Forestall brought us the wonderful iOS 6 design that probably would have never gone away if he had stayed with Apple.I am not a Forestall fan by any means... but at this point... I think that Cook's culture of 'harmony' created an army of yes-men that will do whatever Cook and Ive say.
The fact that Forestall was far from Apple could also give him some advantage.
Unfortunately I don't think that will happen. Tim Cook is pushing profits above customers/innovation and the board will love him for it but it will lead to the collapse of Apple as a leader. They are destroying Apples future to make more profits now.
It's ranked highest in satisfaction as it's one device Apple doesn't have much possibilities to show how much courage they have and totally CRIPPLE the product with their stupidity.
That's hard to believe.
You can't even configure it from a Windows PC which makes up 90% of PCs.
That sounds like a great romanticized idea, and I agree that it's probably what should have happened, but there's no way this is actually true. When they announced he would become CEO, they gave him a huge incentive to stay until 2021. Why would they do that if they didn't intend for him to stay? What incentive does Cook have to leave early and miss out on that sweet payout in five more years? And they've only given him more bonuses since then. https://www.macrumors.com/2011/08/26/apple-awards-tim-cook-1000000-shares-of-stock-as-ceo-bonus/As I said before in other threads, Cook's job was to be the immediate-post Jobs stabilizer. His experience in keeping up with tactical tasks was perfect to stabilize a company that had to live through the trauma of Jobs' death. His other task was to find the next visionary, instead he decided to become it. Cook badly misunderstood his role.
Why Apple Why, why are you doing this to us, First you made us addicted to amazing products and now you stopped refreshing them. (Mac Pro, Imac , and now this )
Focus on mobile at the expense of everything else is not what I would consider "innovation"I'm sorry, but if you think having the most powerful and efficient mobile SoC on the market today is not innovation, then I'm glad you are not working for Apple.
I think all the bloggers have overlooked the biggest reason Apple is getting out of the router biz: most every ISP in the country now, or will soon include router and wi-fi capabilities built-in as part of their modem hardware.
Hard to compete with "free"...
That is irrelevant; as the study is about satisfaction of customers who already own the routers. People who have AirPort products like them more than people with different routers.That's hard to believe.
You can't even configure it from a Windows PC which makes up 90% of PCs.
mesh is the future anyway
Tim Cook should resign.
Really was disappointed when I first learned of Apple halting further development of routers. I've had a first generation Airport express that has worked solidly for years. Whatever possessed them to remove a worthwhile division is a bad sign.
I think all the bloggers have overlooked the biggest reason Apple is getting out of the router biz: most every ISP in the country now, or will soon include router and wi-fi capabilities built-in as part of their modem hardware.
Hard to compete with "free"...
Apple did its level best though, by requiring an OS-restricted app to access the settings rather than a web OS-independent interface as is the standard in the industry. It compounded that by dumbing down the app until it only provided the basics. People held onto release 5.6.1 for as long as possible to access all the settings before it wouldn't run any more.
This is sad, I really do like my Time Capsule.