Watch and learn -- Sorkin reuses dialogue ALL THE TIME.It will be 80% steadicam shots of Steve running around giving orders.
Plagiarism?
What are you talking about? Why would he steal exact lines from previous works as opposed to making a new story?
Maybe the scenes will be zippy and fast paced like before but why actual words?
Based on the quotes in the story, it seems like the character of Lisa isn't so much the heroine in the actual movie, but that the person, Lisa Jobs played a major role in getting the production of the film headed in a good direction.
I was worried for a moment.
You know, for as much flak as the Ashton Kutcher version Steve's story gets here on MacRumors, I actually enjoyed the film. I own the Issacson biography and found the movie to be very entertaining.
I love Sorkin's work (especially Sports Night and The Newsroom) and hope that it will focus more on accuracy and entertainment and not too much on pithy dialogue. I am a little worried about it "Only revolving around the three events", but I bet Sorkin will pull off something just as entertaining.
What's the over/under on how many moving Steadicam shots the film uses?
Sorkin also reveals in the new interview that the character of Jobs' daughter Lisa will play a major role as the "heroine" of the film.
So in "real life" Lisa played almost no role in Jobs' life during his/Apple's formative years, aside from the fact he name a failed computer after her. So she is going to play a major role in shaping Jobs' life in the movie?
The whole movie will probably be shot with Steadicams.
It will be 80% steadicam shots of Steve running around giving orders.
One of the best Steve Jobs stories I know comes from a MacWorld keynote where some of the timing did not go as planned but it didn't break the audience. The biggest flub came about from a third party software exec demo-ing on stage to not exactly the planned script.
Backstage, Steve was pissed and did his usual verbal assault on the guy. As Steve Jobs was walking away, this third party software exec screamed to him, "You're beautiful when your are angry!"
Many backstage said it is the only time they ever heard Steve Jobs laugh.
So he uses his own bits where they make sense in different stories that he writes. A lot of writers and artists have their own style and particulars that are present across a lot of their work. In this case it's a bit more in your face in a sense but it's still pat of all that. And not sure how using your own words and dialog particulars in various places is plagiarism since it's your own work to begin with. Some might say it's not as creative perhaps, but that's still fairly subjective and certainly doesn't mean that something is being stolen from somewhere.
Is anyone actually interested in this?
Plenty of people are interested. While plenty of others might not be. Just like many other things in life.anyone else not care much for another jobs movie at this point?
Sounds like a lot of his life story is being ignored or overlooked in that diatribe.Haven't we already had a lame movie about Jobs?
Yes Steve Jobs turned Apple around and led the creation of some very cool consumer products. But lets get real, these products have a shelf life of a couple years, are made by exploited workers China, not upgradable, overprice, and Apple hoards its profits overseas to avoid paying taxes. At the same time Jobs, while driven, was not a very good person and by many accounts a complete *******.
Unless you load in a whole bunch of fictional content, there isn't much meat for an interesting plot.
But the vast majority didn't.And a lot of folks panned it as boring.
Plenty of movies made about people who are dead or alive. Many of them are interesting and even successful. And the problem with any of that is what again?What's that? Movie makers are still trying to cash in on Steve Jobs' death? Give it up you dumb, unimaginative, talentless losers, just give it up.
The film should really have the iPhone launch.
I think the movie would be better with an obscure actor playing Jobs. Obviously a good one, but one that looks like him and one that is unknown (for the most part). Leonardo or Bale would be too much IMO. I mean hell, why not George Clooney. Their obviously looking for big names. Hopefully they will find someone who is less known.
I thought that successful coders strive to maximize code reuse all the time!
----------
If this movie is successful, it will spawn a trilogy with sequel and either prequel or midquel.
hollywoodrumors.com
Because there have been a lot of garbage movies about him and we know this one will be?Let the man rest in peace. Enough with these garbage movies.
Seems like you could care less.I do not care about this movie.