Judging by the identifier "9,2", I'm led to assume this is the plus, since the 6S+ was labeled "8,2", as the article stated. Maybe the pro would be labeled "9,3"? Maybe it's just wishful thinking...
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Alleged iPhone 7 Plus Geekbench Results Reveal 2.37 GHz Dual-Core A10 Chip, 3GB of RAM [Updated: Fake]
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Judging by the identifier "9,2", I'm led to assume this is the plus, since the 6S+ was labeled "8,2", as the article stated. Maybe the pro would be labeled "9,3"? Maybe it's just wishful thinking...
ARM, ARM, ARM. Coming to a Mac near you soon.
Would certainly explain the next Macs being "the most significant upgrade ever undertaken by Apple".
Would certainly explain the next Macs being "the most significant upgrade ever undertaken by Apple".
I upgraded from an iPhone 5S to the iPhone 6S and saw significant improvement in browsing, opening apps, camera response etc. but year - to raise the bar from here might be more a question about future proofing than solving a problem right here, right now
You mean the skylake chip that just came out? not all processors are release at once
I am certain that I will enjoy a "noticeable difference" when compared to my 5S. It's getting used to the "noticeable difference" of the Plus size that concerns me; bye-bye one handed use.
I've told you a million times to stop exaggerating. LOL
Seriously, I would be alarmed and disappointed if Apple put 3GB in the Plus and only 2GB in the 4.7". The camera differences I can sort of understand, as it can be attributed to real estate. But if the SE has shown Apple anything it's that people want cutting edge features and don't necessarily want larger size.
If I'm understanding you correctly... Apple is still using the 4th generation i7-4980HQ in the 15" rMBP.
And Intel has since released the 5th generation i7-5950HQ... but Apple decided not to use it.
So I'm not seeing how Apple is stuck waiting on Intel.
Microsoft did. No one wanted it so they withdrew it.
Apple is positioning the iPad as a PC notebook replacement.
I think the goal is one computer you carry around and plug in. Instead of laptop with plug in your reduce the footprint to a phone that plugs in and use keyboard when sit down and bigger monitor. Right now the phone could power every computer before around 2008 so in a few years it will be a reasonable option for everyone. Will not be as fast as a desktop but we compromise for laptops and this would be some more compromise that will work for a sizable portion of people. We will always need real computers but for many people this will work pretty well.
God 3gb of ram the score isn't even representative of how quick this is going to be. 3gb on iOS 
these things are gonna be a pleasure to use
these things are gonna be a pleasure to use
Until you starts to do real multitasking that the iPhones can't do to begin with.
On Samsung's high end smartphones, you can run like 4 apps at the same time. And for that, you absolutely need more than just 2 CPU-cores lol.
Come back later when iOS actually can do some of the cool things the Galaxy Note 7 can do for example and tell me if 2 CPU-cores are fun to use?
No, it's so Tim can use words like "fastest" and "best" at the iPhone 7 Keynote speech and demonstrate how the new iPhone can render screenloads of emoticons in record time. Faster than any Android phone.
The claim was made that Apple is stuck waiting on Intel. And that Intel misses Apple's release schedule.
But if Intel releases new chips... and Apple doesn't use them... that kinda punches holes in those earlier claims.