you clearly know nothing about thatNegative. They still throttle but give you a toggle if you would rather have that wonderful experience of your phone randomly crashing under load.
you clearly know nothing about thatNegative. They still throttle but give you a toggle if you would rather have that wonderful experience of your phone randomly crashing under load.
Have you ever had a car? Because this is why you wind up having to replace car batteries - the battery can no longer handle the peak load of starting the engine, and it refuses to turn over.Your statement is ridiculous
I’ve NEVER, EVER had ANY device that shuts down itself because the battery is “old”. I have a PSP that’s 8 years old and it still works like when it was new. It hasn’t slowed down, it just works. If iPhones shutdown because of that it’s a design flaw of their cpu, because I repeat, I’ve never had any other device shutting down because of this.
Apple was NOT up front and honest. They got caught lying about it
the point is that the psp never started to lag after 2 years of degradation, like losing FPS in games. why? because sony optimized it in a right way.
The voice of reason... thank God someone in here isn’t drunk on the koolaid.... it is a design flaw and Apple is throttling to hide it, they don’t want to have to be forced to freely repair or replace millions of iPhones.
They have all the consumer or government investigations to conclude in this yet.. I’m hopeful for huge fines. Take them down a peg or two, not like they don’t need it!
In my room now I’ve got 8 devices with the same battery tech as my 6S, not ONE of them shuts down at 20 or 30% or dump 10% battery in under a minute and turn off! My 6S does though!...
I’ve never had ANY device do it EVER and I’ve been using gadgets with rechargeable batteries for 20 years plus!
When Apple released the patch that allowed me to take off throttling, I of course turned it off.
The app showed my battery life at 85% capacity. Wait... it had throttled my phone at 85%??? Seriously?
I believe Apple lied to the majority of phone users about why they throttled them. Sure, perhaps a small percentage of phones did have the alleged problem they tried to fix with the throttling. Not mine, and not thousands of others I'm sure. Now, I am also not entirely convinced it was a money making scheme, but it certainly could have been.
But Android hasn't fixed the issue. have you ever tried to use a two-year-old plus Android device no thank you. The battery life is so short it's unusable (or is slower then beans lmao). Really the technology just needs to get better. On the one side you have Android manufacturers throwing their hands up saying we don't slow our phones down but yet after 2 to 3 years their phones run like garbage because the battery is having the same issues as Apple. The other hand not saying that Apple what's right in this case. Apple should have been a little more transparent as to why they were slowing the phones down and people just need to get over themselves.I still don't understand why they can't fix the underlying problem when Android has.
nope. it will throttle is battery below 10% ..I thought Apple stopped slowing down iPhones after it became well known they were doing it...?
Yeah and the iPhone battery deteriorates to the point of needing a replacement after 2 years as well. My 7 Plus needing a replacement 2 years after launch. Also no Amdroid throttled or shuts down after 2 year and the news you read on this are isolated instances unlike this throttling. I have devices from 2013 which flat out reject this theory.But Android hasn't fixed the issue. have you ever tried to use a two-year-old plus Android device no thank you. The battery life is so short it's unusable (or is slower then beans lmao). Really the technology just needs to get better. On the one side you have Android manufacturers throwing their hands up saying we don't slow our phones down but yet after 2 to 3 years their phones run like garbage because the battery is having the same issues as Apple. The other hand not saying that Apple what's right in this case. Apple should have been a little more transparent as to why they were slowing the phones down and people just need to get over themselves.
Anyone who has the $75 can file a lawsuit. Another publicity stunt by a lawyer seeking some attention with a worthless lawsuit that will go nowhere. People mistakenly think just because someone files a suit, it has merit or that the plaintiffs will receive anything.
No doubt. Painting it as a negative is ridiculous. It was by design to fix a problem people were having with their phone crashing when the processor requested more power than the battery could safely supply because of degradation. The pretzeled logic of “hey, let’s slow down everyone’s older phones to give them a reason to upgrade” would have been insane. How likely are you to upgrade to another iPhone after just having a very frustrating experience? It is inanity.
Not to go too off topic here, but you’re critique is that of the very basis of our modern consumer oriented economy. It’s applicable to everything you’ve ever purchased in your life other than food.
I’d read “the lightbulb conspiracy” if you’re interested in the origins of this production philosophy, it goes back over 100 years.
This is just a jumbled misunderstanding of the issue.
The batteries themselves are not defective. The issue arises when the battery degraded (which is just how chemistry works, not a flaw) to the point where they couldn’t supply the peak draw of the processor under certain circumstances (it’s not that the batteries can’t deliver, it’s that a naturally degraded battery can’t. This is an important distinction) which resulted in a safety shutdown.
I say safety because all the news stories of vaporizers blowing up are the result of batteries not handling peak loads (which is high with a heating element) but the pens still trying anyway which results in a runaway thermal process.
Now, clearly their testing was not correct as phones were passing while the throttling still occurred. You’re 100% right on that point. But none of this was EVER about defective *batteries* themselves.
No I would rather have my phone not shutdown at all like all other phones."I would have much rather had my phone randomly shut down during inconvenient times, particularly when under a heavy load indicating I'm actually using it for something!" -all of these people, apparently.
(And directly below that, in his footer...)
I'm sure you'll understand if I'm somewhat skeptical of your assertions.
The batteries themselves are not defective. The issue arises when the battery degraded (which is just how chemistry works, not a flaw) to the point where they couldn’t supply the peak draw of the processor under certain circumstances (it’s not that the batteries can’t deliver, it’s that a naturally degraded battery can’t. This is an important distinction) which resulted in a safety shutdown.
Uhhh...It's been built into Android for quite a while:Yeah and the iPhone battery deteriorates to the point of needing a replacement after 2 years as well. My 7 Plus needing a replacement 2 years after launch. Also no Amdroid throttled or shuts down after 2 year and the news you read on this are isolated instances unlike this throttling. I have devices from 2013 which flat out reject this theory.
Thank you for editing that clearly insulting remark out.Apple always provides a partial truth narrative for people to repeat, knowing that most will stop questioning after that.
But there are still some unanswered questions, such as:
1. If common battery degradation was the primary reason, why didn't it affect all previous iPhones?
2. If this was all natural, why didn't Apple foresee it, instead of belatedly patching the OS after phones began shutting down?
1. Do you think Apple has been using the same batteries for every generation of phone? It's a genuine question, because if not...there's your answer.
On your other point, Android does have it, as I posted. It's the same logic being used in Apple's OS
but it appears to notify individual apps rather than the OS, which would result in some inconsistent behavior I'd imagine.