Agreed....do you see any other router vendors pulling all their old stock? If it was because of the FCC regulation, they'd all have to be doing what Apple's doing.
was it any better when we used to get renderings of new iphones with curved antenna bands and some random chinese overlays?So, the biggest story of the day was that Apple may be complying with an FCC deadline.![]()
Yes, it is. Maybe it's a little early now, but Apple never did sell discounted old stuff at Apple Stores except for the non-Retina 13-inch MacBook Pro with optical drive, that's still available online, today.
Well I understand that but what I thought is that they managed production so that they would sell through most of the inventory before the refresh. Again, working at Microcenter (the Big Lots of computer stores), we saw A LOT of discontinued Airport Extremes. Not long after the last refresh the store started selling a ton of the previous gen at discounted price and they were not acquired from Apple.
Now all the talk is this is because of an FCC change that the routers have to accommodate. Couldn't that be done with a firmware update? I suppose not if Apple is pulling stock.
That's actually a brilliant idea. Combine Apple TV, wi-fi, and backup disk all into one device.
Why are people still buying these?
There are gobs better WiFi routers these days with far newer standards. Also people want backup solutions and storage that are many terabytes if they care to store things at home anymore and not the cloud. Not 1 or 2 that Apple wants to offer for a considerable price.
Personally, Apple should get out of this particular market of crappy over designed accessories for a shrinking market.
That's what it looks like for the past 3 years or so.What is that weird tall airport extreme in the photo in the article?
Just create an encrypted sparseimage on the attached disk, and store your data there.I'd like an Airport that supports encryption for attached disks.
I don't believe that has anything to do with this issue. Asus released updated firmware for their RT-AC68x series routers two weeks ago that addresses this FCC issue.Asus isn't pulling the old stock but are deeply discounting it. There have been fire sales the last few weeks on old routers like the RT-AC68R ($99 at Walmart, Target and T-Mobile) that have the old hardware revisions (non-C1). Asus, at least, seems to be trying to get the old routers out of brick and mortar retailers and replaced with the C1 revision. They didn't do this when they had the B1 revision.
I don't see any evidence the recent firmware update was for this FCC issue. The new FCC rule requires wireless router manufacturers to lock down firmware so it cannot be tweaked to use unauthorized channels, or boost the power on authorized channels. Apple's firmware has never been able to do either of those things, and as far as I have ever been able to find, there is no way to install any third party firmware on an Apple router to enable those features. So even with no update, it appears to me Apple's routers are compliant with the new FCC rule.The routers currently in service are being upgraded to comply with a firmware update. Both of mine were flashed with the new firmware yesterday. The difference is the FCC mandate apparently prohibits the sale of new routers without the required firmware after June 2. So Apple is pulling the old stock off the shelves presumably to be updated and returned. The only question is why they waited so long.
My 2012 TC recently died. Sad that the newest TC Apple offered was 3 years old out of the box. I'll have to check the latest software update.
So, can someone help enlighten me on what the new firmware is, and the new regulations? will it prevent DD-WRT on other brand routers, etc?
also does anyone flash/load custom firmware on an Apple router, ever?
Locking users out of disabling DFS is software stuff which could be done by a firmware upgrade. Locking the firmware itself more or less, too.
Not quite the same (yes, a VPN server _should_ be built into the Airport), but if you have an always-on Mac at home, VPNs are very easy to set up with OS X Server.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2339685/fcc-software-security-requirements.pdfWhat are the "rules" our FCC beauracrat masters have devised?
Last year, the FCC published a new set of rules that all router vendors must abide by if they want to sell their devices in the US. The rules say that routers should operate within a narrow set of limits.
The reasoning behind this decision was to prevent network interference from misconfigured devices jamming licensed radio frequencies. At its core, the ruling makes technical sense, since some users were in the habit of using custom firmware such as OpenWRT, DD-WRT, or Tomato, often resulting in routers operating at different frequencies than they were initially designed for.
The FCC did not specifically prohibit the act of loading custom open source firmware on these devices, but merely wanted to make clear it will not allow the commercialization of routers that allow users to alter frequency limits, output power, country codes, etc.
.....
That thing looks like it'll transform and kill you in your sleep.
I'm curious to see if they upgrade the express to 802.11AC. The current version is a joke!
Has anyone considered that they may simply discontinue them? There are tons of routers that offer better speed and better coverage - it's not like this is an outstanding product.
That makes no sense. A cloud backup only would take sooo much longer to make, and quite a while to restore from.
The actual smart move that follows best practices would be to keep the time capsule AND add a cloud backup option.
this way you have your data backed up locally for the quickest back up making /restoring /browsing AND an offsite copy in an encrypted cloud. The only purpose for a cloud backup is if your house burns down or your primary backup medium fails.