Want it to be nonexclusive? Export to PDF. Want it to have all the bells and whistles, animations AND a platform-agnostic experience for interactivity? Don't expect Apple to subsidize FREE software to allow you to create such things. Go to Adobe, spend hundreds of dollars of your money on their products, and then sell your wares elsewhere.
Why not? Sure they can do whatever they want. They could license the format.
Why so angry and defensive about my commentary. Yesterdays heart-tugging presentation was all about learning and "think of the children" - Apple must REALLY care about education. Oh wait - you agree - this is BUSINESS. So who cares about accessibility. Let's just make sure Apple makes a tidy profit.
I'm not against Apple making a profit or keeping exclusivity - they have every right. I just don't think that's a winning formula in this market.
And one of the driving forces behind Apple's initiative here is because they had no chance of ever competing with Amazon for books. They tried - but because their iBook format is restrictive (by device) - they will never have the sales that Amazon has where people can choose what device to read on.
So how do they make their iBook format "better" and more profitable? See yesterday's keynote.
I don't begrudge them for it. Smart BUSINESS. I just don't think it's smart education.