Are they’ve seriously going to have two models separated by only 1mm in size???
each model is separated by 4mm in size? 41/45/49
Are they’ve seriously going to have two models separated by only 1mm in size???
Yep. I’m going to take a serious look at it and then choose. I’m most interested in better software for it, and of course that it looks better than the current ones. I’m leaning toward a Garmin Epix.Let’s face it, when the Apple Watch was first launched in 2015, the possibilities seemed endless and exciting.
Seven years’ later, other than cellular untethering, there’s been very little significant innovation. Incremental dripfeeds at best.
They can’t decide if this is meant to be a fashion item, fitness tracker, or health monitor. And this larger “rugged Pro” is no different.
Jack of all trades, master of none.
Too soon…I guess it won't be long before the right-size Watch for my wrist gets called the "Watch Mini" and eventually discontinued.
Agree One Million Percent. It should just run iOS, and let it run regular applications. And also just let it be a regular phone instead of this weird hybrid tethered to an iPhone BS.Such a large display DESERVES a much better operating system.
If this Pro watch has the same watchOS as the Series 4 then 👎
Battery and physics.I don't get why only big wrists humans are eligible for Apple Watch Pro. 🤔
That is a very stupid comment.No, this method is mostly used for preventing pregnancies. It's only called "family planning" to sugar coat it for religious fundamentalists
Fair point, although those watches really do look gorgeous. Maybe Apple will surprise us, but I don’t expect to be able to say “gorgeous” about an Apple Watch. They’re cool, and extraordinarily functional. I love mine. But gorgeous they are not. So maybe if we get a beautiful Apple Pro, I’ll have to eat my words.Check out the prices on high end Garmin watches
Big battery.I don't get why only big wrists humans are eligible for Apple Watch Pro. 🤔
41mm for a Pro is an impossible ask at this time but I do think there should be a 45mm option alongside the 49mm optionBig battery.
Would you be happy with a 41mm watch that's 3/4" thick?
It’d be way bigger than this then. Whilst we are all used to a round face, like a clock or swiss movement watch, butI think the larger size would look better on a round watch face.
The Garmin looks nice because of the flat face. It looks like a traditional Swiss/Japanese Movement Watch. I think a flat face on the Apple Watch will also look gorgeous with the right face and complications.Fair point, although those watches really do look gorgeous. Maybe Apple will surprise us, but I don’t expect to be able to say “gorgeous” about an Apple Watch. They’re cool, and extraordinarily functional. I love mine. But gorgeous they are not. So maybe if we get a beautiful Apple Pro, I’ll have to eat my words.
You want to slag off a third button on a Apple Watch before Apple even tells you what they want to do with it? I’m sure Tim Cook is more insightful than you are in that regard.Jobs would have flipped out at them adding an extra button to the Apple Watch. I can see Ive not being happy at this and the recent parting of ways with Love From and Apple might be him distancing himself from what looks like the fall of product design within Apple and the rise of product marketing. Which effectively makes Apple no different from anyone else. Shame...
Next it'll be a 3 button Apple mouse. I'll slag that off too.You want to slag off a third button on a Apple Watch before Apple even tells you what they want to do with it? I’m sure Tim Cook is more insightful than you are in that regard.