Amazon is scared ****less about Apple's imminent release of iCloud. They know darn well that iCloud will blow Amazon cloud storage away so they are trying to get as many people on board as possible before the announcement. Good luck with that.
Originally Posted by ZMacintosh
lol to all the artist bashing....i think the tone/tune would be different if iTunes had this album for 99¢
Lady Gaga is the worst "musician" alive.
I cringe at calling her a musician.
oops
Crap is crap regardless of who is selling it.
She wouldn't be the 6th most influential person in the world if people didn't appreciated her work.
ZMacintosh said:not trying to bash Amazon's great deal but if all they deliver to people is mp3s than its honestly not worth it, id rather have a lossless audio file than lossy mp3...i mean most consumers dont care to recognize the difference between lossy and lossless not that most know what that means..its a shame really but not something (mp3s, not this specific album) id purchase to put in my library.
still interesting tactics, but seems that its going to cost amazon more to do things like this since they have no viable means in that market...iTunes/Apple has a lot more pull in that area and amazon i think is just trying to throw things and hope they stick long enough to become valid,
Everyone have their own taste in music, but she's one hell of a performer. She wouldn't be the 6th most influential person in the world if people didn't appreciated her work.
LOL. It's pathetic that Lady Goo-Goo is at the top of the entertainment field. It says a lot about society.
That's assuming that, literally, ALL of those gazillion people (or even anything more than a minuscule number of them) are both AWARE of Amazon's service and interested in using it. I can bet solid money that about 99% of those online purchases will be through iTunes or ordering/purchasing the physical disc. She doesn't need an Amazon coupon to move units, when this release has been pushed as a big release for the past 6 months already.
I'm a bit shocked at how many negatives this comment got. Anybody with half a brain can see that Amazon's Cloud Storage and Google Music Beta were attempts by two companies scrambling to be first to market before Apple dropped the next bomb on them with iCloud. For all I know, iCloud may suck, but it seems Amazon and Google are nervous enough about it.
U know people said that about the beetles too
U know people said that about the beetles too
Although I'm not a Gaga fan, I like some of songs that she's written for other artists, but I definitely agree with you. She only had to go that route, just like many artists, because today's generation doesn't care for piano and jazz and old school music, so the only way to get her music out there was to create a controversial image of herself, and whether you agree with what she's doing or not, she must be doing something right... I remember Eminem's line in "Sing for the moment" he says: "It's F*&%ed up ain't, how we can come from practically nothing, to being able to have any F$&*in' thing that we wanted..."
She's definitely succeeded at that![]()
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)
Pretty sure he's basing it on Apple fanboy ignorance. Just my two cents. Nothing to be scared of. Cloud storage is cloud storage. Believe it or not, some people hate apple and wouldn't use the service whether it was free or not. Sometimes I hate coming here and reading all the ignorant drivel.
1) When Apple releases/announces something everybody ***** in their pants.
<snip>
THINK before calling someone ignorant.
I'll just add this here, as it seems relevant. lady gaga pre-gaga at nyu.