Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
A Closer Look at Apple's Next-Generation 'Unibody' iPhone Design
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
My goodness, a visitor from a planet where leaked product shots and rumors count as 'marketing'. Have you been on Earth for very long?
When I go to buy a phone, I always ask "Does this look at the same as a previous product? If it does, I won't buy it. Money doesn't grow on trees and I have my priorities straight, you know."
Seriously, 6 months ago this forum was plastered with comments about how 3.5 was the only size ever needed and any bigger would be ridiculous. Now everyone loves it. Lol no wonder apple does whatever it feels like. They could literally release identical products over and over and their fans would never stop buying them.
Apple is going to shatter iPhone sales records once this bad boy is released. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
I've opened my current and previous unibody MBPs more than a couple of times and I've never seen such coarse tooling tracks.
Maybe it's because the innards of an iPhone aren't meant to be seen??? But I'd still expect consistent tolerances from a common manufacturing process.
Maybe it's because the innards of an iPhone aren't meant to be seen??? But I'd still expect consistent tolerances from a common manufacturing process.
Your the first person I have heard say the material choices on the RAZR feel Tacky and cheap. Most people actually said the build quality and feel is one of the best on the market. Also its thickest point is still thinner than the iphone4's. And it actually has a higher average user rating on phone arena as well.I don't think he meant that he wouldn't like a battery that last a long time. I mean, heck, I'd like a phone that never needs charging! But the point is that, with the Razr Maxx, you're sacrificing size and weight for a long battery life. Granted, it's a hair thinner than the iPhone 4S at the thinnest point but it's a darn site wider and taller and made of tacky plastic in place of metal and glass - even with those lighter materials it's still heavier.
It's an ugly, bulky design with a huge battery shoved into it. If the huge battery is your thing then that's cool. Each to their own. I wouldn't be seen dead with one! I'm too stylish
http://www.phonearena.com/phones/compare/Motorola-DROID-RAZR-MAXX,Apple-iPhone-4S/phones/6644,5257
Last edited:
the full breakdown includes speculation that this case is machined from steel, not aluminium. Steel is significantly harder. Maybe it's not so easy to get a clean finish when you're machining from steel as it is from aluminium?
----------
Each to their own.
This model revamp is going down as the worst kept secret in iPhone history, even more than the one that was stolen from the bar (iPhone 4), and possible in Apple history.
It would be cool if these leaks turned out to completely be a diversion by Apple, but I highly doubt it. Still looks sharper than anything else I've seen out there IMHO.
It would be cool if these leaks turned out to completely be a diversion by Apple, but I highly doubt it. Still looks sharper than anything else I've seen out there IMHO.
The benefit of a tapered design is two-fold. First, It sits in your palm better without having to constantly squeeze your fingers on the edge. Second, it's easier to pick up when it's sitting on a table or other surface. I thought the 3G/GS design was superior in function while I find the 4/4S design superior in form.
I think this is why most everyone uses a case with the 4/4S. And I'm not even talking about protection for the fragile glass on the back.
I'm not shocked that we find more members here now saying they "like" the design. Bottom line is, it's why Apple die hards are so widely referred to as sheep. When the leaks were just early rumors, the so called loyalists spoke their mind and said "Yuk!" But now as it gets closer to show time, and the leaks become more detailed and consistent, the loyalists are now realizing, this may indeed be the next iPhone. Now they obviously can't be seen bashing their religion, so they now have come to the conclusion that it is indeed a nice design, and it has somehow "grown on them." These same blind followers feel a few hours with any other phone is enough time to judge and conclude these other phones as crap; yet somehow these same people find an endless amount of time for their upcoming iDevice (they have never held) to "grow on them." It's laughable when people don't see their own blind loyalty.
People nothing wrong with blind loyalty when you admit it.
People nothing wrong with blind loyalty when you admit it.
Unless you have your entire palm cupping the phone you still need to grip the edges and if you're doing that with the 3GS you're gripping very thin edges. It's swings and roundabouts. Same goes for picking it up from a table - the flat edges of the 4 allow you to grip it while also allowing it to lie flat and not rock or move if you touch the screen while it's resting.
I see a lot of people not using cases with the 4 and 4S. As for "fragile" glass, well, if you're dropping your handheld computer that's probably not a good idea whatever it's made from!
