.
Finally, the report notes that word of a Snow Leopard release as early as August 24th has been suggested, although there is no confirmation of that information at this time. Apple has previously stated that it is scheduling a September launch of the new operating system.
A new Mac OS X Snow Leopard build (10A432) has reportedly been designated "Golden Master", paving the way for manufacturing of optical media for retail distribution. Mac OS X Snow Leopard will be priced at $29 for current OS X Leopard owners, and users purchasing a new Mac on June 8th, 2009 or later can receive the updated operating system for $9.95 though Apple's "Up to Date" program.
Article Link: OS X Snow Leopard Installation Process Changes Described?
Seems to confirm the idea that you are not going to be able to install it on blank drive.
No way it is getting released early.
No way it is getting released early.
It's good to see more stuff make it back to Optional Installs.
It will be just as confusing then.MacRumors said:
I wonder how this is handled OS wise. There's probably a do not touch folder and some new package installing scheme for updates.MacRumors said:
So wait... Has the OPTION to Archive and Install been removed, or does it always automatically Archive and Install when upgrading, keeping the current apps and preferences installed?
Guess I'll be doing a clean install! Not the end of the world I guess.
Guess I'll be doing a clean install! Not the end of the world I guess.
I'm all for a lack of Product Codes that Microsoft has, but really, it seems like at times those might be easier. I could install Snow Leopard on a blank drive and just enter my Leopard product code. (Like Apple lets you do for Final Cut upgrade installs on a new machine.)
This whole $29 thing is really just making it a big hassle for the way some people normally upgrade.
That said, for the average Mac user, the Leopard-->Snow Leopard transition is a LOT easier than XP or Vista-->Windows 7.
The August 24 tidbit is really interesting, but that is really quick turnaround, no? How long between GM and release for other versions of Mac OS X?
This whole $29 thing is really just making it a big hassle for the way some people normally upgrade.
That said, for the average Mac user, the Leopard-->Snow Leopard transition is a LOT easier than XP or Vista-->Windows 7.
The August 24 tidbit is really interesting, but that is really quick turnaround, no? How long between GM and release for other versions of Mac OS X?
The sentence before seems to contradict that idea. If you click erase and install, iThink that its clear the whole point is to erase.
However, "Erase and Install" remains available through Disk Utility, which is also included on the installation DVD.
Wouldn't that work on blank drives?
The option to Archive and Install has been moved from the basic installer to Disk Utility, which can be run from the installation DVD. However, if you want to keep all your apps and preferences and everything, what you want is probably Upgrade, not Archive and Install. Upgrade is the default, and will now be the only option in the basic installer.
So if it was $99, it'd be easier?
The last GM to OS X was I believe 7 days, which I was most people seem to be calling BS on the GM statements.
I would suspect the rumor about SL reaching GM is in fact true. If you go to Apple's website and go to the Mac OS X page, it defaults to Snow Leopard now, not Leopard.
Been doing that for a while.
*fixed
And what do you mean? It says "Erase & Install" but you think its only going to erase?
What are you basing that off of? None of us actually knows how the $29 upgrade disc is going to work, I bet it won't be a hassle at all. The only reason people are getting headaches over it is cuz they're arguing about how it's gonna be done, when the truth is none of us knows for sure anyway. We just have to wait and see (and according to this article, we may be waiting less than 2 weeks!)
The standard install appears to be like Archive & Install. It's the new clean installation method unless you really have to wipe the drive. You'll end up wiping your saved updates though.
If you click Erase & Install, it seems like you would be aware that it's going to erase everything and then do the upgrade. How many users seriously think that when they click that, it is not going to erase.
We're getting so close!Does anyone know if I can pick up my "up to date" disk at the Apple Store, or will I have to wait for it in the mail? I'd like to go to the launch...
If your speaking of the general, isn't that why they put it in DU instead of the main installer window? If your going to install a new blank HD yourself, I guess they would think you'd know where to go to install 10.6 on it.
I don't see the masses of people automatically going to DU to do a simple upgrade.
Does anyone know if I can pick up my "up to date" disk at the Apple Store, or will I have to wait for it in the mail? I'd like to go to the launch...
I plan on going just for the T-Shirts.
I would suspect the rumor about SL reaching GM is in fact true. If you go to Apple's website and go to the Mac OS X page, it defaults to Snow Leopard now, not Leopard.
FWIW, Apple charged my card Monday for the up-to-date program copy of SL.
I don't quite like that I can't install on a blank drive though.
I agree, I think the moving of "Erase & Install" is more confusing. Seriously Apple, do people really go to "Erase & Install" think this won't erase their harddrive? If people do that, they have to go out of their way to get to that option so they must know what they're doing.
If not, they deserve it for not reading.
If not, they deserve it for not reading.
why must they get my hopes up by saying its gonna get released early? I'll be expecting late August/early September when, chances are, its gonna be released late september. great.