Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It will be 80% steadicam shots of Steve running around giving orders.



Plagiarism?

What are you talking about? Why would he steal exact lines from previous works as opposed to making a new story?

Maybe the scenes will be zippy and fast paced like before but why actual words?
Watch and learn -- Sorkin reuses dialogue ALL THE TIME.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S78RzZr3IwI
 
Not optimistic on this, but ....

At the same time? I think most of us know PLENTY about Jobs' achievements in the computing world. (Those who still have no clue are the ones willfully ignoring "tech history" due to a lack of interest in it, so can't see how many would be the target audience for yet another Jobs-centric movie anyway?)

The part most of us really don't know much about is Steve's family and personal life. This might actually be THE place to make a good movie story out of his life .... Focus on the part of the story that hasn't been told yet.
 
Based on the quotes in the story, it seems like the character of Lisa isn't so much the heroine in the actual movie, but that the person, Lisa Jobs played a major role in getting the production of the film headed in a good direction.

I was worried for a moment.

You know, for as much flak as the Ashton Kutcher version Steve's story gets here on MacRumors, I actually enjoyed the film. I own the Issacson biography and found the movie to be very entertaining.

I love Sorkin's work (especially Sports Night and The Newsroom) and hope that it will focus more on accuracy and entertainment and not too much on pithy dialogue. I am a little worried about it "Only revolving around the three events", but I bet Sorkin will pull off something just as entertaining.

What's the over/under on how many moving Steadicam shots the film uses?


The whole movie will probably be shot with Steadicams.
 
Sorkin also reveals in the new interview that the character of Jobs' daughter Lisa will play a major role as the "heroine" of the film.

So in "real life" Lisa played almost no role in Jobs' life during his/Apple's formative years, aside from the fact he name a failed computer after her. So she is going to play a major role in shaping Jobs' life in the movie?

To say no role is too much, I mean they released The Lisa as a computer.... Have you even read the book?!?! Emotionally, it took a toll on him. She was very important to his story and the person he is... I mean he rejected his own daughter?
 
Any word on Laurene Powell Jobs contributing to this?

----------

The whole movie will probably be shot with Steadicams.

That is a damn good idea.

One I heard kicked around was a "Forrest Gump" style of movie. The whole Apple story is seen through the eyes of one long-term Apple employee hired right around the launch of the Apple ][.

He just keeps on doing non-management jobs keeping the place together. Many felt he should be that prototype tech that had every major product Apple shipped first handled on his HP surplus electronic bench. One piece of drama comes about when a few want to get rid of his "old bench" for new equipment but it is kept for sentimental and symbolic reasons. He has no real ego but a lot of common sense keeps him around while sitting on stock options and his Cupertino tract home while the community grows in wealth around him.

He knows more people in the place than any executive as the place is fought over. Since he has been there for so long, he gets the ear of many executives as they come. He's also one of the first people Steve Jobs talks to while returning to Apple.

Love to see either of these made.
 
Last edited:
Watch and learn -- Sorkin reuses dialogue ALL THE TIME.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S78RzZr3IwI

I see...

well I forgive the Sport Night ones for sure (which were involved in the majority of the duplicates) because that show was ahead of its time, cancelled pre-mature, and was unwatched and unknown by most people even though it was pure genius.

Its almost like the dialogue from the his golden era deserved to be re-hashed now that his stuff is more appreciated.

Im not mad at that, thats just how the work goes.

I wasn't aware of that expose tho lol. Pretty funny.
 
It will be 80% steadicam shots of Steve running around giving orders.

One of the best Steve Jobs stories I know comes from a MacWorld keynote where some of the timing did not go as planned but it didn't break the audience. The biggest flub came about from a third party software exec demo-ing on stage to not exactly the planned script.

Backstage, Steve was pissed and did his usual verbal assault on the guy. As Steve Jobs was walking away, this third party software exec screamed to him, "You're beautiful when you're angry!"

Many backstage said it is the only time they ever heard Steve Jobs laugh.
 
One of the best Steve Jobs stories I know comes from a MacWorld keynote where some of the timing did not go as planned but it didn't break the audience. The biggest flub came about from a third party software exec demo-ing on stage to not exactly the planned script.

Backstage, Steve was pissed and did his usual verbal assault on the guy. As Steve Jobs was walking away, this third party software exec screamed to him, "You're beautiful when your are angry!"

Many backstage said it is the only time they ever heard Steve Jobs laugh.

Epic.

See this is the type of stuff I would want to explore. The get-****-done-at-all-costs-Steve, the psycho-ness that is excused by immense success. The success almost being due to it.

And the lessons we learn from that and how it influences our own choices in life that we might relate to.
 
Geez...Negativity anyone? Will this movie perfectly explore the life of Steve Jobs in it's entirety? NO... Will it get every single nuance right without the slightest falter? NO... Will it be an exact rendering of his psychological profile? NO...
Will it be a well made movie with something valid to say? YES. Will millions of people watch this movie and enjoy it? YES...Naysayers begone. ;)
 
Watch and learn -- Sorkin reuses dialogue ALL THE TIME.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S78RzZr3IwI
So he uses his own bits where they make sense in different stories that he writes. A lot of writers and artists have their own style and particulars that are present across a lot of their work. In this case it's a bit more in your face in a sense but it's still pat of all that. And not sure how using your own words and dialog particulars in various places is plagiarism since it's your own work to begin with. Some might say it's not as creative perhaps, but that's still fairly subjective and certainly doesn't mean that something is being stolen from somewhere.

----------

Is anyone actually interested in this?

anyone else not care much for another jobs movie at this point?
Plenty of people are interested. While plenty of others might not be. Just like many other things in life.

----------

Haven't we already had a lame movie about Jobs?

Yes Steve Jobs turned Apple around and led the creation of some very cool consumer products. But lets get real, these products have a shelf life of a couple years, are made by exploited workers China, not upgradable, overprice, and Apple hoards its profits overseas to avoid paying taxes. At the same time Jobs, while driven, was not a very good person and by many accounts a complete *******.

Unless you load in a whole bunch of fictional content, there isn't much meat for an interesting plot.
Sounds like a lot of his life story is being ignored or overlooked in that diatribe.

----------

And a lot of folks panned it as boring.
But the vast majority didn't.
 
No idea why Leonardo was ever considered.

Bale would have been perfect.

Fassbender... He MAY be able to pull it off.
 
What's that? Movie makers are still trying to cash in on Steve Jobs' death? Give it up you dumb, unimaginative, talentless losers, just give it up.
Plenty of movies made about people who are dead or alive. Many of them are interesting and even successful. And the problem with any of that is what again?
 
I think the movie would be better with an obscure actor playing Jobs. Obviously a good one, but one that looks like him and one that is unknown (for the most part). Leonardo or Bale would be too much IMO. I mean hell, why not George Clooney. Their obviously looking for big names. Hopefully they will find someone who is less known.
 
I think the movie would be better with an obscure actor playing Jobs. Obviously a good one, but one that looks like him and one that is unknown (for the most part). Leonardo or Bale would be too much IMO. I mean hell, why not George Clooney. Their obviously looking for big names. Hopefully they will find someone who is less known.

Agree, there are plenty of actors where this role can be their bus out.

----------

I thought that successful coders strive to maximize code reuse all the time!

----------



If this movie is successful, it will spawn a trilogy with sequel and either prequel or midquel.

I keep on thinking why are they doing it as a traditional film release? I can easily see this being a web-series.
 
Wow. His daughter is the hero in the movie. Yeah just another female piggybacking movie. Welcome to America.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.