The real deal with Apple and Flash
Apple views Flash as a proprietary technology that is not an open web standard. You can replicate Flash functionality with a native JavaScript engine (SquirrelFish/V8/TraceMonkey/etc), SVG, and HTML5 standard Audio / Video tags. Apple believes that by investing heavily in these things (as they're obviously doing if you track WebKit closely) they can unlock the Web from Flash's proprietary grip. I, personally, hope they and Mozilla succeed in that endeavor.
Now the real debate is whether Apple should "temporarily" support Flash since there is no common alternative presently- but they view such support as opposite to their end goal of promoting the open web standards. You can make the argument both sides there, but there's no question the web will be a better place without being locked into Adobe's Flash...
Apple views Flash as a proprietary technology that is not an open web standard. You can replicate Flash functionality with a native JavaScript engine (SquirrelFish/V8/TraceMonkey/etc), SVG, and HTML5 standard Audio / Video tags. Apple believes that by investing heavily in these things (as they're obviously doing if you track WebKit closely) they can unlock the Web from Flash's proprietary grip. I, personally, hope they and Mozilla succeed in that endeavor.
Now the real debate is whether Apple should "temporarily" support Flash since there is no common alternative presently- but they view such support as opposite to their end goal of promoting the open web standards. You can make the argument both sides there, but there's no question the web will be a better place without being locked into Adobe's Flash...