Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I agree it is ridiculous, but all this means is Apple doesn't get my cash. I have other resources, physical CDs if I like the album enough and Amazon.com.

LOL, we'll see how long Amazon keeps those prices, it's either they are selling them for a loss or the labels are behind it, we'll see.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5H11 Safari/525.20)

Glad I bought some music last night... The price of it went up! Interestingly, album prices have not necessarily increased even where the price of all of the tracks has.
 
Well, this isn't exactly the best way to go about cutting down on P2P sharing :rolleyes:

Quite frankly music should've been offered (not solely so of course) DRM-Free and in Apple Lossless right from the start. For the same price as the current album price.

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5H11 Safari/525.20)

Glad I bought some music last night... The price of it went up! Interestingly, album prices have not necessarily increased even where the price of all of the tracks has.

If I were to have a guess, i'd say this pricing structure is to get more people to buy albums again. The music industry probably lost quite a bit of money when people could just buy the two or three tracks they liked from an album instead of the whole thing.
 
Why the heck are really old songs also $1.29?

I just checked some of my personal favorites, like Bon Jovi's Living on a Prayer.. yep, $1.29.

Shouldn't they make the newer, rabidly popular stuff $1.29 so they can make extra money, and give us a break on the classics?

This new pricing is screwed up. I just started buying from iTunes again, looks like I'll be returning to Amazon.

Idiots...
 
Suddenly...

And suddenly I am switching to Amazon for all of my music purchases. Oh well iTunes had a good run. On a side note this also means that you are getting less bang for your buck with the iTunes gift cards so I really hope my friends don't give me anymore of those lol
 
To be honest, I've never purchased a song on iTunes. I go Amazon only. iTunes is great for browsing around, but then I go to Amazon when I actually want to buy the song.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5H11 Safari/525.20)

I never thought I'd say this, but I'll now be comparison shopping at amazon. I love the ease of use and layout of the itms, but amazon will now be half the price in some cases.
 
Never purchased off iTunes and don't think they are making it attractive for me to start - 'random price fixing'.. "oh look heres a popular song.. lets make that one more..."
 
I always wondered why people buy seasonal singles. I mean, you can just switch on the radio and it's currently playing on one of the top 40 stations. I get tired of new pop songs very quickly, especially since most of them are very repetitive in themselves. It would never occur to me to buy it, maybe after a few years for nostalgic reasons.

So now the new "hot" singles are more expensive on iTunes, so less people will buy them. They might buy two indie-label songs instead. I believe this will hurt the major labels because their top singles will find fewer buyers and good singles from smaller labels will go up in the charts.

I'm currently working on producing music from some good local bands here and putting the results up online. I like being able to choose my price point and keep it low for low-budget productions to get a band started.
 
I was really hoping (despite the record of the music companies) that variable pricing wasn't "Majority of songs cost more and few songs no one cares about cost less".

Way to go music companies! May you reap what you sow.

I also realize this is nothing more than a shallow tactic to discourage single sales and prop up album sales (since they hate single sales).
 
The iTunes store does not offer plus status to all the music in its library yet, does it?

Virtually everything, if not now everything, in my shopping cart is plus. They've been getting that way over the last couple of months. I thought it was all supposed to be DRM free by the time variable pricing rolled out.
 
What really pisses me off is that it seems like they just picked random songs and albums to increase. I bet all the record company execs were meeting to discuss the best selling and most popular songs and albums from the last 2 years and then sent the list to Apple.

Or maybe it's random because the record cos. have no idea how things will sell at different prices, so they're going to test out different prices for different song categories (new hits, old hits, old b-sides, new b-sides, album filler, etc.)
 
if it were supply and demand economics, wouldn't the most popular songs be the cheapest?

No--if the demand is higher, then the price should be higher, other things equal. But . . .

"True to supply-and-demand economics..."
well, if a song was a scarce fully un-replicable resource, then yes, there would be a demand supply theory, however, since the song has already been produced, the supply is perfectly elastic. It's just money, no theories.

While supply is unlimited, record cos. may have different pricing incentives for different songs. For example, they may want to price new hits low to drive sales (as they do now with new CD releases, which are typically the lowest price you'll get on the CD until it hits the discount rack). And they may charge high prices for back-catalog songs since the people buying them really want the song and no one else is going to buy it just because it's low-priced.
 
I buy most of my music on itunes, and have done that for about 4 years (I think). And I can count on one hand the number of single songs i've bought. i know i'm the minority, but i still like having the album. I'm glad that itunes has basically kept album pricing the same. most still cost $9.99, and I'm happy about that. So, be like me. Buy the album. Listen to the whole thing!
 
Why the heck are really old songs also $1.29?

I just checked some of my personal favorites, like Bon Jovi's Living on a Prayer.. yep, $1.29.

Because if you really want that song you're going to pay for it. If you're just flipping around, what are the chances you're going to buy it because the price is low? Everyone has heard it so it's not like you'll give it a try for 69c . . .
 
All music in iTunes is now 100% DRM free (see attachment).

iTunes is still higher quality than Amazon (AAC > MP3).

30c increase in 6 years, and most is the same or cheaper? Get a grip will you.

Go to Amazon, thats exactly what the music industry want, they are sick of Apple bossing them around. iTunes marketshare wont budge more than a few percent though.
 

Attachments

  • Picture 14.jpg
    Picture 14.jpg
    592.1 KB · Views: 161
Get over variable pricing folks. Only bad things will happen if we let Steve Jobs determine the price of everything! :eek:
 
All music in iTunes is now 100% DRM free (see attachment).

And yet I still have songs that cannot be upgraded. As far as my searching has found so far, "DRM-free" means they've pulled anything from the store that couldn't be upgraded. :mad:

Edit: OK, I found one song that's still protected in my library that's still available in the store. But it's iTunes Plus in the store and yet I can't upgrade.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.