A last point - form and function are not two separate things that can be weighed up. One follows the other. They are two sides of the same coin. You're talking about what something looks like - that's not it's form. In good design, form and function are the same thing.
1.) are most people leaning towards the black or white based on current images? ( if you simply intend to respond with how you dont like the design just dont)
2.) Whats the deal with all the Safari is snappier on this form factor? Surely its some joke im just curious as to its origins.
3.) what ever happened to the Vote a post down feature? Did things get so out of hand with that it necessitated removing the feature altogether?
Was this a mockup based on the leaked info or was this an actual leak do you know? Cos i do like that better than the blue greymetal
I'm not shocked that we find more members here now saying they "like" the design. Bottom line is, it's why Apple die hards are so widely referred to as sheep. When the leaks were just early rumors, the so called loyalists spoke their mind and said "Yuk!" But now as it gets closer to show time, and the leaks become more detailed and consistent, the loyalists are now realizing, this may indeed be the next iPhone. Now they obviously can't be seen bashing their religion, so they now have come to the conclusion that it is indeed a nice design, and it has somehow "grown on them." These same blind followers feel a few hours with any other phone is enough time to judge and conclude these other phones as crap; yet somehow these same people find an endless amount of time for their upcoming iDevice (they have never held) to "grow on them." It's laughable when people don't see their own blind loyalty.
People nothing wrong with blind loyalty when you admit it.
There is a fine line between blind (and misplaced) loyalty and learning to better appreciate and accept an engineering masterpiece for what it is.
The fact remains that many of us are not engineering experts. I am not embarrassed to admit that when the design was first revealed, I found it fugly (and to some extent, I still do). However, that was also because we did not understand the rationale behind those design decisions. Just look at the people who flocked to the S3 just because it boasts a larger, brighter screen. I guess we humans are superficial in that aspect.
If what Lehman says is indeed true, then there really is a method to Apple's apparent madness. Every step they have made in designing the new iphone is a carefully calculated step to make it as functional and practical as possible. These are features which I feel are every bit as important in a phone, yet they may not be readily apparent (like you can tell how durable a phone is just by looking at it?).
They are nowhere close to scrapping the bottom of the barrel for new ideas; they have a good reason for not wanting the screen to be more than 4 inches and so on. I still find it fugly, but at the same time, this newfound insight allows me to better appreciate the effort that has gone into crafting the next gen iphone.
1) I genuinely don't know yet but I usually go for black because it makes the front face look cleaner. They both look pretty cool. The treatment the steel is getting to make it look darker has a really sci-fi edge to it.
2) I think it's a joke. Origins being that whenever there is a software update on an Apple machine people always say that Safari feels snappier. It's a meme.
3) I don't know. I guess they wanted to stop people constantly down voting in herds. I don't mind it. What I would like is a quicker ignore button. That way it's easier to block out the trolls. I find I'm using it more and more these days.
You are trying to deny the obvious. Tapered shape is much more convenient. And I can easily prove it. New design will be much slimmer. Let's crank it up a notch. Lets take an example of a coin with flat edges. How do you like picking this one up from a table? With flat edges one needs to squeeze phone sides very hard to create enough friction. With tapered shape you can slide you fingers under the phone (or press on one phone side to make the opposite side pop).
Last edited:
Lehmann post is referring to or inferring quite a bit of mis-information about the iPhone structure. First, my understanding is that the iPhone 4S steel band is actually 3 piece: the top, bottom + right, and left. Also, It was never acknowledged that the wifi, blutooth, gps antenna's are now inside the phone, so...that means the left side of the band is for these antennas.
Lehmann's point about this being a 'unibody' design is misplaced. The new design seems as unibody as the 4S design is. The only difference is that in the new iphone the unibody structure runs through the back instead of running through the middle of the phone in the case of the 4S.
Lehmann's point about this being a 'unibody' design is misplaced. The new design seems as unibody as the 4S design is. The only difference is that in the new iphone the unibody structure runs through the back instead of running through the middle of the phone in the case of the 4S.
Not to mention, someone with some actual background and education in ID.
non-Engineers talking about engineering
It's not unlike the non-photographers babbling about the camera ("Hey man, mega-pixels don't mean anything...")Like the new Porsche 991 platform. Superior engineering, looks longer, has a longer wheel base, improvements in weight, HP, handing dynamics, etc., yet is just an evolution of the outstanding 997 platform.
