Let me know once it’s as quick and easy as swapping a physical sim. I think it’ll be awhile before that happens.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
All iPhone 16 Models Sold Outside U.S. Still Have Physical SIM Card Tray
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Let me know once it’s as quick and easy as swapping a physical sim. I think it’ll be awhile before that happens.
This seems to be really a tough one, also for me. Using an iPhone 13 mini. I really like eSIM, it has made my international travel so much easier. At the same time, one of my travel/ foreign SIM cards remains a physical one. Working to change that (can only be done in that country) but I also appreciate the convenience and flexibility of the slot.
While I understand that, I would like to debunk this quickly that from iOS 17, you can easily transfer eSIMS from iPhone to iPhone.
No QR codes needed, no carrier intervention.
Go and add an eSIM and you have an option to transfer an eSIM from another iPhone nearby.
You can use two esims or an esim and a physical one at the same time
If you could push the sad reality of it through that thick cranium, then you’d know to be the very victim of the forced idea for you to have to get, or believe to want it by a that third party you also falsely call it KM without having a slightest idea what it is. Of course you don’t see deregulating with a regulation. It’s called indoctrination.
Ahh yea the good old days of my phone breaking and swapping the sim into my cellular iPad to use data. Looks like I’ll be keeping my iPhone 13 for years to come.
courage?Why would they let us upgrade storage when they’re happy to sell us more at a premium?
I’m a stockholder and I think it makes way more sense to include the sim tray in all iPhones worldwide, if only to have a single version of each model for manufacturing efficiency. The only reason I can think of for the status quo is some sort of deal with the big legacy carriers in the US whose strategy is to lock their users in and make it as difficult as possible to switch or use other carriers. This approach is bad for the consumer and short sighted of AAPL to support.
I wonder has Apple thought about the ability to store up to 16 eSIM "images" on a single iPhone, with two active. It would certainly make it useful if you travel around eastern Asia or in Europe and have to set up a local number on a temporary basis.
Is that where the terms I’ve heard used in the past “ Apple bundle “ or something come into play when it comes to USA carriers and MVNO?
And here lays the problem. The state here is in peoples lives and business but not those that they receive lobbying money from. Not those that they need to be keeping a tab on. Hence why consumer laws are sub standard compared to other developed western nations and corporations especially USA ones can do what they please with little to no accountability.
Late to this party but I have no idea why Apple removed the SIM slot when there appears to be no need to do so.
I travel to countries with no eSIM capability or if they do, it takes too long to activate. I need to land and have an activated phone. eSIM does not cut it.
However the thing that really gets me is that the iPhone has the space to have a SIM card carrier but they do not provide it in the US, but why? This smacks of some deal with the carriers that want to prevent people swapping phones easily for some reason. I hate being forced into something that is completely unnecessary like the regional coding on movies that prevented you taking a movie and playing it in another country. This was not technical issue it was money and political and I am beginning to suspect the same about SIM trays in the US. Why, I haven't a clue.
I travel to countries with no eSIM capability or if they do, it takes too long to activate. I need to land and have an activated phone. eSIM does not cut it.
However the thing that really gets me is that the iPhone has the space to have a SIM card carrier but they do not provide it in the US, but why? This smacks of some deal with the carriers that want to prevent people swapping phones easily for some reason. I hate being forced into something that is completely unnecessary like the regional coding on movies that prevented you taking a movie and playing it in another country. This was not technical issue it was money and political and I am beginning to suspect the same about SIM trays in the US. Why, I haven't a clue.
Crazy it’s still legal to “carrier lock” a phone. In Denmark carrier lock hasn’t been a thing for many years. No matter what carrier or store you buy a phone it will never come locked to a specific carrier.
I finally went eSIM with my iPhone 13. I‘m using Tello (MNVO). It was actually really easy to setup, although I needed to log into their website to get my QR Code. I scanned the QRC and it downloaded the eSIM.
Here's what it says on the comparison page for a 14. I think the rest are there too.
Attachments
Agreed - it's completely nuts
I can't speak to other countries, but in the USA we customers are but mere pawns on the chessboard of corporate profits and shareholder returns
Last edited:
Yep. That's pretty much it.
Also, as with other threads about AT&T carrier deals and so forth it seems nobody buys their phone, they only finance them which comes with all sorts of strings and hoops including locks on using it abroad. I got tired of it, and bought an older phone that I'm keeping until it's dead. I can do what I want with it or change carriers if I get really burnt.
It went from subsidies to these new "deals" to buy people out of their phone payments so they can switch carriers.
Now that the USA is down to 3 main carriers they had to do something to get new people to get that stock price up as there are a finite number of customers.
Last edited:
In a similar theme, I just came across this article. It's another way the carriers are out to screw customers.
This article should probably be a whole new thread.
arstechnica.com
This article should probably be a whole new thread.
T-Mobile, AT&T oppose unlocking rule, claim locked phones are good for users
T-Mobile, AT&T oppose unlocking rule, claim locked phones are good for users
Carriers fight plan to require unlocking of phones 60 days after activation.
arstechnica.com
In a similar theme, I just came across this article. It's another way the carriers are out to screw customers.
This article should probably be a whole new thread.
T-Mobile, AT&T oppose unlocking rule, claim locked phones are good for users
T-Mobile, AT&T oppose unlocking rule, claim locked phones are good for users
Carriers fight plan to require unlocking of phones 60 days after activation.
I would love for them to put forth one single “user” who thinks the phone being locked is some benefit to them
It's kind of like how the carrier mergers are somehow supposed to be "better" for consumers.
I didn't see my costs going down after T-Mobile and Sprint became one.