Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Remember when people called Apple stupid for not supporting flash?

Now think about when people are going to call Apple stupid for removing the lightning port.
Despite the current mob of indignant port adherents, in 10 years most people are going to think that it was always obvious that the evolution of smartphones was leading to a portless design.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AF_APPLETALK
The lesson that Apple keeps teaching, and which others keep ignoring, is that to bring about meaningful change, you have to be bold and unapologetic in forcing about the change you want to see.

What will be next, I wonder.
Well said Sir, well said.
 
Flash should be remembered by all PC users as a monumental step in showing us what web browsers should be capable of in the 2000s.

It should be remembered by Mac users as Apple not wanting them enjoy the , then best, the web had to offer in those days as it has no vested interest in making the plug-in anything but buggy as hell.

Remember that Flash allowed developers to write once and deploy everywhere in 2007, truly ubiquitous. This made it very cheap but was ultimately its downfall as newbies with weak skills could easily deploy badly written apps.

Indeed there are still many things that HTML cannot do easily. Well done for all you inspired Flash, Sleep well.
 
If only websites stopped using it. I stopped using Flash a while ago and yet I have visited so many websites (e.g. banks, car sites) that need Flash, so I just end up leaving.
Yeah, you know something is up with a product when literally for years Adobe has provided conversion support from their own product to HTML 5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mazz0
People keep saying that companies will still use Flash; there’s no alternative/it’s too hard to use the alternative. I haven’t tried them, but I remember reading a while ago that Adobe’s Flash authoring tools could simply compile to HTML 5 (and presumably some JS) instead - is that wrong?

Yeah, you know something is up with a product when literally for years Adobe has provided conversion support from their own product to HTML 5.
Ninjad!
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
The quasi-government agency known as Adobe will have to tweak the settings on its other data collection apps, but outside of that the loss of Flash is no big deal for them.
 
Remember when people called Apple stupid for not supporting flash?

Now think about when people are going to call Apple stupid for removing the lightning port.

Crap software vs useful charging, syncing and diagnostic port. Apples and oranges.

But sure, Apple is always right.
 
The lightning port should have never existed to begin with. It was like the 2012 version of ADC.

More like a 2012 version of the iPod dock connector- but I agree - had the industry pulled USB-c out of their pockets earlier, this might have ended differently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AF_APPLETALK
Why what? Are you saying no one is going to call Apple stupid for doing so? Look at some Reddit threads. People are complaining their car doesn't have wireless carplay and lightning is the only way to do it. They even complained that they don't want to deal with adapters.

People will call Apple stupid for getting rid of lightning. No doubt.
Some will. But lightning is already heavily disliked for being proprietary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AF_APPLETALK
There's still no good alternative to Flash for games or other static interactive content.
HTML5 can do a lot of that, if programmers want to learn how to implement it. But because HTML5 is an open standard, there can be cross-compatibility challenges. When Google decided to fork Webkit with Chrome, that created some problems. But generally HTML5 has proved to be pretty robust. When I taught game design, my classes used Hype to create some really interesting 2D games in HTML5. After years of teaching Flash, I don't miss it at all. Its best years were with Macromedia. Adobe IMO really screwed it up.
 
For most things, yes. There's still no good alternative to Flash for games or other static interactive content. I know that despite the EoL, I'm going to be taking language courses and corporate training that require Flash for years to come.

WebGL/WebGPU and the various web game engines that use them would like to have a word with you.

Web Games were killed by the App Stores, I think. It wasn’t Flash’s downfall, because vastly better alternatives exist within HTML 5, meaning zero plugins are required.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
Hey man, respect your elders.

DivX is a huge part of h.264; without DivX, none of any modern video encoding would be possible.

RealVideo was a PITA, but so was everything back then. They were WAY ahead of their time, and pretty much paved the way for modern interactive video content.

Silverlight .. idk never used it. :D

Flash, well, flash. It basically made web apps before there was even such a thing. Hugely innovative, basically facilitated the interactive apps and web we know today. But Adobe kept it around for way too long. Should have been obsoleted 10 years ago when Jobs wrote that letter.
Wasn't Silverlight necessary for Netflix in the past?
 
  • Like
Reactions: vjl323
Good riddance to Flash, RealPlayer, Divx, SilverLight, and all of the other crap codecs and plug-ins that made early multimedia such a catastrophe. Some of it may have been necessary, but in the end it seem to serve everyone except the end-user.
I hated RealPlayer with a passion! It never worked well on the Mac. And DivX was alright but it was a pain keeping the codec up to date.
 
I hated RealPlayer with a passion! It never worked well on the Mac. And DivX was alright but it was a pain keeping the codec up to date.
Hahahaha I had nearly forgotten RealPlayer. It was such a terrible app but there was always that random guy who would use RealPlayer files so you had to keep it installed for those rare cases. Good times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spock
There were plenty of people for whom Flash was their first development environment, so it's worth pouring one out.

But the writing was on the wall even before the writing was in the Apple ad -- it was a desktop environment that couldn't make the leap to mobile.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nightfury326
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.