Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm curious; why?

Modem + router combos are usually not very good at either of those tasks. You're much better off buying the best modem you can get, and the best router you can get.

Not only that, but if you have separate devices and new tech comes along in either, you can upgrade one without having to mess with the other. For example, I recently moved from a DOCSIS 2.0 cable modem to DOCSIS 3.0, and was able to simply swap out the cable modem without having to change anything else. Even my IP address remained the same because it depends on the router's MAC address.

Combo devices are just another example of "jack of all trades, master of none."
I have never, and I do mean never had trouble with any of the Netgear stuff I have owned. In all cases I had a modem/router which was;
  • One box, not two.
  • One less cable.
  • One less powerpoint needed.
  • Less power burned?
I take your point about replacing half the hardware inb case of failure but I think a combo is less money than two separate devices anyway.
 
My , how times have changed.

We used to proudly display our Apple stuff and logo

Now we want to make sure it's small enough to hide!

"Siri, where is my airport extreme?"

Siri: The next airport is 15 miles away, extreme weather forecasted!

Opens iTunes and plays: I'm all out of love" by air supply
Thanks. Now I have that song stuck in my head!
 
You get a ‘free' router whether you use it or not. I’ve not seen it as an additonal cost in the vast majority of cases.
Nope. The vast majority of ISP's have a "free" router with a $10/mo. lease or bill addition. You may not have to buy it, but you do have to rent it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ssgbryan
You get a ‘free' router whether you use it or not. I’ve not seen it as an additonal cost in the vast majority of cases.

For the entirety of my life, I've always had to pay a separate charge for a modem. And additional charge for a wireless router. I'm not sure what your context for vast majority is, but if it's just your experiences, then that's pretty very little. Comcast, Charter, and XFinity are services with large customer bases that charge separate fees, for example.
 
Last edited:
On a side note, those new Eero things available in the US look really cool and they seem to have some strong claims and even stronger reviews. Unfortunately only available in the US right now, do any of you guys have them? They seem like the answer to my WiFi related prayers.
 
You get a ‘free' router whether you use it or not. I’ve not seen it as an additonal cost in the vast majority of cases.
I pay one fee per month for internet, phone and cable, no additional fees at all; the router/modem is included in the base price, and they will not discount me of I chose to have my own cable modem. Two years ago, they were charging $6 per month, but with the new price structure, it is all for one price.
 
I was extremely surprised to see when I checked Airport Utility that it was a firmware update.

It had been so long since a firmware update was available, that when I saw the blinking yellow light I immediately assumed a hardware failure or anomalous double NAT message.
Thanks for this post. I saw the blinking light on my downstairs time capsule last night and rebooted it. Now I know I need to update the firmware on both of the time capsules.
 
I think they kept the form factor because of the antennas. I don't expect the next airport extreme to be any shorter.
 
I pay one fee per month for internet, phone and cable, no additional fees at all; the router/modem is included in the base price, and they will not discount me of I chose to have my own cable modem. Two years ago, they were charging $6 per month, but with the new price structure, it is all for one price.
I returned the Comcast modem and had the $10/month rental fee removed from my bill, no questions asked and they didn't even try to up-sell me on anything. You have to go to their "local" service center to return their modem, in my case it was only 1 county away, but they gladly took it back. Never, ever, call them to ask about anything. Their phone based support is only trained to increase your bill, the service center on the other hand has always been friendly and efficient other than their location.
 
Antennas are popular with consumers. They want Apple to sell something like this....
TP-LINK-AC1750-Wireless-Dual-Band-Gigabit-WiFi-Router-Six-Antenna-Dual-USB-DDP-Lsea-Center.jpg
[doublepost=1464367460][/doublepost]Shsht, don't let smacrumon see this.

He'll have a heart attack and let's not talk about anything with the word antenna in it!
 
Synology Router AC1900 is what I use now. Love it. Reliable, flexible, an App Store (though not much yet) and based on Synology's DSM OS which I love ..
 
Update: Apple may be complying with an FCC deadline of June 2, 2016 related to router software security rules gradually phased in since 2014, which would explain why the stock outage is limited to U.S. stores.(Thanks, Cole, Justin, and Corrode!)

I don't think this is the issue. All this FCC requirement does is require wireless router manufacturers to update to a firmware that prevents the installation of hacked firmware builds that enable either unauthorized channels, or power boosts to authorized channels. Apple has known this is coming for over two years now and they could have easily rolled that firmware into the production line for their wireless devices during that time period if this is the issue.

As I understand the FCC rule, I believe Apple's routers are already compliant with this requirement anyway. Apple's router firmware appears to be closed source and I have not seen any hacks to enable the issues the FCC rule addresses.

This FCC rule is IMO aimed more at routers that allow open source packages like some of the WRT variants to be installed on their routers. Asus just rolled out an update that will block variants of these packages that can access the relevant wireless settings.

There has been quite a bit of discussion on this topic on the Asus Merlin firmware threads on SmallNetBuilder the last couple months or so.
 
I wouldn't the airports to get Siri as Siri currently is. I would rather they just get rid of Siri and replace it with Google now
 
So I already own a time capsule, does that mean Apple will replace mine for free with a new one that does comply with new rulings? Or is this just selling the device and not for buyers?
 
So I already own a time capsule, does that mean Apple will replace mine for free with a new one that does comply with new rulings? Or is this just selling the device and not for buyers?
Click the "update" button on AirPort Utility and you are done.
 
The Time Capsule was abandoned and the team disbanded a couple years ago when it was decided that da cloud is where everyone wanted their data instead.
That makes no sense. A cloud backup only would take sooo much longer to make, and quite a while to restore from.
The actual smart move that follows best practices would be to keep the time capsule AND add a cloud backup option.

this way you have your data backed up locally for the quickest back up making /restoring /browsing AND an offsite copy in an encrypted cloud. The only purpose for a cloud backup is if your house burns down or your primary backup medium fails.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ener Ji
I don't think this is the issue. All this FCC requirement does is require wireless router manufacturers to update to a firmware that prevents the installation of hacked firmware builds that enable either unauthorized channels, or power boosts to authorized channels. Apple has known this is coming for over two years now and they could have easily rolled that firmware into the production line for their wireless devices during that time period if this is the issue.

As I understand the FCC rule, I believe Apple's routers are already compliant with this requirement anyway. Apple's router firmware appears to be closed source and I have not seen any hacks to enable the issues the FCC rule addresses.

This FCC rule is IMO aimed more at routers that allow open source packages like some of the WRT variants to be installed on their routers. Asus just rolled out an update that will block variants of these packages that can access the relevant wireless settings.

There has been quite a bit of discussion on this topic on the Asus Merlin firmware threads on SmallNetBuilder the last couple months or so.

The timing and geographical limits of this stock outage can hardly be coincidental, though I wonder as you do why Apple would still have noncompliant product in the pipeline years after the FCC requirement became known.
 
I wonder if/when Apple will update the Time Capsule to use an SSD drive? You can get a 4TB SSD from OWC now (https://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other World Computing/SSDA13MP4.0K/). With this, you get more storage, faster storage, and make it thinner at the same time! Note: I do know that the price is super expensive, but it's definitely possible.

Not necessarily faster..
Even with a gigabit copper connection to the time capsule, you still won't saturate the write speed of a standard 7200RPM HDD..
You might get marginally better read/seek times on SSD, but again, your bottleneck is the bandwidth from your ethernet cable, not anywhere near the speed of SATA.

The only real advantage SSD has, comes from multiple random access. So if you have 3 or 4 Macs backing up at the same time, then yes. They will all finish their backups faster than they would on a HDD.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.