Well the Samsung Galaxy buds don’t have active noise cancellation, so they’re really not the same features as AirPod Pro.Samsung galaxy buds come to mind at $129(cheaper from other retailers). There's others.
But we don't know if tens of millions are willing to pay the price. They haven't even shipped. And there's all kinds of sales on the existing airpods bringing their price down to more reasonable.
I think it's the same thing, yes. But I can see how some would separate the two.
I would say ANY buds priced over $200 are overpriced. No matter who makes them. There comes a point where it's just not worth it, I don't care how much they pack in to them.
Even the $199 airpods with wireless charging are too much. Luckily you can find them on sale for $150 which I feel is maybe more reasonable for those.
re: expensive vs. overpriced, there is a difference. Expensive is a neighborhood of $1,000,000 homes, that might take 4-6 weeks on the market before selling. Overpriced is the one listed for $1,100,000 that‘s been on the market for nine months and still hasn’t sold.
Things are worth what people are willing to pay. A $350,000 Ferrari is “worth it” if Ferrari is selling the quantity they expect to, at that price.
You might think any car over $50,000 is “overpriced”, but that’s not particularly relevant to Ferrari and the 3,000 buyers who bring them $1+ billion in revenue for that model.
Last edited: