Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is it really wise to put their entire data system under one roof? Apple's fate is one fire/earthquake/Godzilla-attack away from being eliminated in one take.
Don't they already have one of these in California? If so, make that TWO roofs.
 
mac app store will find its home in this center, of course.

and itunes.

and other things...
 
Why not just put a second floor? Wouldn't that be easier than extending it more?

Most likely not. The only way it would be "easier" is if they originally designed a way to support the loading of a second floor, also electrical, mechanical and plumbing too. I don't think it would be built on top.
 
The only threat the data center would face is the occasional Tornado which we do get a few of in the spring time.

Not quite.

http://www.fema.gov/news/event.fema?id=41
http://www.rti.org/page.cfm?objectid=CA3736FB-86CE-41EE-AFBA681035F4ADB3/

They can probably keep the place self-powered for a day, maybe two.... but they'd start loosing ability to keep it operating at full capacity if they can't get the outside juice turned back on inside that time. I'm sure they have their own substation so the wires coming in are bit more heavy duty than most neighborhoods.

While certainly alot less brown/red than the map of CA/NV , it isn't exactly zero in parts of NC either.

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/products/conterminous/2008/maps/ceus/sc/charleston.pga.jpg

(http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/products/conterminous/2008/maps/)
 
I assume if it's as successful as they hope they will build a 3rd/4th/5th in different parts of the country to reduce latency.

Plus they can wrangling even more tax breaks out of the local community. Oooo look we're poor you gotta give us tax breaks or we can't put a data center in your community.

But yes.. if there is a internation trunk line going out of the south toward South Amer and/or Africa it would make sense to put one there. As long as stick with US placement it isn't just intra-country latency trying to negate.
 
I live about 20 min south of where the data center is. We are too far inland for Hurricanes to be a concern, the weather is very calm here most of the time. The only threat the data center would face is the occasional Tornado which we do get a few of in the spring time.

I live about 20 minutes north of Charlotte and while hurricanes are certainly a rarity, they do occasionally make their way inland. Just think back to Hugo. One Hugo-sized storm would certainly cause problems, remember it just takes one disaster to cause a major problem.
 
The second phase of the datacenter was being scoped out quite a while back. AT&T just ran a dedicated fiber line across the street from my house that is headed directly to the facility. (from what I could gather from the techs burying the cable under people's driveways)

1. Upper tier certified data centers have multiple fiber lines coming in ( preferably from two different vendors ). That way when some Bubba takes a backhoe to some driveway and cuts the cable (didn't find out what was buried nearby ), that the center is still online ( but at reduced capacity.)
Construction folks shear off gas lines , fiber , etc. more often than some rare, extreme scale, natural disaster will swing through town.



2. It is extremely unlikely that Apple was going to "light up" that whole datacenter at once. Half of it was probably scheduled to remain empty for at least a couple years. You don't build this sized centers and then immediately fill them to the gills with equipment. There are likely subsections you can secure from the others and allow contractos in to flush out while keeping the active section(s) locked down.

Phase 2 could easily be lighting up another subsection that is inside of the current shell.
 
I don't doubt it but the photo shows what may be a parking lot

In other developments many companies are looking to build "green" data centers in Iceland where they use geothermal power and the climate doesn't require the power resources needed in hot California.
 
Looks like a lot of nice farmland around the data center. I wonder how the neighbors feel about it. The traffic down that road is going to increase dramatically.

Why? People dont have to DRIVE to the data center to get their itunes purchases...


Wont be more than maybe a hundred employees there at any given time.

Its notta walmart.
 
Don't they already have one of these in California? If so, make that TWO roofs.

Yes they do have one in CA. So they have already been operating in a mode where probably had a large 'fail-over" lease with a large disaster recovery company. This second center allows them to do some/most of that in house.

The only problem with the two is that they aren't the same size. At some point the NC center will have more stuff carrying more workload than the CA center can handle in addition to its normal load. There is a much more major risk that the CA center will get knocked out over next 10 years (a faultline that runs nearby the center is overdue for its every 100-120 year quake. ) . At that point the NC center will have to soak up the load for it.
That is one reason the NC center is so large. Not because of some 'new' workload, but to handle the current stuff in a disaster recovery situation.

Similarly, if Apple opens a third site then this center would be fail over site for both CA and that new one.
 
xServes?

From what I understand, NetApp is Apple's go to company for data storage. NetApp also builds the most efficient data centers in the world. I would be surprised if NetApp and Apple weren't working on this thing together.


Netapp builds...data centers?


Didnt see that on their parts list...what's one cost from netapp these days?
 
When is the last time you heard of any major natural disaster in NC? I'm quite sure it's far enough inland that hurricanes are not a major concern. And I think it's high enough that flooding is not an issue either.. Seems like the perfect place.

2012's just around the corner...
 
Wont be more than maybe a hundred employees there at any given time.

Not even a 100. Probably closer to 35-50. Perhaps more folks in two local elementary school classrooms.

The only time would rise in he 100 range was their was major equipment being remodeled/installed/ripped out in one of the subsections. So certainly more than were going to dairy farm that was on this plot before, but less than have been trotting through they during the peak construction phase.



What is not shown here , but was shown in earlier articles is that this is not too far off of a freeway. The plane is somewhat flying over freeway when taking these shots I think.
 
Is it really wise to put their entire data system under one roof? Apple's fate is one fire/earthquake/Godzilla-attack away from being eliminated in one take.

One cautious tale, were businesses that ran in one of the World Trade Center towers, keeping their backups in the other tower.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_0_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8A306 Safari/6531.22.7)

Can you imagine how many Xserves that place can hold? Apple has got to be their own best customer.

Haha! Apple using its own xserve and osx server at it new datacenter. love to see that day come.

if only Apple cared about is server products as much as the iPad.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.