and as I recall the McDonald's lawsuit did have some merits. In that McDonalds did keep their coffee at what was arguably unreasonably high temperatures.
arn
I'm going to sound like an ass here, but can you really fix stupid?
At some point people have to take responsibility for themselves... not blame every error on someone else. I don't want to live in a society where there's warnings plastered everywhere because people do stupid things. "Caution, this oven is hot" "Warning, this glass is transparent" "Careful, this outlet has a current, and can shock you."
I'm going to sound like an ass here, but can you really fix stupid?
At some point people have to take responsibility for themselves... not blame every error on someone else. I don't want to live in a society where there's warnings plastered everywhere because people do stupid things. "Caution, this oven is hot" "Warning, this glass is transparent" "Careful, this outlet has a current, and can shock you."
Agreed, that one particular McDonald's was proven to be using scalding levels, way above recommended temperatures, and I believe the lid was defective. We did a case study in school. It sounds ridiculous, but the women involved was covered in 3rd degree burns and literally had to relearn how to walk. Some lawsuits have merit, this Apple one isn't one of them.
But see, I don't think it's a matter of stupidity. It's a matter of engineering and user interface, which Apple should be sensitive too.
That woman who sued McDonald's over the hot coffee. She burned herself severely. Was she stupid? That's what everyone said. But a certain number of people are going to spill coffee on themselves in a given year. Is it ok that McDonald's raised the temperature so high it would cause 3rd degree burns in 2-3 seconds? My opinion is no, it's not ok, and McDonald's hadn't changed the temperature even after many other people had burned themselves.
A friend of mine took an engineering design class, and told me a story from it that I remember stuck with me. So this nuclear power plant had a control panel, but it was physically impossible to reach that panel without standing on another control panel. So, let's say something terrible happened because one of the workers accidentally flipped a switch with his foot. Sure, you could say the worker was stupid and it was his fault for not watching where his feet went. But in reality, it's the fault of whoever designed the control panel locations.
How many people are going to crash into Apple doors this year? Just 1 or 2? Ok, maybe that's just negligence on the part of the people walking, and they should pay more attention. Is the number closer to 100? 1000? At some point it is a design issue, and not a stupidity issue.
arn
Oh, give me a break. This is on the "McDonalds Hot Cofee in my Lap" level.
There are in fact building safety code regulations regarding glass walls and doors (hence the stickers on the window). If she is suing maybe her lawyer believes Apple was not adhering to the standards for this county and state (maybe stickers on doors were at wrong height or too small). However, if Apple was adhering to the safety regulations then this lady should be suing the county instead. They would be hard-pressed to make money off Apple if they were in complete safety compliance.
And the cost of cleaning their windowApple took reasonable care to prevent such an occurrence. She didn't. She should be ordered to pay Apple for the costs of defending this frivolous suit.
But see, I don't think it's necessarily a matter of stupidity. It's a matter of engineering and user interface, which Apple should be sensitive too.
That woman who sued McDonald's over the hot coffee. She burned herself severely. Was she stupid? That's what everyone said. But a certain number of people are going to spill coffee on themselves in a given year. Is it ok that McDonald's raised the temperature so high it would cause 3rd degree burns in 2-3 seconds? My opinion is no, it's not ok, and McDonald's hadn't changed the temperature even after many other people had burned themselves.
A friend of mine took an engineering design class, and told me a story from it that I remember stuck with me. So this nuclear power plant had a control panel, but it was physically impossible to reach that panel without standing on another control panel. So, let's say something terrible happened because one of the workers accidentally flipped a switch with his foot. Sure, you could say the worker was stupid and it was his fault for not watching where his feet went. But in reality, it's the fault of whoever designed the control panel locations.
How many people are going to crash into Apple doors this year? Just 1 or 2? Ok, maybe that's just negligence on the part of the people walking, and they should pay more attention. Is the number closer to 100? 1000? At some point it becomes a design issue, and not a stupidity issue.
arn
Oh, give me a break. This is on the "McDonalds Hot Cofee in my Lap" level.
But see, I don't think it's necessarily a matter of stupidity. It's a matter of engineering and user interface, which Apple should be sensitive too.
Is the number closer to 100? 1000? At some point it becomes a design issue, and not a stupidity issue.
arn
That said, there are some instances where poor design is blatant (like your example), but glass being transparent (with clearly visible doors) is not in my opinion-- it's almost innate knowledge.