A11 Bionic Chip in iPhone 8 and iPhone X on Par With 13-Inch MacBook Pro, Outperforms iPad Pro

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Sep 13, 2017.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    The iPhone 8, 8 Plus, and X are equipped with a six-core A11 chip, which Apple says brings some major improvements over the A10 chip in the iPhone 7. The chip features two performance cores and four efficiency cores.

    Early Geekbench scores for iPhone X and iPhone 8 devices suggest that not only does the new A11 significantly outperform the A10, it beats the A10X Fusion in the iPad Pro and it is on par with the chips in Apple's latest 13-inch MacBook Pro models.

    [​IMG]

    In 12 Geekbench scans, the A11 chip saw an average single-core score of 4169, and an average multi-core score of 9836. Some individual scores were much higher, though, with single-core scores topping out at 4274 and multi-core scores at 10438.

    [​IMG]
    A single A11 Geekbench score

    Comparatively, the 10.5-inch iPad Pro with A10 Fusion chip has an average Geekbench single-core score of 3887 and a multi-core score of 9210. Apple's highest-end dual-core 3.5GHz 13-inch 2017 MacBook Pro has a single-core score of 4592 and a multi-core score of 9602, suggesting the A11 outperforms it on multi-core tasks and comes close on single-core tasks.

    [​IMG]
    Geekbench average for 10.5-inch iPad Pro with A10X Fusion​

    Performance is even better stacked up against the lower-end 2017 MacBook Pro models. The 2.3GHz machine has scores of 4321/9183 and the 3.1GHz machine has scores of 4227/8955.

    [​IMG]
    Average Geekbench score for high-end 3.5GHz 13-inch MacBook Pro​

    On paper, the iPhone X and iPhone 8 Plus will offer significantly better performance than the iPhone 7. The iPhone 7 has an average single-core Geekbench score of 3327 and a multi-core score of 5542.

    [​IMG]
    Average Geekbench score for iPhone 7 with A10 Fusion chip​

    According to Apple, the performance cores in the A11 chip are 25 percent faster than the A10 chip, while the efficiency cores are 70 percent faster than the A10 chip. The A11 chip is better at multi-threaded tasks because a second-generation performance controller is able to harness all six of the cores simultaneously.

    MacRumors spoke to Geekbench's John Poole, who said he believes the A11 benchmarks are real. Poole believes the two high performance cores in the A11 are running at 2.5GHz, up from 2.34GHz in the A10. The 24MHz reading is an anomaly.

    Though the iPhone X and the iPhone 8 offer impressive Geekbench scores, how that translates to real world performance remains to be seen. According to analyst Dan Matte, IPC (instructions per cycle) improvements are "relatively modest" and Geekbench scores should be ignored.
    The iPhone 8, 8 Plus, and iPhone X all adopt the A11 chip, so with the iPhone 8 models set to launch next week, the improvements introduced in the A11 will become more clear.

    Article Link: A11 Bionic Chip in iPhone 8 and iPhone X on Par With 13-Inch MacBook Pro, Outperforms iPad Pro
     
  2. Appleaker, Sep 13, 2017
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2017

    Appleaker macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2016
    #2
    Well that won’t be the case next year with the quad-core 13” MacBook Pros. But impressive nonetheless.
    As for outperforming the A10X, that’s good but not so good that a 3 month old ‘PC replacement’ is outperformed by a phone by the same company, however it was to be expected.
    If they’re going to release the iPads so close to the iPhone then they should include the next generation processor in it first like they used to do.
     
  3. imran5720 macrumors regular

    imran5720

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2013
  4. bkends35 macrumors 6502a

    bkends35

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2013
    Location:
    USA
  5. Avenged110 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2010
  6. atlchamp macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2012
    Location:
    ATL
    #6
    They totally missed the fact that its running iOS 11.1 haha
     
  7. imran5720 macrumors regular

    imran5720

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2013
    #7
    So it really smoked all android devices out there, poor Samsung
     
  8. Delgibbons macrumors regular

    Delgibbons

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2016
    Location:
    London
    #8
    Can it run Cubase Pro or Protools with VSL? No. No it can't.

    Benchmarks schmenchmarks.
     
  9. L-Viz macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2017
    #9
    It is called bionic, cause there are actual human brain cells implemented into the chip. Mostly missing Foxconn workers.
     
  10. iBluetooth macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2016
    #10
    That's impressive performance and matching a laptop!
     
  11. ruchern macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2017
    Location:
    Singapore
    #11
    Running iOS 11.1 already? That's fast. Hints to October event?
     
  12. a.gomez, Sep 13, 2017
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2017

    a.gomez macrumors 6502a

    a.gomez

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    #12
    I just cant get over the name f this chip... It is something a 12 year old would come up with for their comic or something from some random SyFy channel show.

    Anyway, it is tied to iOS... So as useless for anything real as the iPad Pro has been.
     
  13. jdillings macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2015
    #13
    Yeah but unlike the iPhone, the MacBook can actually be used to get work done.
     
  14. thadoggfather Suspended

    thadoggfather

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2007
    #14
    The A-series chip team at Apple gets an A++ from me.

    But these are just benchmarks, its still hindered by being same old vanilla iOS...

    When will there be A-series MBP's, with exceptional battery and fanless?
     
  15. Avieshek Suspended

    Avieshek

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2013
    Location:
    India
  16. power2b macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2017
    #16
    All this power of the iPhone X could be used for super features on iOS but nope they instead use it for creating Animoji.

    #killme
     
  17. iapplelove macrumors 68040

    iapplelove

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2011
    Location:
    East Coast USA
  18. Rob_2811 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2016
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #18
    Great does that mean I can do software development on an iPhone now?!

    Of course not because these cross architecture benchmark comparisons are utterly pointless..
     
  19. lunarworks macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    #19
    So they actually did remove 32-bit support from the A11?

    When Apple drops legacy stuff, they drop it hard.
     
  20. Internaut macrumors 6502a

    #20
    Sounds like Apple are dangerously close, hardware wise, to being able to launch a none Intel MacBook.
     
  21. Rob_2811 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2016
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #22
    Why not? Might aswell kill the platform for pro users completely...
     
  22. mac.cali macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2012
    #23
    Its a matter of time till Apple uses their own chips inside it's MacBook.
     
  23. Rocketman macrumors 603

    Rocketman

    #24
    Rather than expecting an Intel killer, I expect a dual A12 phone. I wonder how long till Apple deprecates the laptop and sticks with an iPhone as a headless mode device airplay to a 4K TV, wireless headphone and keyboard. We are right there now.
     
  24. roeiz macrumors 6502a

    roeiz

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2010
    #25
    you poor soul...
     

Share This Page