Right. If you refer back to the original context, you'll see the issue.This.
It's not a big deal either way.
Just thought I would put my signature to use.
Each time that poster's theory is debunked, the rationale changes. First it was quality, then it was learning what it meant to understand "design"--when in fact, the issue is that Apple does understand the nexus of aesthetics and function in design, and it was the poster's desires that fell outside that pursuit. "Living up" to what design means would clearly not be an argument in favor of including BD drives, so it offers no help in addressing his woes.